Yes, but if angry white parents spent months complaining to school boards that their kids were being taught about institutional racism, it would be less “gangbusters electoral strategy” and more “those feral rednecks are insane”
And for the record, I have not conceded that Rufo just “gave a name” to a thing that was already happening: he used the name of an existing legal academic theory to describe something completely different. It’s a little like calling the Native Americans “Indians.”
I am well aware that informing conservatives that they are factually incorrect is exclusively the domain of pointy-headed political naifs, as it changes the minds of no one and makes our side appear fussy, pedantic, & completely out-of-touch with the pulse of Real Americans
The message of CRT was a dog whistle: “They’re teaching our kids that white people are racist!” To Trump’s America, that was like waving a red flag in front of a bull.
Because for all their talk of rioting & looting Black Lives Matter thugs and Cancel Culture and Sharia Law and the Woke Left and Obama’s birth certificate and building a wall at the Mexican border, the one thing Republicans can’t abide is ANYONE suggesting they are racist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Right continues to insist otherwise because they are fundamentally dishonest people who don’t care.
Robert Byrd was not a racist for his entire life. He renounced the Klan & was honored by the NAACP.
The Right continues to pretend that never happened because they are fundamentally dishonest people who don’t care.
Critical Race Theory is not taught in public schools. The term is misused to reflect any blanket acknowledgement of white privilege or institutional racism, which does exist.
The Right continues to insist otherwise because they are fundamentally dishonest people who don’t care.
Some comedians discuss serious issues in their acts. They are more than entitled to do so. Their views can be enlightening, or infuriating.
But “Don’t take him seriously; he’s just a comedian” does not absolve anyone of the responsibility to stand by the meaning of his words.
I understand that context is important. That is not what I am describing here. It is the blanket defense of ANY comedian’s words with the argument that you’re not allowed to take them seriously, even if context indicates that they intended their words to be as serious as cancer.
I’ll acknowledge that I’m talking mostly about Dave Chappelle & Bill Maher, two comics capable of great insight who have also used their platforms to promote ignorant & infuriating ideas. A recent comment on the latter’s Facebook page struck me as something of a Platonic ideal: