Tweet

More from @Saintonge235

Stephen St. Onge

22 Nov

https://twitter.com/MaryLemanski/status/1462765074486108170

And this stinking pile of 💩 reveals her inner nature. She is full of resentment and envy, and took the opportunity of a horrific quintuple murder to display what she thought was wit.

Truly #evil. Utterly #disgusting. The Twitter rules prevent me saying more.

https://twitter.com/MaryLemanski/status/1462765074486108170

And look at THIS imbecility, where she can't understand what she did wrong, and says her remarks were in "bad taste." As if anybody on Twitter cared about taste.

Note also how she tries to cover herself with "free speech," and how her "accepting responsibility" lie

@tweettruth2me

is contradicted by the whining in the tweet above.

Let's look at her "bad taste." Here's one example, which she has since deleted. "No one" @tweettruth2me tweeted : "When your political ideology means more to you than human life, you have lost your way." Lemanski's reply:

Read 10 tweets

Stephen St. Onge

@Saintonge235

22 Nov

@CarlosLozadaWP

The #WaPo has a decent review of "The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story," the new book based on the notorious #NYTimes Sunday Magazine articles.

Reviewer @CarlosLozadaWP notes the basic dishonesty of the project, where criticisms are met by changing the definitions of words.

For instance, when Nikole Hannah-Jones says blacks fought for their rights "alone," that doesn't mean "Without aid or support," or "Without anyone else." It means "without the support of the majority of white Americans."

This is dubious as stated (did the majority of whites oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or the Voting Rights Act of 1965? If answering, please present evidence). It is also irrelevant. A minority of white Americans has always fought for black rights. NHJ lies about this.

Read 10 tweets

Stephen St. Onge

@Saintonge235

20 Nov

https://twitter.com/charlesarthur/status/1462044263592701955

#Propaganda #protip: This is an example of #IntellectualBaitAndSwitch. And a typical #gamma move.

Mr. Arthur asked " Is there any real difference between [Rittenhouse] and a child soldier on the Ethiopian border?" I replied, showing some of the differences.

https://twitter.com/charlesarthur/status/1462044263592701955

Now he opines about "well-trained militia(s)", trying to imply that this has some bearing on his initial question. It's like pointing out that Ethiopian child soldiers and Rittenhouse both are members of the human species. True, but it has no bearing on the subject.

It's a typical gamma move in that gammas can't bring themselves to admit they made a mistake. Instead of acknowledging that his initial wisecrack was wrong, he has to find something else he can claim to be right about, and tell himself it cancels his previous error.

Read 4 tweets

Stephen St. Onge

@Saintonge235

4 Nov

@robkhenderson

@robkhenderson .Evolution does something? How can it, unless objective reality exists?

And the "computer simulation" is bullshit. One computer "organism" can see "objective reality" but can't recognize danger, but another can see "danger" but not the computerized "reality"?

@robkhenderson

@robkhenderson Within the context of the simulation, recognizing "this will kill me" is recognizing "reality."

This is another example of people proving 2+2 can equal five, by substituting other numbers for 2. It's just dishonest.

Then there's the perception nonsense.

@robkhenderson

@robkhenderson ‘In like manner, we create an apple when we look, and destroy it when we look away. Something exists when we don’t look, but it isn’t an apple, and is probably nothing like an apple,’ Hoffman writes.”

No, we see an apple. This is just being systematically dishonest.

Read 10 tweets

Stephen St. Onge

@Saintonge235

2 Nov

Reading ‘When the Culture War Comes for the Kids’, archive.md/gznDx, and I find this: “Liberals are always slow to realize that there can be friendly, idealistic people who have little use for liberal values.”

This is a subset of a larger problem, IMAO: Projection.

A lot of people just can’t grasp, emotionally, that some people want different things than they do, like or dislike different things, and will do different things given the opportunity. And so they operate on false assumptions. Grief inevitably ensues.

There's a worse problem.

Call it self blinding. Call it refusal to face facts. The article talks about how the author’s son got into a good middle school, but it turned out to be ‘segregated.’

You mean children were assigned to this school on the basis of their race, and it was all one race. Nope.

Read 8 tweets

Stephen St. Onge

@Saintonge235

22 Oct

https://twitter.com/Deevoee/status/1451650963123671051

More Deevoe idiocy, three different tweets.

1) I was aware the SRO was a deputy. It's in the original Daily Wire story that I have quoted from.

2) He's now making up 🐴💩 about "you guys" making a claim that the cops weren't called until the second incident. Roll tape:

https://twitter.com/Deevoee/status/1451650963123671051

Zaid Jilani notes an email Supt. Ziegler sent out the same day as the first incident. Deevoe replied with a quote from the letter.

I replied to Deevoe, incorrectly, "The Sheriff's Dept. was apparently not notified till Scott Smith showed up at the school to complain."

But my tweet did say that the Sheriff's dept. was notified the same day as the alleged rapes occurred. So I never made the claim he wishes to pin on me.

3) I never said or implied that the Sheriff was trying to cover anything up. That's just more 🐴 💩

Read 6 tweets

Share this page!

Stephen St. Onge

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @Saintonge235

Stephen St. Onge

Stephen St. Onge

Stephen St. Onge

Stephen St. Onge

Stephen St. Onge

Stephen St. Onge

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Like this author's thread?