Just to clarify my point. Nothing gave more validity to the Islamic rule of Akbar in the mind of Hindu masses than a section of Rajputs coming by his side and sharing power. Before that Delhi sultanate was nothing more Ghazwa bandit gang centered in and around Delhi.
1/2
In the same way, nothing gave more validity to Gandhi's "Sarva Dharma Sambhava", Satyagraha, Ahimsa etc (Christian ideas) as if it comes from the core of Vedas than a section of anglicized Brahmins (employed by Gora) coming by his side preaching as Gandhi's chelas.
2/2
These people (Sekoolar-Savarna) cheated the traditional faith of Hindu masses since eons in Brahmin as a Guru and knower of Shashtras, duped Hindus and sold the rest of the Brahmins (and rest of the Savarnas) to the bastard children of Padres
1/2
in the form of OBC and SC political parties and leaders.
And it's the children of these refuse to learn from the mistakes of their dads and grandpas and nowadays masquerade as Trads with insistence to carry on the legacy of their forefathers.
2/2

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with हिरण्यरेता

हिरण्यरेता Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Hiranyareta

14 Nov
I didn't write this tweet in anger or in hurry. The tweet is born out of lots of reading (of history books), analysis, contemplation, realization, and learning over the years.
1/
It's not a mere coincidence that anti-Brahmin movements of the late 19th century and 20th century never happened in the history of Hindus and India before the arrival of White Christian colonialism.
2/
If Brahmins were really that evil as portrayed by Padres and their colonial narrative then it should have happened many times before too. But there is no proof of any such anti-Brahmin sentiments among middle and lower castes other than Manastarang of Padre taught as fact.
3/
Read 22 tweets
12 Nov
Rahta hai Indore mein, hai journalism ka student. Theke par paisa le ke karta hai propaganda aur wo bhee Congressi Avimukteshwaranand gang ke liye. Aur gyan Abrahamism par.

Problem ye hai ki in logon ki pol kholo to Sanatan dharma, Saadhu-Sant aur Brahmin ki hee badnami hoti hai. Par in besharamon ko koi sharam nahin.

1/3
Kashi ke saare ke saare teerth, kund, Mandir, Math encroach karke commercial property bana diye gaye tab ye Kahan the apne Shashtreeya gyan ko le ke?
2/3

Read 4 tweets
4 Nov
लगे रहे हो ब्राह्मणों और शास्त्र की निन्दा में दयानन्द के पादरी ज्ञान की नौका पर सवार होकर। ब्राह्मणों के द्वार पलने वाले श्वान उन्हीं का जूठा खा के उन्हीं पर भौंकते हैं। निर्लज्ज!!
कम से कम बौद्ध, जैन, चार्वाक, ईसाई, मुसलमान लोगों के पास अपना एक शास्त्र है, उस शास्त्र को अनुभव से जानना वाला आचार्य है। और वह अपने स्थान से वे लोग वैदिक (सनातन धर्म) और उसके वाहक और कर्ता-धर्ता ब्राह्मणों से वे स्पर्धा करते हैं।
1/4
लेकिन ये अनार्य समाजी भाई लोगों के पास न अपना कोई मौलिक शास्त्र और न ही अपना कोई पक्ष। शास्त्र ले लिया ब्राह्मणों से और उसके विवेचन की पद्धति ले ली प्रोटेस्टैन्ट पादरी से।
2/4
Read 5 tweets
2 Nov
Sitaram Goel on his Arya Samaj experience. How Arya Samaj prepares the ground for Abrahmism in long run.

"The Arya Samaj of my young days in the village had three main themes to which they devoted the largest part of their programmes the Muslims, the Sanatanis, the Puranas.
1/3
The Muslims were portrayed as people who could not help doing everything that was unwholesome. The Sanatanist Brahmins with their priestcraft were the great misleaders of mankind.
2/3
And the Puranas, concocted by the Sanatanists, were the source of every superstition and puerile tradition prevalent in Hindu society."
3/3
voiceofdharma.org/books/hibh/ch1…
Read 5 tweets
2 Nov
There is a big difference between saying ब्रह्म takes a from (per the wish of His/Her devotees) like here as Tulsidas says:

अगुन अखंड अनंत अनादी। जेहि चिंतहिं परमारथबादी॥
नेति नेति जेहि बेद निरूपा। निजानंद निरुपाधि अनूपा॥
संभु बिरंचि बिष्नु भगवाना। उपजहिं जासु अंस तें नाना॥
1/
ऐसेउ प्रभु सेवक बस अहई। भगत हेतु लीलातनु गहई॥

or
एक अनीह अरूप अनामा। अज सच्चिदानंद पर धामा ॥
ब्यापक बिस्वरूप भगवाना। तेहिं धरि देह चरित कृत नाना ॥
सो केवल भगतन हित लागी। परम कृपाल प्रनत अनुरागी ॥
2/
and saying only particular form is the ब्रह्म.

पुराणों में जो एक देवता विशेष की महत्ता का निरुपण है (जैसे शिव-पुराण में शिव का और विष्णु पुराण में विष्णु का) वह उपासना दृष्टि से है अर्थात् सापेक्ष है।
3/
Read 30 tweets
31 Oct
This description of Congress-Pasand (read Brahmin Jativaad se peedit) Swami Swaroopananda ji.

"कोई शंकराचार्य हो भी गया और उसकी वाणी पर लोभ, भय, अविवेक, कोरी भावुकता का प्रभाव है तो वह आदि शंकराचार्य के समान मार्ग थोडे़ ही प्रशस्त कर सकता है

1/2
असली शंकराचार्य भी अपने दायित्व का निर्वाह नही कर सकते अगर वह धन और मान की किंकरता मन में पाले हुये हैं और देहात्मभाव से प्रेरित हैं।"

2/2
Congress-Pasand Swami Swaroopananda Ji and some Vaishnava Acharyas signed for the construction of mosque opposite RJB temple. Since Puri Shankracharya Ji opposed it, Swaroopananda Ji created a fake claimant to Puri Peeth on the behalf of his Congressi -Bhakts/Masters.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(