Striking new charts from @ONS on who's not been jabbed - short answer, young people and ethnic minorities (1/?) ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
This is likelihood to have been jabbed for 18-34s and 34-64s
Among 18-34s there's also a clear gender divide. (Yes, men are awful.)
And here are the results for over-64s, though weird stuff happening with the scales/confidence intervals. (Should flag this is all vaxxed/non-vaxxed not boosters etc.)
Most encouraging takeaway for me is still the extraordinarily high level of vaccination among the elderly, who are by far the most vulnerable. But need to keep that up with the boosters.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Colvile

Robert Colvile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rcolvile

10 Nov
Some new stats from @ONS today on energy efficiency of housing which make clear how ambitious/costly Net Zero is going to be in this area. Direction of travel is to ban renting/make mortgages harder below EPC Band C - ie below 69/100 ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati… Image
The FT pointed out a few days ago that bringing all homes up to Band C by the 2035 target would cost £330bn. Ouch. ft.com/content/1d009a…
Even just bringing a home from Band D to Band C costs £6,472 on average, according to Savills - but saves only £179 in energy costs. Some hard decisions ahead about how ambitious we are - and who pays...
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
Fascinating new @CPSThinkTank report out today on the value of university. Worth reading the whole thing but quick thread to summarise (1/?) cps.org.uk/research/the-v…
The university system is a priceless national asset. But there is a significant long tail of courses that aren't delivering for their students - because universities are incentivised to maximise quantity of recruits rather than quality of outcomes for them.
.@TheIFS (who have done a lot of the work on this) estimate that 20% of students are actively worse off financially for going to university. This is obviously concentrated among particular courses/institutions. Here's lifetime return by course
Read 21 tweets
31 Oct
It’s tempting to analyse the Budget as a one-off. But as I argue in my column today, last week was part of an inexorable process - the transformation of Britain into an elderly care system with a state attached. (1/) thetimes.co.uk/article/the-bu…
Part of the story here is obviously about Covid. Like all the rest of us, the state put on weight during the pandemic - and like all the rest of us, it’s finding it hard to lose.
A big part of the jump in spending in the new figures is the Treasury admitting that the pandemic is not a meteor but an asteroid. Under the original plan, departmental spending was meant to drop back to pre-pandemic levels. But (Adam Curtis voice) that was always a fantasy.
Read 17 tweets
30 Oct
I don’t want to say kids have it easy these days, but they let you take out 20 books at the local library. 20! I spent hours of my childhood agonising over which to spend my five precious blue tickets on.
I think it says pretty much everything about me as a child that my starting to go into the local town, and then into Oxford, was driven largely by an overwhelming desire to access bigger library collections.
Wrote about my pash for the village library and its Asterix collection back when the cuts started telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/…
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
The @CPSThinkTank policy team have done a full briefing on the Budget and what it means. The key takeaway? We're entering the age of the trillion-pound state. cps.org.uk/research/budge…
As this chart shows, the Treasury's original plan for spending to fall back to pre-pandemic levels is dead. Instead, Covid (like WW1/2) will result in a step-change not just in debt but spending - with a smaller economy to support it, and hence higher taxes.
By 2025/6, total departmental spending (admittedly in nominal rather than real terms) will be higher than during the pandemic - breaching the £1 trn barrier for the first time. And once you throw in capital spending, we're already there.
Read 4 tweets
27 Oct
Quick thread shamelessly plagiarising/summarising the @OBR_UK's presentation just now (because v interesting). First, GDP forecasts better but still extremely painful.
This is the key slide for me, on which so much else rests - inflation spike expected to subside to a nice neat 2%. Business leaders I've spoken to are sceptical to say the least...
On tax, Sunak is clearly funding the extra spending from his tax rises - but keeping much of the cash back to cut borrowing/as a buffer against instability
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(