Producing more revenue and better margins than the consensus estimates.
3/n
$NTNX
* Revenue: $378.5M vs 369M
* EPS: -$0.22 vs -0.34
Guidance:
* Q2 Revenue: $405M vs $400M est.
* Full Year Revenue: $1.62B vs $1.6B est.
4/n
$NTNX
* Gain / Loss from Operations Margin (non-GAAP):
-11.1% vs -17.6% est
5/n
$NTNX
* Free cash flow: -1.9M vs -37.3M est
6/n
$NTNX
Strong
In total:
* Revenue: $378.5M vs 369M est
* EPS: -$0.22 vs -0.34
* Operating Margin: -11.1% vs -17.6%
* Free Cash Flow: -1.9M vs -37.3M
* ACV Billings: $183.3M vs $175.7
Guidance:
* Q2 Revenue: $405M vs $400M est.
* Full Year Revenue: $1.62B vs $1.6B est.
7/n
$NTNX
Most importantly, with revenue growth converging to ACV billings growth, and all of that guided to 25% in a few years, we are pleased to see that full year guidance is in fact for 25% growth this year.
...
8/n
$NTNX
And, finally, this is the first time the company has guided actual revenue growth (as opposed to just ACV billings) in a long-time and that reads as a signal to us that the CEO and CFO do believe that visibility is increasing and their goals are attainable.
9/9
$NTNX
While there are a lot of numbers, we just care that the company is building credibility, because if credibility is reached then all of a sudden we are looking at a software company headed to 25% revenue CAGR, turning free cash flow positive and priced at 3x 2023 sales
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I won't share others' private stuff, but I had a response that will likely give you the flavor.
...
1/n
In the trading business they say you have to blow out three times to really make a career.
It's just a saying, but the point is, you never really turn into an investor or a trader until you ...
/2
... see a drawdown, panic about it, make mistakes with it, blame somebody else for it (like market makers or short sellers or whatever) and finally, just don't care about it.
It has to become numb for proper behavior on the upside and the downside.
$ONDS First Class 1 Rail signed (there are seven). This is enormous.
They move as a group. This is a natural oligopoly (that's the good kind).
This is, IMHO, absolutely the beginning of the full network.
So...
/1
This is the start of the $225M initial build out.
This is how:
* 140,000 miles of freight rail track.
* A base station every 22 miles.
* That's 6,300 base stations (those towers near stations) to be served with the heavier duty Ondas FullMAX gear, yielding $90M.
...
2/n
* 40,000 waysides (the little huts near train stations). These would start with Ondas' "Venus," yielding $100M.
* 65,000 crossings (the DING DING DING arms) in U.S. About half are electrified. Those would probably take Ondas' Mercury. That's 32,500 crossings for $32.5M.
3/n
Ondas Network and Siemens Mobility launched the Airlink family of radios including completion of our first joint development program for the 900 MHz railroad band.
3/N
$ONDS
Secured its first commercial 900 MHz Rail Order from Siemens Mobility for a major Class I Railroad for delivery by year-end.