There is a wise apocryphal saying often attributed to Keynes: When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do? After yrs of advocating more expansionary fiscal & monetary policy, I altered my view. I believe Admin & Fed. need to further adjust their thinking on inflation.
First, let’s not compound errors that have already been made with far too much fiscal stimulus and overly easy monetary policy by rejecting Build Back Better. The legislation would spend less over 10 yrs than was spent on stimulus in 2021.
Because spending is offset by revenue increases and because it includes measures such as child care that will increase the economy’s capacity. Build Back Better will have only a negligible impact on inflation.
Second, the Administration is making a series of Fed appointments in coming weeks. The president’s choices need to recognize, as Powell has started to do in recent remarks, that the major current challenge for the central bank is containing inflation.
Third, The Fed should signal that the primary risk is overheating and accelerate tapering of its asset purchases. Given the house-price boom, mortgage-related purchases should stop immediately.
Fourth, the administration should signal that a concern about inflation will inform its policies generally. Measures already taken to reduce port bottlenecks may have limited effect but are a clear positive step.
Buying inexpensively should take priority over buying American. Tariff reduction is the most important supply-side policy the administration could undertake to combat inflation.
Excessive inflation and a sense that it was not being controlled helped elect Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, and risks bringing Donald Trump back to power.
While an overheating economy is a relatively good problem to have compared to a pandemic or a financial crisis, it will metastasize and threaten prosperity and public trust unless clearly acknowledged and addressed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@paulkrugman continues his efforts to minimize the inflation threat to the American economy and progressive politics by pointing to the fact that inflation surged and then there was a year of deflation after World War 2.
If this is the best argument for not being alarmed that someone as smart, rhetorically effective and committed as Paul can make, my anxiety about inflation is increased.
Pervasive price controls were removed after the war. Economists know that measured prices with controls are artificial, so subsequent inflation proves little.
John Authers reviews the various measures and arguments used to minimize inflation over the last 9 months and concludes the argument is over. He is right. His piece should be required reading at the Fed Board of Governors, Treasury and White House.
@USTreasury concludes $80B of funding to IRS will result in $400B in additional revenue for IRS over the decade. This is most significant offset in BBB package & one I am thrilled to see included. I have long believed robust attack on tax gap first order for tax reform efforts
If anything, @USTreasury estimates are conservative. @NatashaRSarin and I estimated that a $100B investment in the IRS focused on high-end enforcement (like Admin proposal is) would generate $800B+ over the course of the decade, outside of info reporting, which raises even more.
Our estimates are lower than those of former Commissioners Charles Rossotti and Fred Goldberg ($1.6T), who have also written in this space. shrinkthetaxgap.com/reform-proposa…
When the Administration formulated its budget in February, it expected 2 percent inflation in 2021, I was warning about inflation. Their forecast is no longer operative.
In May and June, @SecYellen expressed confidence that inflation would be back to the 2 percent range by late 2021 or early 2022. Now this forecast is no longer operative.
In @CNN interview, @SecYellen asserts twice that inflation has decelerated. This is a bit misleading as the 3 month and 12 month CPI inflation rates are both around 5 percent on an annual basis.
Extraordinary new analysis from @SFFED judges that labor markets are now far tighter than normal, in fact tighter than anytime since 1968. This is a valid inference from the vacancy unemployment ratio on which they rely.
Further the study attributes the tightness dominantly to the multiplier effects of the early 2021 measures, corroborating concerns some of us had at the time.
Remarkably, despite rejecting the prevailing Fed view that slack remains a primary concern, the authors manage to be serene about inflation. Never before has the late 1960s been suggested as a time of successful macro management.
Congratulations to @POTUS@JoeBiden and @SecYellen and the many dedicated people who have been working for years on today’s global tax agreement –- probably the most significant international economic agreement of the 21st century.
This agreement establishes a profoundly important principal: countries should cooperate to raise corporate taxation, not compete and race to reduce to it.
Workers around the world will be better off because of this historic achievement that will enable tax burdens to be placed where they should be placed: on those most able to pay.