Owen Paterson might have resigned as an MP, but that doesn’t mean that this Government has backtracked on its sleazy, silencing agenda. Here’s why you should still be concerned (despite the U-turns) about the Government’s actions...1/
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
The Government initially protected Owen Paterson not by defending him as an individual, but by attempting to overhaul the whole Commons standards watchdog to suit itself. 2/
reuters.com/business/cop/m…
The Owen Paterson incident isn’t the only time the Government has shirked scrutiny.

Just consider how quick our Prime Minister was to ignore an investigation which found that Priti Patel had broken the ministerial code for her bullying behaviour. 3/
​​politicshome.com/news/article/p…
Oh, and of course it’s not just Priti Patel who’s fallen foul of the standards expected of a Government minister.

Our very own PM is constantly breaking the rules and finding ways to avoid the consequences. 4/
And there may be more news on that on the way, with the Electoral Commission’s probe into the Downing St flat refurb now with the Conservatives for a response...5/
While the Government may have chosen to stop protecting Owen Paterson, this wasn’t because of a sudden belief in justice and fairness. It was because the Government realised it had gone too far and upset the voting public. 6/
The Government still relies on public support to maintain its position - but it is actually doing everything possible to rig the system in its failure, avoid accountability and engineer elections its own way. 7/
As well as trying to overthrow the Commons standards watchdog, the Government is trying to overthrow the elections watchdog @ElectoralCommUK through the damaging Elections Bill. 8/
The Elections Bill will allow the Government to avoid scrutiny by ending the independence of the Electoral Commission (very pertinent giving the current investigation into the PM's flat refurb), and restricting certain campaigners at election time. 9/
bestforbritain.org/whistlestoptou…
The Government is also trying to avoid scrutiny through the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, which would allow it to ban protests that it doesn’t like - meaning that it can close itself off to challenges. 10/
The more success the Government has in making itself unassailable, the less it will need to rely on the public - and it will be able to increasingly ride roughshod over public sentiment. 11/
Remember Government U-turns on free school meals? Remember the U-turn on NHS surcharges for overseas medical staff? The Government didn’t change its mind on these things because it suddenly became compassionate...12/
politico.eu/article/uk-gov…
The reason for previous Government U-turns, just like this one with Owen Paterson, is because it has overstepped the mark in its assessment of what it can get away with. Each egregious policy is a test for the Government to see how far it can push our democracy. 13/
So far, it has tested the limits of our democracy by U-turning 36 times in just 23 months. 14/
politico.eu/newsletter/lon…
So unless we keep showing our loud opposition to what the Government is doing, we’ll soon find our opposition counts for nothing - or that we can’t oppose this Government at all. Find out more about how the Government is suppressing democracy here 👇/ENDS
bestforbritain.org/betterdemocracy

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Best for Britain

Best for Britain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BestForBritain

3 Nov
Priti Patel has been demonising refugees again, saying 70% of those reaching the UK in small boats are single men and ‘economic migrants’ - in other words, she claims they are not ‘genuine’ asylum seekers. Here’s why she’s plain wrong 🧵👇1/
theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
First of all, Priti Patel’s stats on asylum seekers aren’t quite accurate. In 2020, 57% of asylum seekers in the UK were men, 21% were women and 15% were children - with a further 5% of asylum seekers being unaccompanied minors. 2/
asylumineurope.org/reports/countr…
It is nevertheless true that the majority of asylum seekers in the UK are men. We want to explore why this is the case - and why so many of our politicians and media outlets deliberately weaponise this fact. 3/
Read 18 tweets
2 Nov
Britain is hosting #COP26 - and (when he's not napping, maskless, next to David Attenborough), our PM is talking the talk on climate commitments. But are we being more hypocritical than hospitable? 🧵👇 1/
In his opening speech Boris Johnson struck an unusually serious tone, telling world leaders ‘humanity has long since run down the clock on climate change.’ 2/
news.sky.com/story/cop26-sk…
He's right to say the world has a collective responsibility for climate change, but the polluting potency of developed nations like the UK means that we have a historical responsibility for climate change over the centuries... 3/
Read 14 tweets
29 Oct
🚨 BREAKING 🚨

New analysis by Best for Britain and @UKTradeBusiness shows replacing the trade lost between the UK and the EU since 2018 with trade from other countries could increase emissions from shipping to and from the UK by 88%. 1/
How does this add up?

In May, the ONS reported a 23.1% fall in the trade of goods between the UK and the EU in the first quarter of 2021 compared to the first quarter of 2018.

Meanwhile, trade with other countries remained relatively unaffected, falling by 0.8%. 2/
By weight, this is estimated to represent around 45.5 million tonnes which, if shipped equally to the UK’s top 5 trading partners outside the EU, could mean an estimated 88% increase in the carbon footprint of UK shipping.

That's 6.5 million tonnes of CO2. 3/
Read 11 tweets
27 Oct
Government bills to watch out for: @DavidDavisMP penned a piece for @guardian this week looking at how proposed reforms to judicial review will strip people of their freedoms to challenge the state - something he describes as ‘un-conservative’...🧵 1/
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Davis says that Conservatism is underpinned by a ‘heritage that champions individual liberty alongside a fair and balanced rule of law’.

So, using his definition, we’ve spotted several more ‘un-conservative’ bills. 2/
These include the Elections Bill, the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill and the Nationality and Borders Bill.

And, surprise surprise, it seems more of the government's own MPs don’t much like them either... 3/
Read 11 tweets
23 Oct
Is the Elections Bill the end of electoral pacts in Britain? A thread... 🗳️🧵 1/
bestforbritain.org/is_the_electio…
This bill is a ‘once in a generation’ reform of our creaking Victorian elections system. Hidden in the Bill is a measure that takes a bit of explaining, but leads us to believe that on top of everything else, the government is trying to quietly outlaw electoral pacts 2/
For background, our polling from May 21 found 64% of voters say political parties that broadly agree with each other, should work together at election time rather than stand against each other, including 63% of Conservatives and 70% of Labour supporters 3/
bestforbritain.org/proportionalre…
Read 21 tweets
6 Oct
The most hypocritical speech in history from @BorisJohnson? Here are nine things we spotted...
bestforbritain.org/the_most_hypoc…
🚨1: The PM praised the spirit of our England footballers who made it to a European Final this summer - but he refused to condemn those who booed them for taking the knee. Indeed his Home Secretary accused the lions of gesture politics...
🚨2: Johnson was critical of the UK's low number of rape convictions - but in July he instructed his MPs to vote against introducing minimum sentences for rape, against criminalising street sexual harassment and against making it easier for survivors of rape to testify in court.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(