MSCHF bought an original Andy Warhol for $20,000 and made 999 exact forgeries.
They mixed the original in and sold 1,000 pieces that *might be a real Warhol* for $250 each.
That’s $250k 🤌🏼
Here's what they did:
MSCHF is a company (kind of) that does wild product drops. They were behind the Lil Nas X Satan shoe, among other things.
Their latest project, Museum of Forgeries, is exactly what it sounds like.
- Bought the $20k Warhol
- Made 999 forgeries
- Sold all 1000 for $250 a pop
Love it tbh. From the team:
“Possibly Real Copy Of ‘Fairies’ by Andy Warhol” is a series of 1000 identical artworks. They are all definitely by MSCHF, and also all possibly by Andy Warhol. Any record of which piece within the set is the original has been destroyed."
First, they made replicas.
They systematically draw 999 ink on paper replicas of 'Fairies', copying every stroke perfectly.
Then, they degrade and age the piece with heat and light, creating all the same imperfections as the original in each of the new ones.
Step 3 - authentication.
They add the signature, and a MSCHF stamp of authenticity.
The replica Warhols (and the real one) are now MSCHF originals.
Finally they mix all 1,000 pieces together and destroy any record of which one is the real Warhol.
"By forging Fairies en masse, we obliterate the trail of provenance for the artwork. Though physically undamaged, we destroy any future confidence in the veracity of the work."
A $20k Warhol turns into a $250 MSCHF piece.
They sell out 1,000 and net $250k on the project.
Their insights about the mechanics are my favorite part.
It's nothing groundbreaking but I've never thought about it in this context.
Copies reduce the value of each piece, but increase the revenue.
"Posters, prints, or easily replicable derivative works turn an artwork into a product line, and when you hit the big time, product lines tend to be net more profitable than a handful of masterworks."
So they destroyed the original and leveraged it into a product line.
Destruction by duplication. An anti-NFT project.
MSCHF says:
"Democratization of access or ownership destroys any work premised on exclusivity."
I want one of these, and I'll have to buy on eBay and hope it's.... authentic? Lol
We discussed this in the last episode of Tab Talk - a podcast where @jamesoncamp and @orenmeetsworld and I break down all the random browser tabs we have open
Costco uses its Kirkland Signature brand to rip off the best products in the world.
To the tune of $39 billion dollars a year in sales.
But it's not just cashews and olive oil anymore, it's $400 Scotty Cameron putters too.
🏌️THREAD:
Kirkland Signature started as Costco's private label grocery and household product brand, similar to Amazon Basics, but they've been getting creative as long as I can remember.
In HS I remember the Kirkland White Tees being a staple.
Anyway, a couple weeks ago @quinnmiller recommends the Kirkland Putter to me. Not only that, the Kirkland balls too.
The Kirkland ball takes aim at the Titleist Pro V1, and the Kirkland KS1 Putter is a Scotty Cameron Newport, perhaps with a dash of Ping Anser.
Most prerolls suck, so we figured out how to make them better.
Then made millions of them.
Here's how:
(THREAD)
Prerolls are a simple product, but the core component has one huge variable:
It's weed. Ground up weed.
Cannabis (more-so then a lot of agricultural products) is super inconsistent, and so are the grinders smokers have been using for years to grind up and roll their joint.
Your head probably immediately goes to tobacco and cigarettes.
Nice try. Tobacco and processing machines are for leaves - not sticky, resinous, dense flowers.