An extract from the (future) Covid Inquiry:
Q: Prime Minister, now that we have established that you decided not to mitigate the spread of Covid-19 and allowed the virus to spread freely, can I ask, what provisions did you make to provide care for those who would become infected?
PM: Well, eh…the..NHS. Our fantastic NHS… was poised and ready to treat the sick.
Q: But was the NHS not already beyond safe bed occupancy levels when you decided to lift mitigation strategies?
PM: Ahh, but the NHS had over 6,000 beds available, and no patient was ever refused treatment.
Q: According to the government's own data, at the time you ordered the lifting of social restrictions did the NHS not have LESS capacity than before the pandemic struck?
PM: Well, I don’t know the exact numbers…but we had expanded bed capacity through the Nightingale hospitals…and as I say no patient was refused treatment.
Q: We are discussing what the situation was at the time you ordered a lifting of all restrictions PM, not April 2020.
Q:..After allowing this novel coronavirus to spread unmitigated through the British people during a period when the NHS was smaller and weaker than before the pandemic, did we not experience record waiting times in A&E, the longest waiting list in NHS history, people dying in...
ambulances,..in short, patients unable to get care, Prime Minister?
PM: No. No. Not all. I was assured by [enter name of patsy] we had enough capacity for the less than 10% rise in admissions, and I am assured that no patient was refused care when they needed it.
Q: So, you made no provisions to treat the inevitable increase in severe Covid-19 cases when you decided to let 'it rip' through society, and in fact, lifted all mitigations at a time when the NHS was already overwhelmed and people were struggling to get the care they needed...?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Johnson Legacy:
"Pursuing a mass infection policy while refusing to provide the treatment needed for those infected."
The fact this is happening is irrefutable.
But why refuse to strengthen the NHS during a pandemic?
And is there time for the PM to change this legacy?
Things are a bit hazy just now. We are all reeling from a difficult 20 months. Most are fed-up with Covid-19. And many have realised the damaging secondary impacts of the measures implemented to control it. Popular sentiment bastes in this recent trauma.
Popular sentiment will change. Indeed, for PMs in office during major historical events their legacy takes on a different quality. And I think few will argue the Covid pandemic is the most historical event since WW2. It is certainly killing more civilians.
The PM embarked on ‘freedom day’ without making provision to treat the inevitable increase in severely unwell cases. Just pause for a moment and consider that…
The UK has less inpatient capacity than before the pandemic. Freedom day has led to so much Covid Pneumonia it has TRIPLED the healthcare burden from 'normal' pneumonia - one of the highest burden diseases in the UK - and still the capacity of the NHS is less.
Thanks for all the support raising awareness for the NHS and Covid-19 🙏🏼
I hope you will now permit me to share my academic side with you. I promise it won't be (too) boring.
It tells the story of the pandemic response from a certain perspective. It starts in April 2020..
Early Intervention
Witnessing the 'hands-off' approach being taken by the UK (and US) to patients with Covid-19, we wrote this opinion article to remind our colleagues that we don't need a 'magic bullet' to save lives. Best Supportive Care matters!
This line became quite useful:
"The battle for lives will likely be won in the community. It is the community doctors, the paramedics and the emergency department staff who will shift the balance and save most lives..."
The public should exercise the same judgement for who and when to contact if they are concerned as they did prior to the pandemic. Waiting until severely unwell neither helps patient or health service.
The majority of Covid-19 resolves without event. Typical symptoms are similar to the cold or flu and tend to start improving after two or three days.