Hold your wild horses before concluding that some VirDas types made an impact on US Travel Advisory to India to Level2. While ThePrint, NDTV writing catchy headlines with "r@pe", the prominent citation in the updated advisory is the civil situation at J&K & Naxal hit areas.. 1/
which is normal for any country to do. Vir Das show was on 13Nov & guidelines were updated on 15Nov. Now suggesting that officials were listening live & updated advry in 2 days is hyper foolish. Read the guidelines, 99% covered with precautions at civil unrest specifics. 2/
Btw, as per US security standards, only 30/212 destinations are Level1 or 2. On the Covid-19 advisory, India moved from Level4 to 1 in the last few months.
As matter of fact, these guidelines keep changing every few months and this is NOT the first time India kept on Level2. 3/
Therefore pls avoid propaganda by selective media that are highlighting 'r@pe' & connecting two events for no reason.
As far as Vir Das is concerned, the fact remains same that VirDasCh**Hai.
4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are lots of emotion outburst on TL, ranging from disappointment to backlashe PM Modi & govt for repealing farm laws. That's nonetheless affirm the expectation from the same govt.
The apprehension are obvious for setting the wrong precedence about other decisive move like Article 370/35A, CAA and so kneeling down to violent street veto. TV debate penalist to prominent pro-govt handlers are critical about deficiency of the move & also it won't help a bit
2/
to score in state elections too. All opinions are important & must be respected.
Now let's take a pause and be reminded of the fact that since day-1 the Modi regime has faced unprecedented challenges, internally and externally, which no other regime has ever.
3/
Farm laws repealed. Quicks:
- honest image of govt that accept comm failure
- one agenda less for opposition.
- will be perceived as propoganda win
- paved way for Cap Amrinder in Punjab
- adverse impact on CAA
Is Halal food just another religious practice or a burden for traders & consumers of a majority of faiths?
Let's take a deep dive into the social & financial implications of 'imposed compliance' and the larger objective of Jamiat which governs this exercise.
Read on.. 1/n
Let’s start with the basics.
The Arabic word ‘halal’ means permitted/allowed and so the ‘halal food’ implied is permissible under Islamic Sharia laws. The opposite of halal is haram i.e. unlawful. Look at Pic of various methods of slaughtering cattle. 2/n
If you are not comfortable with this part, skip next 2 tweets.
So, the Islamic form of slaughtering animals is killing the animal through a cut to the jugular vein, carotid artery & windpipe with a sharp blade which animal haven’t seen. Then let the animal hang upside down 3/