Ds respond to the charge that they're slouching toward 2010 redux by racing to pass a bill jammed with social engineering that no one has read, and which Rs will spend the next 10 months framing while Ds talk up the massive price tag.
At least in 2010, they had a hope of passing the thing into law. This is just a positioning statement that Rs get to make the centerpiece of their midterm pitch. Rs are blessed. They didn't do anything to deserve their good fortune.
A lot of this is going to be easy for Rs to mobilize their voters against while probably having a smaller energizing effect on D voters. For example:
The surtax on incomes over $10m also targets pass-through businesses with revenue over $200k. That's not a lot of revenue, so Rs get to call it a small business tax. Same for the NIIT for joint filers with S corp or partnership income.
Price negotiation for prescription drugs in Medicare. Everyone loves that, right? It really only targets 10 drugs before 2025. But what is functionally price controls will hit small businesses, which most of pharma is. And this is an industry that has a lot of residual goodwill.
The local journalism tax credit, which "would provide a credit up to $25,000 to defray employment taxes in the first year, and $15,000 in the next four years, for each employee.” Get ready to hear a lot about the "media bailout."
Four weeks paid leave. Again, eveyrone loves it. But it's estimated to cost $200 billion (per NPR, who could only get a source to admit as much without attribution. npr.org/2021/11/03/105…
Salt tax relief. Enough said.
Illegal immigrants here before Jan 1 2011 are eligible for "parole," which isn't a greencard or citizenship, but does defer deportation and grants work status. ~7 million eligible. We have a labor shortage, so that's not a bad provision. But Rs will get more milage than Ds
There really isn't one resource that has pulled all this together because, again, no one has really read the thing yet. But Rs will. And they'll make it the biggest story of the year. Meanwhile, all Ds get is a statement of principle that has no hope of becoming law. Madness.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Americans don’t like to be humiliated abroad, and they don't like surrendering to terrorists. Voters don’t typically reward policies that make them feel both mortified and unsafe.
Americans like the United States and don't like being lectured about how awful it is. Moreover, voters don’t appreciate racial conflict. They will do what they can to avoid or defuse it whenever possible. Democrats have not given voters that option.
We will continue to speak out, so everyone who is going to be subjugated can take heart that there will be speeches on their behalf.
The Afghan government we supported for 20 years is responsible for all this, but our leadership in the world and our support for our allies is unquestionable.
“Doctors and scientists agree that, at least for the foreseeable future, indoor masking is here to stay. Vaccines may not offer complete protection and contagious variants continue to pose a risk.” abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/dit…
“ So when can you consider going mask-less outside?
When you are alone outside or with your household, you may not need to mask up, although you’ll want to keep your mask handy, experts suggest.”
“...that level of community protection, where we can all go back to what looks like an old normal, that's going to be very, very difficult unless we get very, very much increased participation.”
A slightly nuanced take on the implosion of the Russia bounties story, which is indicative only of how discourse on this website is not only unhelpful but an obstacle to the fullest understanding of events. Apologies in advance, but it’s a thread…
When the story broke, my take on it was A) we shouldn’t know about it, because leaking this claim all but forecloses on the possibility of substantiating it sufficient to prove the charge. But also B) it’s *plausible.* commentarymagazine.com/noah-rothman/w… Here’s why…
If you recall, when the story dropped it was accompanied with the allegation that Iran was also putting a price on American heads. cnn.com/2020/08/17/pol… That allegation is supported by evidence and testimony going back to 2005 fdd.org/analysis/2010/…