The news about the planned Russian military attack on Ukraine end January-early February continues to come from all kind of sources. You don't announce a war 3 months ahead unless you enjoy enormous overweight as the US did in the Gulf and Iraq wars.
Instead, I think the Kremlin is checking the many weaknesses of the West and will hit where these weaknesses ar the greatest, and there are so many soft targets or low-hanging fruits.
Closest to my interests, Europe has made so many mistakes in its energy policies, so why not let them fail: Too small reserves, uncertain supply contracts, vulnerable markets leading to both shortages & high prices, ultimately breaking up the EU market model.
In Ukraine, the Zelensky government is embarrassed by Wagnergate and it has been unable to offer any credible defense. The Ukrainian government seems set to weaken. The Kolomoisky & Firtash dramas can only improve the Russian situation. Ultimately, can Zelensky handle this?
Putin wants to have Nord Stream 2 swiftly certified, but by doing so just too blatantly, I would not be surprised if he has blown his hand. After all, Germany is about to get a new, more innocent, government (which I appreciate).
Putin has so many other intrigues going on, such as hurting Moldova, forcing Serbia into the Russian orbit, cutting off Viktor Orban from the EU, that he is just overloading his hand, being too clever by half.
My optimistic guess is:
1. NS2 will never be certified for many good reasons.
2. The EU will reinforce its gas and electricity market policies of 2009 with more reserves.
3. Russia will lose the confidence of its EU gas clients.
Extortion is not a good business model.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anders Åslund

Anders Åslund Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anders_aslund

21 Nov
Suddenly, Washington's many pro-Putin advocates have presented a flow of articles arguing that the West should stop supporting Ukraine & instead listening to Putin's wise advice. One of the worst is Rand's Samuel Charap, so let us check his arguments.
politico.com/news/magazine/…
1. Charap claims that the US policy of offering "sticks to Moscow and carrots to Kyiv" has failed. Western sanctions and mainly US military support stopped the Russian military expansion in Ukraine from February 2015. That is not bad, but Charap clearly wants more for Moscow...
2. Charap continues "The risk of a major war seems real enough to justify a new U.S. approach. The current policy of threatening punishments and bolstering Kyiv might be morally justified, but it is highly unlikely to alter Putin’s calculus." Charap wants the US to abandon peace?
Read 9 tweets
20 Nov
I am amazed by all these pro-Putin characters in Washington who know little or nothing about Russia & even less about Ukraine. They call for Western appeasement with Russia & agitate against Western sanctions against Russia & military support for Ukraine. They are all wrong.
1. Ukraine persisted against Putin's explicit claim that he would capture half the country (April 17, 2014) for two reasons: A. Ukraine's impressive military defense. B. United Western sanctions against Russia from July 2014. Our report with @MSnegovaya.
atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-resea…
2. Repeatedly, Russia has mobilized its troops around Ukraine, but on the most important occasion, key Ukraine allies, notably the US, has raised their voice & Russia has stayed away. My sense is that is the case right now.
atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainea…
Read 4 tweets
18 Nov
Putin gave his annual speech to the Russian ambassadors today. To my mind, it is the most defensive speech I have read of Putin. All is wrong, but naturally nothing is his fault.
en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
1. The top concern is Ukraine: "Ukraine’s internal crisis is among the most pressing and sensitive issues for us...Demonstratively, Ukraine has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Minsk Package of Measures, as well as the Normandy format agreements."
2. Alas, "[Germany and France] are indulging the current Kiev leadership’s course on dismantling the [Minsk agreements], which, unfortunately, has led the talks and the settlement itself into a dead end...it is important to energetically continue the mediation efforts..."
Read 16 tweets
13 Nov
The Kremlin is instigating a perfect storm in Eastern Europe as the winter is approaching: Gas war, Migrant war of Belarus against Poland, Lithuania & Latvia, military mobilization around Ukraine & possible Serb Republic secession in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Thanks @tashecon
The West, the EU, UK & US, need to act hard & fast. The worst provocation against Russian aggression is not to react or to react slowly. The Kremlin does respect force & credible threat of force.
1a. The gas war should be easy to combat: Just impose the legislated US sanctions on Nord Stream 2 AG & the pipeline will rust away in the Baltic Sea & never certify it.
Read 12 tweets
6 Nov
Kyiv Post summarizes the Zelensky government circus: "The process of hiring and firing top officials under Zelensky has been chaotic....The disarray delayed crucial reforms in key government sectors, such as defense and medical procurement."
kyivpost.com/ukraine-politi…
2. "Moreover, some ministers have left a dubious trail, with the National Anti-Corruption Bureau opening probes into corruption and abuse of office."
“They don’t have a strategy, no one knows why people are hired or fired,"
3. Lawmaker Mykyta Poturaev, who represents Zelensky’s party: “Taran — ineffective, Uruskiy — ineffective, Lyubchenko — corruption, Abramovsky — the inability to combat corruption,”
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
Politico has published the long-discussed Biden invitation list to the Summit for Democracy, December 9-10. On the whole it makes a lot of sense. It contains 107 countries, slightly more than half of the world, while Freedom House ranks 91 democracies.
politico.com/f/?id=0000017c…
2. Also some tiny democracies (Liechtenstein, St. Kitts etc.) included by Freedom House are ignored by the US. All sizable Freedom House democracies have been invited. The key question is: What unworthy countries have been included?
freedomhouse.org/countries/free…
3. Three countries stand out as rightly ranked as "not free" by Freedom House, namely Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo & Iraq. These countries do not belong to a democracy summit.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(