The CPI is currently running well ahead of its pre-COVID 2% growth trend, although it is worth acknowledging that the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (which the Federal Reserve targets) has shows significantly lower readings.
The pandemic has driven spending that would have gone to services into additional consumer and durable goods. Supply chains appear strained are operating under unprecedented order volumes. In other words, this is a crisis of abundance rather than a crisis of scarcity.
Today, goods prices tell a different story. Car prices have stalled, with used car and truck prices growing 2.5% after shrinking in August and September. This is partly because rising prices choked demand and partly because vaccinations are enabling additional services spending.
The rise in services spending has started to pull service sector prices back up to pre-pandemic growth rates. Take housing: As the economy strengthens and COVID abates, rent growth is climbing as workers return to cities and household formation starts up again.
However, to have sustained inflation, rising labor costs would have to be passed on to consumers by businesses across industries.
Current evidence contradicts this: price increases are concentrated in the goods sector while wage increases are concentrated in the service sector.
In addition, corporate profit margins have been increasing as prices rise faster than labor costs.
The widening spread between sales prices and unit labor costs indicate that large corporations are flexing their pricing power and have not suffered under tighter labor markets.
Fundamentally, sustained inflation cannot occur without above-trend income and spending growth. As of right now, both personal incomes and personal spending remain on-trend.
As long as nominal income growth remains on-trend inflation will slide back down to normal levels.
If you want more economic news and analysis, consider subscribing! It's free, and helps me out a ton.
These posts are part of a new series where I am breaking down regular data releases. All input is truly appreciated as these are a work-in-progress.
In September I tackled the "natural" rates of interest, unemployment, and economic growth and how their use and estimates impair economic policymaking. apricitas.substack.com/p/the-fault-in…
In August I discussed automation and its effects on the labor market to explain why robots don't take our jobs and what the future of work looks like. apricitas.substack.com/p/the-interper…
I really want to push back on both this construction of the market estimate of r* and its conclusions.
You can't use long term bond yields as evidence of the "natural rate of interest" as these yields are implicitly based on expectations of future short term policy rates.
If long term bond yields partially reflect expected future short term rates, we would see expectations of excessively tight monetary policy reflected in this estimate of r*.
Indeed, that's what we saw during the 2013 taper tantrum and right now with Japanese Government Bonds.
I'm not a big fan of r* conceptually, as I elaborate on here. Monetary policy is almost always a set of choices, and constructing a reliable measurement of "natural" interest rates is extremely hard.
I had to cut a lot of information (including a lot of drama with exchange rates) to fit the meme format but you can read the full external report here:
First, let's look at Nominal Gross Domestic Product (NGDP). NGDP growth was low throughout the 2010s and never returned to the pre-recession trend after 2008. Today, NGDP has practically returned to its pre-pandemic trend!
Gross Labor Income (GLI), which measures the total worker compensation, also appears to be on trend by traditional measures. However, using the enjoyment cost index, which allows us to better track GLI in real time, shows that there's still room for improvement.
After stalling out at 78% for 2 months, the prime age employment-population ratio increased significantly to 78.3%. This essentially measures the percent of working-age people who are employed, so it makes for the clearest measure of labor market health.
The number of people employed part-time for economic reasons held steady at 4.4 million, which is close to pre-pandemic levels. This is down dramatically from the record high of nearly 11 million in April of 2020.
The Federal Reserve sets short term interest rates.
But attempts to control long term interest rates are considered "unconventional".
In truth the Fed has full control of short and long term interest rates. The yield curve is merely a policy choice.🧵 apricitas.substack.com/p/the-yield-cu…
America's yield curve has been decreasing and flattening since the Great Recession. That means that short term and long term interest rates are decreasing, and the gap between them is narrowing. To understand why, we have to understand what determines a bond's yield.
Yields can be decomposed into expected short term interest rates plus bond risk premium.
Expected short term interest rates reflect expected future Fed interest rate policy.
Bond risk premiums reflect duration risk (bond price sensitivity to rate changes) and liquidity risk.