I have been in a "chat" with @OptimumHelp for over
an hour and a half about new business internet service. This is the "help" I have gotten. Note the time stamps: ImageImageImageImage
The exciting @OptimumHelp saga continues. No response to my pathetic 12:22 message. ImageImage
Keep in mind THIS IS JUST TO GET ONLINE ACCESS TO FIND OUT IF THEY INSTALLED THE SERVICE
Two hours, @OptimumHelp. In a CHAT. Your rep has ignored me for over 50 minutes. Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ron Coleman

Ron Coleman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RonColeman

26 Nov
I just watched an hour of state-bar mandated Diversity 'n' Things CLE from a very good provider. The panel was intelligent, articulate and sophisticated. And in their work, they are just delivering what the market demands: diversity.

And things.

This made me think, though. >
A large part of the discussion was how law firm clients - big clients, publicly-owned clients, #woke and never, ever broke clients - are using their clout to make law firms more diverse 'n' things.

Of course, Big Corporations and Big Law need each other - and mirror each other.>
So it's not such a big deal.

Big law firms have, after all, long advanced the careers and wealth of lawyers from every race, creed and sexualness based on criteria having at least as much to do with social skills, clubability and pedigree as professional competence. >
Read 13 tweets
24 Nov
"No firm proof"
"Cookies"🍪🍪
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
Special responsibilities of a prosecutor - @ABAEsq americanbar.org/groups/profess…
The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause; . . .

(d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate >
> the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, . . . >
Read 11 tweets
15 Nov
Second opinion 😂
So long #31
Read 4 tweets
15 Nov
The Amendment That Remade America: @tunkuv interviews @RandyEBarnett and @evanbernick wsj.com/articles/fourt… via @WSJopinion
Not your father's Originalism! But: Image
But mainly this: Image
Read 4 tweets
15 Nov
Look at Biden. Look at Harris. Then remember the Democratic presidential primaries.

To those who came in late, a little history.

In 1972 a nice, very liberal man named George McGovern won the Democratic nomination. He lost the election in a landslide. >
He didn't just lose in a landslide. He lost in a landslide to a man Democrats considered the very embodiment of evil - the un-rich but similarly un-clubbable Donald Trump of the middle 20th century: >
The Democrats determined never to let this happen again. So they turned back the clock and "reformed" the primary system so that it became a mere performance to cover up the reality that Democratic nominees would again be chosen in "smoke-filled rooms." >
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(