Why is Germany’s Covid-19 response killing less civilians than the UK’s?

Germany has not done particularly well. Yet, at a population level their death toll is about half that of the UK.

Thread 1/12
#COVID19
And their excess mortality is a fraction of the UK’s:
[UK = 11% excess deaths, Germany = 3%]
What this highlights is that the overall strategy employed by Germany has saved a lot more lives than the UK’s strategy.

And may have saved much more of the economy:
In part this has been by employing more mitigation against community transmission. Lowering the total number of infections:
But even when total case numbers were similar (up to around November 2020), the difference in mortality was stark:

➡️ 14k deaths in Germany.
➡️ 54k deaths in the UK.
It helps that Germany started off with more GPs than the UK:

[Germany has 50% more GPs]
And that Germany have more hospital capacity:

Germany has over 200% more beds per head of population than the UK. (Yes, two-hundred percent more)

UK = 2.4 beds per 1,000 people
Germany = 7.9 beds per 1,000 people.

data.oecd.org/chart/6xk7
More doctors and more space to treat the sick. Perhaps little surprise that less people died.

Perhaps Germans value healthcare more than the Brits:

Germany = 11.38% GDP
UK = 10% GDP

Germany = £4.3k per person per year
UK = £3k per person per year
But, perhaps one of the greatest ‘life-saving’ difference is that Germany took a more (not ideal, but more) PROACTIVE clinical approach to COVID-19 cases. That is, they left LESS patients at home without medical help.
Germany triaged around 85% of patients in the community.
Germany strengthened their healthcare services during the pandemic.
The UK opted not to triage patients at the point of diagnosis and the UK shrunk their health service.
Germany has not done particularly well. We should be discussing Norway and Singapore and trying to emulate their responses. But given the disastrous UK pandemic response and how far away we are from basic international standards, perhaps we should take baby steps.
It is not difficult to save lives and the economy. We just need to do the basics:
▪️identify the sick.
▪️treat the sick.
▪️stop others getting sick.
It's not difficult science to follow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Dan Goyal

Dr Dan Goyal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @danielgoyal

27 Nov
The dangers of misunderstanding the comparison between FLU and COVID-19.

There have been significant misinterpretations of the FLU death numbers. For some this has justified a "covid is not that bad" mentality. The dangers of group-think, once again.

1/n
#COVID19
#MedTwitter
Covid and flu can both cause viral pneumonia. Both can lead to secondary bacterial pneumonia.
But the direct death rate of each is:
Flu = 4/day
Bacterial Pneumonia = 55/day
Covid = 125/day (at CURRENT rates!)

ONS: Image
Most of us experience FLU as an unpleasant but rarely serious illness. This remains true for those of us working in acute medicine - we rarely see a flu pneumonia.
We do see a lot of bacterial pneumonia and now Covid pneumonia.

[Thanks to @jneill for graphic] Image
Read 14 tweets
24 Nov
An extract from the (future) Covid Inquiry:
Q: Prime Minister, now that we have established that you decided not to mitigate the spread of Covid-19 and allowed the virus to spread freely, can I ask, what provisions did you make to provide care for those who would become infected?
PM: Well, eh…the..NHS. Our fantastic NHS… was poised and ready to treat the sick.

Q: But was the NHS not already beyond safe bed occupancy levels when you decided to lift mitigation strategies?
PM: Ahh, but the NHS had over 6,000 beds available, and no patient was ever refused treatment.

Q: According to the government's own data, at the time you ordered the lifting of social restrictions did the NHS not have LESS capacity than before the pandemic struck?
Read 7 tweets
22 Nov
The Johnson Legacy:
"Pursuing a mass infection policy while refusing to provide the treatment needed for those infected."
The fact this is happening is irrefutable.
But why refuse to strengthen the NHS during a pandemic?
And is there time for the PM to change this legacy?
Things are a bit hazy just now. We are all reeling from a difficult 20 months. Most are fed-up with Covid-19. And many have realised the damaging secondary impacts of the measures implemented to control it. Popular sentiment bastes in this recent trauma.
Popular sentiment will change. Indeed, for PMs in office during major historical events their legacy takes on a different quality. And I think few will argue the Covid pandemic is the most historical event since WW2. It is certainly killing more civilians.
Read 13 tweets
21 Nov
Johnson's legacy of pursuing a mass infection policy.

One fact will dismantle the Johnson Government’s entire defence at the Covid Inquiry and harm them irreparably at the General Election…

[#JohnsonOut #JohnsonTheCorruptPM #YourNHSNeedsYou]
The PM embarked on ‘freedom day’ without making provision to treat the inevitable increase in severely unwell cases. Just pause for a moment and consider that…
The UK has less inpatient capacity than before the pandemic. Freedom day has led to so much Covid Pneumonia it has TRIPLED the healthcare burden from 'normal' pneumonia - one of the highest burden diseases in the UK - and still the capacity of the NHS is less.
Read 6 tweets
21 Nov
Thanks for all the support raising awareness for the NHS and Covid-19 🙏🏼
I hope you will now permit me to share my academic side with you. I promise it won't be (too) boring.
It tells the story of the pandemic response from a certain perspective. It starts in April 2020..
Early Intervention
Witnessing the 'hands-off' approach being taken by the UK (and US) to patients with Covid-19, we wrote this opinion article to remind our colleagues that we don't need a 'magic bullet' to save lives. Best Supportive Care matters!

rcpjournals.org/content/clinme…
This line became quite useful:
"The battle for lives will likely be won in the community. It is the community doctors, the paramedics and the emergency department staff who will shift the balance and save most lives..."
Read 14 tweets
20 Nov
Prompt treatment of Covid-19 Pneumonia saves lives.

Here, our cross-discipline team reviews some of the signs and symptoms that suggest Covid-19 has progressed to Covid-19 Pneumonia.

Seek help sooner rather than later!

Summary thread
1/7
Share pls.

bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/8/1/e0…
The public should exercise the same judgement for who and when to contact if they are concerned as they did prior to the pandemic. Waiting until severely unwell neither helps patient or health service.
The majority of Covid-19 resolves without event. Typical symptoms are similar to the cold or flu and tend to start improving after two or three days.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(