Since comments were shut down on this thread... a reply thread.

1) The existence of a finite number of things that professionals have been wrong about in their field does not in any way imply the likelihood that a random person is likely to be more correct than professionals.
E.g., if climatologists get some specific detail of climatology wrong in regards to *rapidly evolving news*, that doesn't mean that one should listen to John Doe over the IPCC.

2) When one posits "theoretical harms" of COVID restrictions up against the actual measured harms...
.... the real, demonstrable harms win. I used excess death figures to avoid the "died with COVID vs. died of COVID" red herring. And to be clear: yes, these excess deaths are mainly due to respiratory disease, & to a lesser extent cardiac - the way COVID kills people.
The only cause of death spike apart from COVID is heart disease - but again, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with cardiac conditions, both acute and sequelae - and this was poorly recognized early in the pandemic.
3) Positing problems like "obesity" when US obesity data only goes up to the end of 2019 without evidence is not only meaningless against an actual, demonstrable threat, but illogical. In what world do reduced visits to restaurants and movie theatres increase obesity?
The argument seems to be against "lockdowns", but nobody *wants* lockdowns. Lockdowns are what happen when you *don't do enough to prevent spread* and let it overrun your hospital systems. The way to *prevent* this is vaccines, masks, ventilation, & superspreader event bans.
We've seen this exact same argument applied to all sorts of theoretical harms of policies to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. For example, suicide was supposed to increase. Except in reality, suicide rates actually decreased.

npr.org/2021/11/03/105…
4. You don't just get a choice to "move on". When you do too little, you outstrip hospital capacity, and then death of *all* causes will rise. Every single COVID patient taking up an ICU bed prevents ten major cancer or heart surgeries. You may want to move on. COVID disagrees.
Sometime life throws you fucking lemons. You don't get to wish them into apples.

Does it need to be pointed out that it's not you, young healthy people, who bear the brunt of your choices, but those around you? It doesn't revolve around you. If you're fine with Long COVID and...
post-infection sequelae for yourself, that's one thing, but that doesn't give you the right to harm your neighbors.

researchsquare.com/article/rs-106…

5) To point it out, we don't get to decide whether we have X years of a pandemic. We get to decide how severe they're going to be.
And that comes down to our actions.

* How much of our population do we vaccinate?
* ... and how well?
* What efforts do we need to achieve it?
* How much do we improve ventilation?
* How much do we prevent superspreader events?
* How much do we help suppress spread overseas?
But it also comes down to the virus, which we do not control - beyond suppressing its spread and thus mutation rate.

Again, though: you don't get to ignore a tidal wave. You can run through the streets shouting "fuck the tidal wave, I'm sick of tidal waves". It'll still hit.
6) If you think it's theatrical that you wear a mask to the table then take it off to eat, the part of that you should be questioning is the "sitting in a crowded, poorly ventilated room with no filter for your lungs" part, not the wearing a mask en route part.
7) I'll reiterate that nobody WANTS do to anything. Everyone's goddamn sick of this virus. But some of us are trying to STOP it from getting to the point where hospitals get overrun and there's no choice but lockdowns, while others are doing their best three-monkeys impression.
Have there been stupid actions in the name of prevention? Yes, a ton. But that doesn't mean "don't do non-stupid actions for prevention". Eg: shutting down a factory full of robots: dumb. Tesla implementing a workplace masking policy during a wave when few others were: smart.
And I think messaging has been a problem. Public figures should be open about how we're learning as we go along, rather than jumping from one magic solution / deadline to another. And to be honest about how important *time* is when it comes to solving problems.
One only needs to look to childhood vaccination schedules to see its utility. Time buys us production capacity. It buys us better treatments. It buys us hospital capacity. And so much more.

Time is unfortunately the one resource that nobody wants to give.
So just to stress... this is nothing personal.... I like and really appreciate you. But I had to push back against this thread.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nafnlaus

Nafnlaus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @enn_nafnlaus

26 Nov
To anyone repeating the "B.1.1.529 is due to a lack of vaccine sharing" line: South Africa is not vaccine limited, and hasn't been for months. They've been vaccinating children 12+ for a month. Anyone there can get vaccinated just by showing up. The problem is hesitancy.
A friend of mine from SA messaged me the other night as I was going to sleep, to complain about the mess over there. He has multiple comorbidities, but almost nobody around him is vaccinated. Lots of cases of companies even banning vaccinated people because of "spike shedding".
His company is making everyone (incl. software developers) work at the office. Not for work-related reasons - so they can do extracurricular "bonding activities". A coworker has an adopted child with HIV (immunocompromised & vulnerable) who sought an exemption. Exemption denied.
Read 6 tweets
14 Nov
I was today years old when I learned that all six of the programmers behind ENIAC, the first digital computer, were women (whose work went almost entirely unrecognized until the 1980s).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENIAC

Their first program was nuclear simulations for a hydrogen bomb.
The six - Jean Jennings, Marlyn Wescoff, Ruth Lichterman, Betty Snyder, Frances Bilas, and Kay McNulty - were "human computers" who got their positions due to wartime labour shortages. They kept their jobs after the war because their experience was too difficult to replace.
As generative programming languages did not yet exist, "programming" ENIAC meant switches and rewiring cables, which required a full understanding of its blueprints. Photos of them next to ENIAC referred to them as "refrigerator ladies" & they had to serve as hostesses for guests
Read 14 tweets
1 Nov
@elonmusk @MartinKulldorff @joerogan @DrJBhattacharya Sorry, Elon, but this article is fringe.

1 . "Mounting evidence indicates that natural immunity is stronger and longer lasting than vaccine-induced immunity." - Here's a meta-review of the entire corpus. No, it is not.

cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
@elonmusk @MartinKulldorff @joerogan @DrJBhattacharya 2. "In a study from Israel..."

Hmm, what does the text say at the top of that "Study from Israel", I wonder?
@elonmusk @MartinKulldorff @joerogan @DrJBhattacharya The "study from Israel" is a non-peer-reviewed preprint that not only contradicts the rest of the corpus, but does so by *over an order of magnitude*. Giant flashing red lights with loud sirens should be going off in your head by now.
Read 29 tweets
31 Oct
Good review from the CDC published yesterday of protection levels from past infection vs. vaccination - worth a bookmark.

cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…

Of particular note, the section "Immune Response Kinetics and Duration of Protection" is worth a read.
One criticism about the CDC's stance that jumps immediately to mind is: they show that in most contexts, protection from infection vs. 2-shot vaccination is roughly similar. They then go on to show that it's well evidenced that vaccination following infection significantly...
... further increases protection - justifying their policy they've held since the beginning of offering full course of vaccination for previously infected individuals.

Well, then why did you wait so long to offer the same benefit to people who got their roughly similar level...
Read 8 tweets
5 Sep
@GidMK I've been ranting against cryptocurrency for quite a while, and I fully agree with every word he says.
@GidMK TL/DR: blockchain is a database that can store any data. Nothing more. But it's distributed between many parties, who you can't trust. So unlike a normal database, you have to go to extreme lengths to try to prove that they're not lying to / cheating on you.
@GidMK With cryptocurrencies, they're using it like a database of VISA transactions of digital coins, and also generating a small number with each transaction processed. You could of course do this with any database, but distributed you must assume everyone might be lying.
Read 16 tweets
5 Sep
A slight Sunday decline in UK cases to 37011 corresponds to a slight drop in the doubling time to 37,8d.

In the UK, the decision to suspend all COVID controls in the House of Parliament has been met with a chorus of condemnation from doctors and medical experts, including...
parental consent will be normally required for children to get vaccinated if the government goes through with their plan to overrule the JCVI recommendations, objecting teens deemed "competent" to make choices will be able to overrule their parents.

Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(