1) "The politics of time." For all of those dealing with the time change this morning, and wondering who is responsible, look no further than the U.S. Congress.
2) In 1784, Ben Franklin advocated “springing ahead” in spring and “falling back” in autumn in tandem with the sun to conserve candles. But the U.S. never formally implemented the concept until passage of the Standard Time Act in 1918.
3) Sometimes referred to as the Calder Act, the law established the four continental time zones of the United States. Spurred by World War I and efforts to save fuel, Congress initiated “summer” Daylight Saving Time in late March 1918.
4) With no mass media available, a campaign ensued to alert the public to the shift. A war-related poster from the period declares “Victory! Congress passes Daylight Saving Bill.”
5) The poster depicts Uncle Sam adjusting the hands of a clock, a rifle slung over his shoulder and farming implements in hand.
6) “Get your hoe ready!” reads another caption while a cartoon clock face attached to a body dances for joy. Inscribed on the clock are the words “One Hour of Extra Daylight.”
7) Of course, this wouldn’t be the first time Congress passed something and then had to market the law. The time measure proved to be unpopular and Congress prepared another piece of legislation to end Daylight Saving Time. President Woodrow Wilson subsequently vetoed the bill.
8) However, both houses of Congress executed a rare, successful override. Congress has only overridden 112 presidential vetoes in US history. But one of them was to override the veto of the time change bill.
9) By executive order, FDR imposed year-round “War Time,” moving the clocks ahead for an hour. After World War II ended in 1945, most eastern and northern instituted Daylight Saving Time in the warmer months.
10) But that led to confusion with some towns and states instituting their own time schemes. It got so bad that some called for federal regulation. The result was the Uniform Time Act of 1966.
11) Congress mandated that people would advance their clocks by an hour at 2 am on the last Sunday in April. Arizona and Michigan immediately opted out. But Congress updated the law to allow states which were federally split by time zones to choose their own time, such as Indiana
12) International conflict again forced Congress to tinker with time a few years later.
The 1973 OPEC oil embargo forced Congress to implement year-round Daylight Saving Time for two years to decrease fuel consumption.
13) Advocates for the “longer” days argued that time shifting cut down on crime, traffic accidents and provided more daylight for recreation. But the fuel savings proved negligible.
14) Congress updated the law again in 1986. Daylight Saving Time would start on the first Sunday in April and clocks would return to Standard Time on the final Sunday in October. But Congress installed a “sunset” (ahem) on this policy for 2006.
15) Between 2003 and 2005, Congress wrestled with a massive, comprehensive piece of energy legislation Buried in the legislation was provision to extend the period of Daylight Saving Time.
16) Under the law, the new calendar shifted the beginning DST from what had been early April to early March. On the back end, Daylight Saving Time would no longer cease in October but early November.
17) At the time, then Hse Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and late Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY) pushed to delay the regress to Standard Time until November. That’s so the time change wouldn't interfere with trick-or-treaters in late Oct & could do so in daylight
18) At the end the day (at whatever hour it may come, depending on the season), legislative time shifting has historically been about saving energy. In colonial times. In war time. During the oil shocks. Even if there is only a finite period of daylight available to work with.
19) Congress is powerful. But it can’t extend or diminish the length of a solar day. A 2010 Utah State study asserted that the nation’s chronometric vacillation actually costs $1.7 billion a year.
20) Some mbrs of the FL Congressional delegation have pushed for Congress to establish one time year round. Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT) sponsored the "Daylight Act. It would allow states to stay on Daylight Saving Time me. The bill is jammed up in cmte.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A) We have officially reached the “Stockholm Syndrome” level of where House Democrats stand with negotiations.
The House met at at 8 am et today with the expectation that Democrats could advance both the infrastructure bill and the social spending package.
B) That quickly hit a roadblock. Now House Democrats are at least trying to secure a partial win by passing the infrastructure bill later tonight.
Enter, the Stockholm Syndrome.
C) This is a time honored tradition by leaders of both sides as they try to get the votes on a big issue. As a result, Congressional leaders keep members at the Capitol late at night or over the weekend.
1) We’ve heard for weeks about Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ).
How about “The Others.”
It’s the “others” who are causing a problem for House Democrats today as they try to advance the social spending bill.
2) Democrats need most if not all of these “others” if they’re going to pass their bill and only have a three vote turning radius.
3) Some of those “others” are Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D-FL), leader of the Blue Dogs, Reps. Tom O’Halleran (D-AZ), Kurt Schrader (D-OR), Scott Peters (D-CA), Kathleen Rice (D-NY), Ed Case (D-HI), Ron Kind (D-WI), Carolyn Bordeaux (D-GA) and others.
1) McCarthy on Fox: We're going to see a very long day, and my fear is it's back to what Speaker Pelosi said in the past. You have to pass the bill to know what's in it.
2) McCarthy: What's really scary to me is history. In 2009, Republicans won the governorship of Virginia and New Jersey. And four days later, Nancy Pelosi walked the Democrats off the cliff and passed Obamacare. She's trying to do the exact same thing today
3) McCarthy on Pelosi: I think it's very close. I think she's within a couple votes away. We're here hearing last night she's pushing it forward today. They they've done this every week for the last two months, so we'll see.
1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide To Today’s Possible Votes in the House
The House of Representatives meets at 8 am et today as Democrats rush to finish their social spending package.
The aim is for the House to vote on both the social spending bill and infrastructure measures today.
2) Bill text is done, altered late last night. That technically violates the House’s “72 hour rule” for members to read legislation before a vote. There is also no final CBO “score” evaluating the costs of the legislation. This was a sticking point for moderate Democrats.
3) Timing on all of this is impossible to predict. But here are the mechanics:
The House must first consider the “rule.” That establishes the parameters of debate for the social spending package. Think of this as a “pre-debate.” But the House is not actually on the bill itself.
1) The House COULD vote on the social so ending and infrastructure bills today…but then again, we’ve heard that before
2) The Rules Committee met until nearly 12:30 this morning and did not approve a “rule” to put the social spending bill on the floor. If the House lacks a “rule,” to establish the parameters of debate, it can’t bring up the bill.
3) So, this could bleed into Friday or be a very late night tonight.
That said, all the House needs to do is vote on the infrastructure bill to line up with the Senate. The House debated that bill weeks ago. The Senate approved the infrastructure package in early August.