City climate plans that do not involve massive and rapid building — tons of new housing for all incomes and household types, low-carbon infrastructure, streetscape investments, and real ruggedization measures — are just urban planning triangulation.
They allow planners and their constituencies to feel virtuous about embracing the big goal of climate action (or climate justice), then make small steps into evidence of commitment.
They defend rent-seeking and opportunity-hoarding behaviors from demands for disruptive change.
I'm inclined to think that the biggest ratcheting up we've seen at #COP26 is the increased pace of NDC submissions, which at least carries the possibility of a stronger debate about accelerating progress.
This part
"requests Parties to revisit and strengthen the 2030 targets in their nationally determined contributions as necessary to align with the Paris Agreement temperature goal by the end of 2022"
The "real progress" vs. "blah blah blah" debate is pointless.
The structures we have to pursue climate policy and diplomacy are incapable of delivering rapid and bold action.
Most of those working within them to deliver change are not to blame for the structures themselves.
There is no movement that can be built that is going to pressure those within these systems to move fast enough, in part because these systems are designed to facilitate delay.
Mass movement --> government action/international agreements --> an orderly transition won't happen.
We need to do a much better job at communicating that all good climate futures now involve an absolute fuck-ton of new buildings and major infrastructure investments.
A giant building boom is what successful climate action looks like on the ground.
I mean, I'm a lifetime fan of electrification and demand reduction, and the one billion machines frame is great.
But decarbonizing energy is only one part of the job we face; ruggedizing ourselves will be a bigger and just as pressing task as cutting CO2. saulgriffith.medium.com/one-billion-ma…
Then in the U.S., there's rebuilding all the degraded systems around us, paying off technical debt and deferred maintenance, building out of the current housing shortage, preparing to accommodate millions of new refugees and welcoming 10s of millions of internal climate migrants.
I'm sorry to be impolitic, but, if — in 2021, as the biosphere unravels before our eyes — your call to action is for more dialogue between those seeking to prevent planetary catastrophe and those profiting from it, then YOU are part of the problem that needs to be fixed.
There is no middle ground between predatory delay and action at the pace demanded by the crisis we face.
There's fast enough, and too slow. That's all.
The idea that we should seek out that middle ground is itself a tactic of predatory delay.
So, too, is literally every other aspect of the planetary crisis.
Speed is everything.
Also, it's not just that actions become, of necessity, faster and more disruptive.
It's also that increasingly massive resources must be devoted to ruggedizing in the face of impacts, and ever-greater discontinuities shake society as people and institutions scramble to keep up.