ICYMI: The settlement in the $18 million defamation suit Danielle Kurin filed against me for my truthful reporting on her misconduct is now null and void, but the lawsuit itself has been dismissed with prejudice. Kurin now has bigger problems. michael-balter.blogspot.com/2021/10/metoo-…
Will the Santa Barbara County Sheriff charge Kurin with violating the CA Health and Safety Code for failing to report her finding of human remains for 2 months? michael-balter.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-st…
By violating the agreement we had come to, in which I made a major concession to her in exchange for publication of a document that showed my reporting was right, Kurin has badly damaged her own interests, something she does habitually. This story is far from over.
I will be covering it closely, of course, and I believe eventually other reporters will too. Unfortunately, there are indications that the @ucsantabarbara administration has prohibited the student paper, @dailynexus, from covering it as well.
By giving Kurin tenure and enabling her at every turn, @ucsantabarbara has exposed itself to potential legal liability from the students she has damaged. To my knowledge, there is at least one student who is currently seriously considering filing suit.
On the Jack Cantin case, I have invited Kurin or her attorney to respond to my reporting at the length they wish, with no editing from me. So far no response.
Kurin’s family, notably her father, @smithsonian official Richard Kurin, may have thought they were helping her by paying for lawyers and suing people. But that is not the kind of help she needs, according to many who know her, including from way back in grad school.
Indeed, the number of people who enabled Kurin in her documented misconduct forms a large list. The @ucsantabarbara administrators who had the chance to fire her and didn’t, and now have given her tenure (Chancellor Henry Yang, exec VC David Marshall, et al…
The attorney who served as hired gun and attack dog for 13 months in Kurin v. Balter; the #MeToo advocate who seriously considered testifying for her in the lawsuit, @KateClancy; the @IFRArchaeology and its leaders, @wzzw and Ran Boytner, who failed to inform UCSB…
That her husband had sexually assaulted a student at their field school in Peru and that she had been kicked out of the organization; the board of @ScienceWriters, which allowed itself to be bamboozled by Clancy and a clique in #anthropology into filing ethics charges…
Against the reporter who exposed Kurin, and all right in the middle of the lawsuit, which Kurin and her attorney used to try to discredit the journalist in front of the judge; and others who will be discussed in an upcoming post summarizing all these events.
For those who want to catch up on all events related to my reporting on Danielle Kurin, this post has the main stories: michael-balter.blogspot.com/2020/11/a-guid…
The culture of corruption at USCB does not begin nor end with Danielle Kurin. There is a long history of shielding abusers while throwing victims under the bus. I will soon write about how UCSB officials, starting with Chancellor Yang, abetted that toxic and shameful culture.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Balter: Vaxxed, masked, and multi-tasked.

Michael Balter: Vaxxed, masked, and multi-tasked. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mbalter

13 Nov
It's extraordinary that the Editor-in-Chief of @sciencemagazine, @hholdenthorp, would write such a biased editorial about a legitimate scientific debate, and one that would show either ignorance of facts, dishonesty about facts, or both. #coronavirus science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
To continue to refer to those who are not satisfied with the natural origins hypothesis for Covid-19 origins, who include leading scientists and science journaists, as "conspiracy theorists" is truly slanderous and not at all in the scientific spirit.
To state that the "virus is almost certainly of zoonotic origin" is to state something that is not scientifically demonstrated, and to pretend evidence exists that does not. Neither hypothesis has any kind of smoking gun evidence behind it.
Read 8 tweets
20 Sep
I recorded last night's special by @drsanjaygupta on the origins of Covid-19 and I am going to watch it shortly. I will Tweet any thoughts I think might be of interest on this story I have been following and commenting on [eg, michaelbalter.substack.com/p/once-upon-a-…] #coronavirus
Good to see @drsanjaygupta mentioning the early obstruction by Chinese officials which has set the stage for pretty much everything that followed in this controversy.
Also good to point out Daszak’s conflicts of interest early, and the importance of the Lancet letter in Feb 2020. That also set the stage, the “political tone” as their reporter says.
Read 22 tweets
9 Jul
Science journalists have done a great service by telling the public when the science is "settled," eg around climate change, the theory of evolution, etc. Those are areas in which there is a real scientific consensus. They do a disservice when they become advocates...
for one side or the other of a debate in which the science is not settled and there is no consensus. We are seeing way too much of that with the lab-leak hypothesis, in some cases outright cheerleading by science journalists and loose use of the term "conspiracy theory."
I taught science #journalism to grad students at two major universities for a number of years, and while we dissected false notions of "objectivity" we never said it was okay to become advocates for positions that have very little evidence either way. The pendulum...
Read 5 tweets
8 Jul
I’ve now had a chance to read this piece in @bmj_latest by @thackerpd. A really good overview of where the #media, especially mainstream science #journalism, went wrong in its coverage of the Covid-19 origins issue from the very beginning. bmj.com/content/374/bm…
The subtitle, “did the media fall victim to a misinformation campaign?” Captures part of the problem; but the other part is that some reporters have now become part of the misinformation campaign, in the sense that they have become cheerleaders for the natural origins...
Hypothesis despite the clear lack of convincing evidence for either of the two leading hypotheses (natural origins vs. lab leak.) Also, too many reporters are still either overlooking or deliberately ignoring the considerable evidence that China has engaged in a...
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(