What do you call it when you have a formerly normal place where violence is suddenly and inexplicably just "happening," and the law is doing nothing to protect that place and its people from that outbreak of violence?
If the government refuses to protect you from violence, it either lacks the power to protect you, or *wants* you to suffer that violence
In either case, a legitimate government no longer exists. By this "combat veteran's" logic, we are now immediately in fedposting territory
An ideology that refuses to protect you from violence, but then displays that it still has the power to prosecute and destroy you for protecting *yourself* from violence, exposes exactly what it is, and what it intends for you
Progressivism has seized control of every institution. Yet what it has discovered is that whoever is in charge of a "liberal democracy" destabilizes itself by trying to use the direct application of violence
But its enemies still exist. This makes it very, very frustrated
What it has discovered along the course of its march through the institutions, however, is that there is a means of enforcing *indirect* violence:
Anarchotyranny.
That is why the modern prog is *obsessed* with justifying it. That's how it commits violence against its enemies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, this is 100% true. Rosenbaum raped multiple young boys.
After being cut loose from a mental facility, he then went to Kenosha, set fire to property, violently threatened bystanders, and [court testimony that can get you banned]
If he hadn't violently threatened + then assaulted [name redacted], it's almost certain no one would have died that night. All deaths stemmed from Rosenbaum
The questions that need to be answered are why was he let out, + why was he not immediately re-arrested for his new crimes
The answers are all indictments of the regime. That's why the regime had to put [name redacted] on trial
The regime continually commits crimes against its own citizens. So when its own citizens resist these crimes, the people must be made to answer for these crimes instead
After some discussion with him, I think the enjoyment of Dune is directly proportional to whether you think Fellowship was the best or the least of the LOTR trilogy
I go Fellowship. Nemets goes Return of the King. There's a clear aesthetic judgment at play here
ROTK is about the Actions of the Decisive Moment, aka the ultimate climax, what this says about its actors and their values and how they acquit themselves, along with the resulting catharsis that is the consequence of all the things that has led up to this moment
When Theoden shows up to the deciding battle of ROTK, and gives his final speech, this is the most powerful singular moment of the trilogy. You can imagine yourself being goaded into battle by his words. That's incredible cinema and storytelling, total buy-in
The deeply ironic thing here is that the Supreme Court decision which asserted the people have a Constitutional right to privacy with specific regards to the choice to make personal medical decisions free of state interference would be... Roe v. Wade
"States restricting your private right to make a personal medical choice? Oh you better *believe* that's unconstitutional. *The* state *stripping* your private right to make a personal medical choice? Oh you better BELIEVE that's constitutional!"
Like I get all the hypocrisy arguments, this is just about raw power etc, but this is just too funny. These people are a joke, they have no moral authority, any time they point to the Constitution and its law is only made in the attempt to undermine it
Dang I liked Dune. I had the feeling Villeneuve was the guy to pull off how big and foreign the universe is but he created one of the most vivid film-worlds I've ever seen
I liked Bladerunner 2049 a fair bit but didn't *love* it. But something about how he presented that world made me think that if anyone could handle Dune it was him
I read several reviews today to take in the consensus and even the most snark- and irony-poisoned critics who wanted to dislike it could only take a few light swings at it
Because the mood somehow *is* just as cyclopean as its visuals. Far outside what they're used to
Frankly, hiring a few NEETs to maintain a Real History of Current Year would be a better use of money than nearly any other project right now
Both to preserve the true counter-narrative, + simply to maintain the memory of all these events that are so easy to forget in the deluge
Based
Remember that one of the cores of this thing is to exist as a counter-propaganda movement. The 1/6 "insurrection" was fake news from the start, on a level unrivaled outside of the Russian Collusion Hoax
Trust can't be restored within the framework of the regime. It can't allow itself to be reformed, because pulling up any plank of the system undermines nearly every other part of it as well. Reform, for it, is collapse
So its survival requires enforcing complete submission to it
Complete submission is by no means guaranteed, they actually have very little will to use force (so far), and use of force tends to be a failure-mode within democracy, hence "nudges," "policies," and anarcho-tyranny, all forms of hand-washing away responsibility
But as for restoring trust, that simply can't happen within this framework. Coercion is their only remaining option. Engineering and enforcing the fake appearance of trust, to match the rest of the fake and gay regime