wait... the prosecutor put the drone footage on a thumb drive to send to the state crime lab but didn't think that's how he should provide it to the defense?? WTF? Now he's blaming the software on Ms. Wisco's phone?! This is disturbing. #Rittenhouse
The defense doesn't have an obligation to ask you for the drone video on a thumb drive or compact disk or floppy disk, Mr. Prosecutor! You have an obligation to give them the EXACT EVIDENCE you received - and the way you do that is a portable storage device and checking file size
I love that the captioning on Law & Crime translates ADA Binger as 88 Banger
Argh! The defense attorneys should have been making a motion to dismiss! The judge can't rule on what you don't ask for! (Well, yes, there are times he can, but this is much safer)
Oh, NOW the prosecutors want to put it on a thumb drive. This is totally unacceptable.
Wait - how did they show the jury a video that wasn't marked as an exhibit or accepted into evidence?
Ooh, the Urban Air dude is gonna be in trouble.
Is Rittenhouse's defense team TRYING to give him an ineffective assistance of counsel claim?
Has anyone actually confirmed that Fox News bought the video? If they have, then you have to call them to testify on how they got it. Holy chain of custody issues, Batman!
"The authenticity was stipulated to" - 1) dumbass mistake by defense attys; 2) they didn't have all of the information. And yes, Krauss, it's EXTREMELY prejudicial!
No, Krauss, the responsibility on evidence is completely on YOU
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
