Judge Hardiman asks NJ what prompted the investigation into S&W's advertising. NJ says it was "several things," including ads that say the company's guns are "the most accurate and reliable."
NJ lawyer now arguing with multiple judges as to why it needs to investigate a gun company for claiming its products are "the most accurate and reliable."
Scirica asks if it could be "characterized as puffery." NJ lawyer says she doesn't think so.
Hardiman asks if that statement from S&W was made before the NJ Attorney General said he would "turn up the heat" on gun companies.
NJ says that statement from the AG was in a tweet.
Hardiman: "That doesn't make it better."
Hardiman: "Tweets are now substitutes for deliberative process of our attorneys general?"
Hardiman says NJ's "turn up the heat" statement sounds like "an implication of suspicion that Smith & Wesson is illegally creating guns."
Judge Matey starting a question: "Sorry to return to Twitter..."
NJ argues that S&W isn't able to bring this case in federal court, and should be confined to state court.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"This effort within The Bronx Defenders really took off because our colleague Christopher Smith had gone down to Texas, and observed firsthand just how just commonplace it was for folks to have weapons, to have guns, and for no one to bat an eyelash."
"His experience directly contrasted with our experience as public defenders in New York City, where we are seeing people engage in the exact same conduct and end up on Rikers Island."
"And a lot of the people who support criminal law reform in New York have never really squarely addressed what to do with people possessing firearms for self-defense."
"We are public defenders. New York’s gun laws eviscerate our clients’ Second Amendment rights." scotusblog.com/2021/10/we-are…
"Faced with a 3.5-year mandatory minimum prison sentence, Jose pled to a lesser charge. His sentence was one year on Rikers Island — a 'good deal' for simple firearm possession in New York City. For exercising a constitutional right, Jose is now a so-called violent felon."
"That licensing requirement is the key to New York’s ban on firearm possession: It is a pretext whose true purpose is to make firearm possession unlawful. For our clients, it makes the Second Amendment a legal fiction."
Everytown's Federal Legal Director says that this lawsuit "is about the NRA's radical gun agenda, not the law," and that it "has nothing to do with the Constitution and everything to do with gun industry profits."
Everytown's Federal Legal Director says that "the NRA wants to use this case as a first step towards rolling back hundreds of gun safety laws across the country" and that it will "put nearly every gun safety law at risk"
New York v. NRA (NY state court): National Rifle Association's opposition to motion to intervene
"This baseless Motion is a transparent effort by a member of the Association to frustrate the collective will of millions of members..." iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…