"This effort within The Bronx Defenders really took off because our colleague Christopher Smith had gone down to Texas, and observed firsthand just how just commonplace it was for folks to have weapons, to have guns, and for no one to bat an eyelash."
"His experience directly contrasted with our experience as public defenders in New York City, where we are seeing people engage in the exact same conduct and end up on Rikers Island."
"And a lot of the people who support criminal law reform in New York have never really squarely addressed what to do with people possessing firearms for self-defense."
"I mean, if you mention the Second Amendment in a New York City criminal courtroom, people will literally laugh. It’s totally irrelevant to the way law is practiced here."
"And I don’t have any clients, nor have I ever heard of anyone ever having any clients, that were white supremacists whom the New York Police Department arrested for possessing a firearm without a license."
"Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg has even literally admitted that the point of policing in New York City is to throw Black and brown people against the wall and take their guns away."
"They rely on the exact same logic that people did in the 1980s and in the 1990s when aggravating sentences for crack possession or when justifying stop-and-frisk or other increased and aggressive police activity in public housing developments."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Judge Hardiman asks NJ what prompted the investigation into S&W's advertising. NJ says it was "several things," including ads that say the company's guns are "the most accurate and reliable."
NJ lawyer now arguing with multiple judges as to why it needs to investigate a gun company for claiming its products are "the most accurate and reliable."
Scirica asks if it could be "characterized as puffery." NJ lawyer says she doesn't think so.
"We are public defenders. New York’s gun laws eviscerate our clients’ Second Amendment rights." scotusblog.com/2021/10/we-are…
"Faced with a 3.5-year mandatory minimum prison sentence, Jose pled to a lesser charge. His sentence was one year on Rikers Island — a 'good deal' for simple firearm possession in New York City. For exercising a constitutional right, Jose is now a so-called violent felon."
"That licensing requirement is the key to New York’s ban on firearm possession: It is a pretext whose true purpose is to make firearm possession unlawful. For our clients, it makes the Second Amendment a legal fiction."
Everytown's Federal Legal Director says that this lawsuit "is about the NRA's radical gun agenda, not the law," and that it "has nothing to do with the Constitution and everything to do with gun industry profits."
Everytown's Federal Legal Director says that "the NRA wants to use this case as a first step towards rolling back hundreds of gun safety laws across the country" and that it will "put nearly every gun safety law at risk"
New York v. NRA (NY state court): National Rifle Association's opposition to motion to intervene
"This baseless Motion is a transparent effort by a member of the Association to frustrate the collective will of millions of members..." iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…