I'm trying to figure how how this 'study'--which was a presentation by a Harvard post-doc at a @American_Heart conference, not peer-reviewed--got reported by @NBCNews, @CNN and others. No link provided even to the presentation. Link, anyone? 1/
nbcnews.com/health/health-…
The concl. that sat fats are linked to stroke is contradicted by virtually all other similar studies which have consistently found that more sat fat is assoc. w/ LOWER risk from stroke. This includes the largest such study in the world, called PURE: thelancet.com/article/S0140-…
2/
.@kaitsulliva, could you help with this? 👆
thanks
Here's another one, a review and meta-analysis from Japan, showing greater sat fat consumption associated with LOWER risk of stroke and cerebral hemmorage
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
And a systematic review for the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans found 11 observational studies on sat fats and stroke:
0 (zero) showed that sat fat increases risk of stroke.
3 showed that more sat fat linked to LESS stroke. (see suppl. materials)
mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/1…
Any media on this topic needs to put this latest study by Harvard into this scientific context. Also, the political context: Harvard nutrition dept. has staked out a strong position as advocates for plant-based diet, incl. vege oils. Its findings on fats are outliers, hvr

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nina Teicholz

Nina Teicholz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bigfatsurprise

2 Nov
Super important to consider @CoryBooker @SenateAgDems @SenateAgGOP that our most important govt policy is not evidence-based and does not improve health. Very likely causes harm. This is our government's current policy for prevention and the basis of all federal nutrition prog.
When you talk about disease prevention, this is the government's top policy. It's been followed, yet Americans are not getting healthier.
Why? Bc the advice could not be shown--even in clinical trials--to produce good health. Low-fat diet was shown to INC. risk of heart disease.
These were large clinical trials on >50K people.

So what works to actually swivel diet-related diseases into reverse? Either a permanent starvation diet (not viable) or a diet that restricts all sugars, including foods that turn to sugar upon digestion (grains, fruits).
Read 5 tweets
7 Sep
A recent survey found 42% of adults gained weight during the pandemic: avg. of 29 lbs. 1 in 10 gained 50-plus lbs. Weight gain increases risk of T2 diabetes and other diseases...and also, to poor outcomes for #Covid19 1/
apa.org/news/press/rel…
h/t to @chriskresser for this info
Greatest predictor of hospitalization/death from #Covid other than old-age, is obesity, high avg. blood glucose. A study in JAMA found 63.5% of hospitalizations were due to 4 major metabolic conditions: diabetes, obesity, hypertension, heart failure 2/
ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.11…
Dr. Cucuzella and I wrote about this: "Is it time for a Lockdown on sugar?" 3/
journals.lww.com/cjsportsmed/Ci…
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
It appears there's an effort underway to 'cancel' non-establishment views on nutrition. Seems impossible, yet it's happening. Non-orthodox opinions are being suppressed in many fields-why not nutrition? Hence, a thread for @twitter @facebook @Wikipedia @youtube @instagram etc
On saturated fats, the vast majority of now ~20 review papers on this subject do NOT support continued caps on sat fats. Official guidelines lag behind (as they always have), but the science clearly no longer supports caps on these fats. List of papers: nutritioncoalition.us/saturated-fats… 2/
Most important was a paper on sat fats in the J. of Am. College of Cardiology. Authors included 4 members of previous USDA-HHS Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees, saying, basically, we got it wrong on sat fats: Data do not support continued caps 3/ sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 11 tweets
5 May
Malnutrition among US women. "This is the stuff that keeps me up at night,” says prof. Bailey. And ability to have healthy children? “Going into reproductive age at nutrition risk can cause intergenerational effects"
Important story by @ANDREAAPETERSEN

wsj.com/articles/teen-…
This is a problem not just among teens but women of reproductive age. Slide from a recent talk I gave:
The consequences for children of B12 deficiency
(NIH information)
Read 6 tweets
9 Feb
In the US, "We live shorter, poorer lives" according to a Nat'l Academies' report. The report was called a "catalogue of horrors." Newspapers were "stunned" and "surprised." That was 2013. “As bad as things were then, they’ve only gotten worse,” says Dr. Woolf from @VCUHealth
By 2019, U.S. was 36th in the world on life expectancy at birth, behind Slovenia, Costa Rica. Recent paper found that even privileged whites fare worse on infant mortality, maternal mortality+deaths from heart attacks than avg. citizens of Norway, Denmark+other developed nations
"The troubling portrait of America’s health did not spur action to paint a better one. Two presidential administrations have ignored it, as has Congress" states this article by @undarkmag, looking back at the 2013 report undark.org/2021/02/01/ame… @XavierBecerra
Read 17 tweets
29 Dec 20
Thread Re: #DietaryGuidelines (DGA), just out:

USDA-HHS Secys said they're for “all Americans,” yet the DGA is scoped ONLY for disease prevention, not treatment. This ignores the 60% of US with a diet-related disease. DGA is thus for minority of Americans who are healthy. Image
Congress' statute says the DGA must be for the "general public"--yet clearly majority of Americans now have diet-related diseases. THIS is the general public, yet Guidelines excludes them. DGA process didn't even look at studies on weight loss, when >42% of adults now w/ obesity.
Tagline of this DGA is "make every bite count," yet did not reduce 10% of calories as sugar, as recommended by the expert committee. Sugar is not just 'empty calories'--it raises blood sugar and over time high blood sugars lead to diabetes (+ increase vulnerability to Covid) Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(