Congratulations to @POTUS@JoeBiden and @SecYellen and the many dedicated people who have been working for years on today’s global tax agreement –- probably the most significant international economic agreement of the 21st century.
This agreement establishes a profoundly important principal: countries should cooperate to raise corporate taxation, not compete and race to reduce to it.
Workers around the world will be better off because of this historic achievement that will enable tax burdens to be placed where they should be placed: on those most able to pay.
This is a triumph of general interests over special interests, of the denizens of Detroit over the denizens of Davos.
It is a template for much more that needs to be done with respect to the consequences of the adverse side effects of mobile, global capital.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The banking industry’s desire for sympathetic treatment by government would stand on much firmer ground if not for its own form of radicalism.
In particular, consider its demagoguery on the simple issue of information-reporting to improve tax compliance. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Here are the facts: Where there is information-reporting to the govt on taxable payments — as w workers’ W-2s detailing wages or 1099s that savers receive reporting on interest accrued — the IRS collects more than 95% of taxes owed, with minimal reliance on intrusive audits.
Where there is no such information-reporting, as w proprietorship income deposited at financial institutions, tax compliance is much worse — below 50%.
Abusive shelters that go undetected or get permitted are the cousin of tax non compliance. This important @nytimes article points up part of the reason they happen. nytimes.com/2021/09/19/bus…
Future investigations should note revolving door issues with congressional staff, and the issues around highly dubious opinion letters supporting shelters.
The old chestnut that the real scandal is not the illegal things people do, rather it’s what is legal pointed up by the article and highlighted by the Ways and Means mark up. Carried interest not touched. Like kind exchanges continue. Stepped up basis lives on.
My interview with @Noahpinion where we discuss the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the threat of inflation, economic policy priorities and the culture of the economic profession.
I am confident that any reasonable observer will conclude that the constraints on stimulus proposed & enacted were political rather than economic in '08/'09. This view is supported by the fact that Congress cutback the Admin's proposals before passing them by a razor thin margin.
My arguments re: inflation do not derive from a specific econometric model. I believe the problem with much of the conventional wisdom is that models fit to the last 40 years of data, where inflation has never accelerated, will almost definitionally yield complacent conclusions.
More vaccination is necessary for Covid control. I am not convinced of its sufficiency. There is a critical go forward role for testing and isolating the infected and for masking. We can all rejoin the world but for a time not on the same terms as before.
I am a non-alarmist who is proud of not getting spun up by anecdotes to become fearful. But I found @DLeonhardt's @nytimes complacency regarding risks to the vaccinated to be typical of widespread views and dangerously misplaced.
At the 1/5000 daily probability @DLeonhardt estimates the chance that a close relative (nephew most distant counted) will get Covid in next 6 months is two thirds.
.@nytimes@bencasselman@jeannasmialek write interesting article stressing distinctions btw 1960s when inflation accelerated & present moment. In fact, I think most factors point to more cause for concern now than in 1966 when inflation accelerated 3-4 pts in 4 yrs. Consider this
1/Then, the deficit was in range of 3 percent. Now the deficit is in the range of 15 percent.
2/Then, nominal and real interest rates then were significantly positive and Fed has no big balance sheet. Now, nominal rates are essentially 0, real rates are negative and the Fed is growing its balance sheet at a rate of more than a trillion a year.
Today in Venice @Tharman_S@NOIweala & I presented a report to G20 fin. ministers & central bank govs on financing for #pandemicpreparedness. At press conference I said: For none of us is this our first rodeo w a global issue that requires a global collective response. #G20HLIP
For all of us, this is the first time where we have seen one where the expenditure of tens of billions of dollars is likely to prevent the need for spending tens of trillions of dollars down the road.
It is nearly certain we will see another COVID, the question is whether we will as international community be ready.