Completely unconnected with events unfolding in eastern Europe. Of course! you say. Except it's not. Because if the unthinkable happens, then @DFCavalryCorps could be engaging with Russian VDV, marines and GRU spetsnaz on Irish soil as early as summer 2022. A scenario: 1/🧵
How so? you ask. Russia appears intent on invading Ukraine. Ukraine will fight, Russia can't afford to lose, war will spread, NATO forces are likely to be drawn in if combat crosses Ukraine's borders into NATO countries. But that's nowhere near Ireland! you say. However. 2/
A conventional war between Russia and Allied (Ukraine, US, EU, NATO) forces on the eastern flank will automatically bring into play the western Atlantic flank of Europe: Ireland's controlled air, sea and land territory is one-fifth of that flank. It will be contested space. 3/
To put it simply, any large-scale war in Europe will require transatlantic resupply and reinforcements from the US and Canada. Russia will do everything it can to slow, hinder and prevent that by controlling the airspace and sea space (surface and subsurface) west of Ireland. 4/
Russian submarines plus surface ships and aircraft missile platforms would attempt to sink shipping and down Allied aircraft. But Allied navies & air forces would attempt to kill Russian platforms. Therefore, Ireland's landmass would come into play out of strategic necessity. 5/
But Ireland is neutral (or at least non-aligned)! you cry. Ukraine was in effect neutral before 2014. Didn't stop Russia from going to war there, did it. Do you really think the Putin regime, which doesn't hold back from bombing hospitals in Syria, would spare Ireland? 6/
You may not like to hear it, but there are three primary strategic targets (plenty more secondary ones) that feature in Russian General Staff planning for the Atlantic flank or theatre of war: Shannon Airport, Cork Harbour and Berehaven Harbour. Why these? you ask. 7/
Shannon Airport because it is a known transit infrastructure for NATO troops crossing the North Atlantic. Denial of it to NATO is a high priority. Plus, Shannon Airport could serve as a base for Russian Il-78 aerial refueling tankers to service long-range aviation. 8/
Cork Harbour because it is a sheltered and defensible deep-water anchorage: Russia would ensure it is denied to Allied navies and merchant ships. It could be used to service Russian Navy vessels. Haulbowline Naval Base would be useful infrastructure to control. 9/
Berehaven Harbour in West Cork (Bantry Bay) likewise is a deep-water and defensible anchorage. Denying oppositional use and retaining it for shelter for Russian naval operations west of Ireland. Berehaven was used by US Navy and Royal Navy last century. 10/
There are other potential targets for Russian seize-hold operations across Ireland's west, including other airfields, harbours, oil storage depots etc. 11/
Any ops would require relatively small numbers of troops (50-200 per target) making such tasks ideal for Russian Airborne (VDV) and Naval Infantry (marines) plus intelligence special forces (GRU spetsnaz). How they get here without being shot down or sunk is another matter. 12/
But our Defence Forces can deal with 200 Russians! you say. First, it will be more likely 1,500 (ish) troops inserted over several strategic locations. The Russians will fight, using offshore and stand-off missile platforms if they meet resistance. This raises some questions: 13/
First, assuming that Russian Armed Forces have the element of surprise (shock due to "neutrality" and unpreparedness) and seize all their intended objectives, do the Irish Defence Forces have enough troops to counter such operations? Do they have the capabilities? 14/
Will Government give orders to engage in combat? The kill ratio will be heavily in favour of the Russian occupiers. Would Government allow 10, 100, 1000 or more Defence Forces casualties? Or would Government in effect capitulate to prevent loss of lives (incl civilians)? 15/
I think you already suspect the answers. You are not alone. Russian General Staff planners update their plans with daily intelligence gathered along the entire Atlantic flank, from Norway to Portugal. They long ago identified Ireland is the key vulnerability or weak spot. 16/
Russia's Embassy in Dublin reports back regularly to Moscow (the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defence) with assessments of the public mood, Government's resolve and Defence Forces' capabilities. We all know that the Irish undervalue defence, which is almost non-existent. 17/
So, you might expect NATO flights and ships to reroute to avoid Irish controlled waters and airspace? Not so easy when there's a war going on. Or Britain's Royal Air Force and Royal Navy to protect us? They may be preoccupied with their own fights elsewhere. 18/
There's no certainty about this scenario, though it is a well planned, wargamed and red-teamed scenario on both sides. Apart from the likelihood of the entire Atlantic flank of Europe becoming hotly contested space in the event of war. That means Ireland too. End/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andy Scollick

Andy Scollick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Andy_Scollick

19 Nov
Vice President of the Russian International Affairs Council (Putin's Moscow think tank), Lieutenant-General (Reserves) Evgeny Buzhinsky, said how "Ukrainian troops will be destroyed" No tank armies, the Aerospace Forces will do everything. 1/ mk.ru/politics/2021/…
Buzhinsky said the war against Russia "is already underway." Yes, there is no "hot" war yet, but there is an informational, economic, trade and sanctions war going on. The number of cyberattacks on Russian systems is in the thousands. 2/
Speaking about the Russian military groupings on Russia's western borders, Buzhinsky expressed confidence that a sufficient grouping of forces has been created. 3/
Read 6 tweets
19 Nov
I spent a significant part of the last 7 years guiding young officers of Ukraine's Armed Forces through exercises aimed at thinking: call it resilience, systems, outside the box, strategic, whatever, but thinking. Question your assumptions. How does your enemy think? Etc
Rarely do I encounter the level of arrogance and inability to recognise one's own biases, which affect one's judgement and decision making, that I have just experienced coming from a LSE PhD candidate who wrote an article in @ForeignPolicy.
Are we devaluing PhDs? Are we allowing people to get away with bad analysis and advice? Is it right that someone should use their academic position to foist a potentially incorrect and very dangerous view on the public (in this case through @ForeignPolicy) that could result in..
Read 4 tweets
18 Nov
Joe Murray, coordinator of 🇮🇪 NGO @AfriPeace, is correct in stating that the global defence sector (militaries, industry and ministries) have a large carbon footprint. However, he is disingenuous in using that fact to undermine Ireland's defence sector. 🧵irishexaminer.com/opinion/commen…
First, the militaries of the US, UK, Netherlands, Slovenia, New Zealand, Ireland and others are leading efforts to decarbonise bases, operations and vehicles in order to reduce their carbon footrprints in line with public sector "net zero" targets. This will be evident at #COP27
It's early days, but their ambitions are genuine: reducing reliance on fossil fuels has significant cost savings and operational advantages as well as addressing national climate action responsibilities. Soldiers have families too. No one wants climate change.
Read 12 tweets
18 Nov
"Russia's harsh response - after Hultqvist's message"

Swedish troops can train in Ukraine in the future, according to Minister of Defense Peter Hultqvist.

Now the Russian embassy is responding - with a reference to the battle of Poltava in 1709. expressen.se/nyheter/ryssla… 1/
"Poltava's descendants, however, do not seem to have learned proper lessons from past battles with Russia, which has already overthrown Sweden from its great power heights," the embassy wrote on Facebook. 2/
On Tuesday, Hultqvist told Swedish Radio Ekot that Sweden may participate in military exercises in Ukraine, which is in conflict with Russia.

The Baltic countries proposed the exercise, after reports came in that Russia had equipped itself at the border with Ukraine. 3/
Read 7 tweets
16 Nov
Peddling the Moscow-Minsk line that poor old Lukashenko's border troops and KGB goons "can't control the crowds .. it's anything but orchestrated" - a narrative currently emerging across LukaPutin social media channels. 🍸🥒
Read 5 tweets
16 Nov
Entretien téléphonique avec M. Vladimir Poutine, Président de la Fédération de Russie 🇫🇷 (Telephone interview with Mr. Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation) via @Elysee elysee.fr/emmanuel-macro…
❗️Absolutely nothing about Macron telling Putin that #France with defend the territorial integrity of #Ukraine

Google translation 🇬🇧 www-elysee-fr.translate.goog/emmanuel-macro…
Macron 'expressed to his counterpart his deep concern over developments in the Ukrainian situation. He encouraged his counterpart to play a constructive role within the framework of the Normandy format, by rapidly resuming the dialogue likely to reduce tensions.'
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(