Libertarianism these days means freedom from taxes, regulations and the law for the rich and powerful, and freedom for fascists, racists and bigots to vent their hate on minorities. Libertarianism is kleptocratic greed allied with fascist hate. Libertarianism is kleptofascism.
The goal of these kleptofascists, who call themselves 'libertarians' is without doubt to destroy democracy and replace it with the rule of the 'Sovereign Individual' as outlined by William Rees-Mogg. It's the rule of the super-rich oligarchs and their paid political minions.
The 1960s unleashed a wave of liberation movements. Libertarianism is a peverse offshoot of those movements, a liberation movement for the rich and powerful, and the fascists, racists and bigots who wail about being the oppressed victims of liberal democracy.
Kleptofascism is an alliance of convience. The oligarchs don't have any special interest in abusing minorities. For them, all non-rich folk are just tools to be abused, as are the nation states so beloved of the nationalist right. But both groups hate liberal democracy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The government has banned civil servants from inviting speakers who have criticised Boris Johnson or his policies.
The Tory elite are kleptofascists who serve only themselves and their super-rich donors. They have no care for democracy or human rights.
The Tories were once a mass-membership party representing the middle class and ordinary British businesses. This pushed it towards supporting democracy. Now the Tory elite serves only itself and its super-rich patrons - neither group have a vested interest in democracy.
Rather than representing voters, the Tory elite has learned to manipulate them with lies, flag-waving and three-word slogans without having any concern for their welfare. The Tory elite does not represent its voters, it uses them.
Priti Patel has quietly been stuffing even more punitive anti-protest powers into the policing bill
Patel is attacking the very basis of our democracy. This is the kind of legislation the Chinese government would want to use in Hong Kong. inews.co.uk/opinion/priti-…
Johnson's 'Fuck business' and shambolic CBI speech are no accident. The Tories no longer represent themselves and ordinary British business. The Tory elite serves only itself and its super-rich often offshore backers. Neither of these groups has any care or need for democracy.
I do not believe the Tory elite is conspiring to destroy democracy. But whenever particular democratic rights, liberties and structures become a nuisance, the Tories will seek to weaken or erase them. Bit by bit, without any plan, they will dismantle democracy.
A Progressive Alliance isn't about parties giving up their identity. It should be about strengthening and reforming democracy, including proportional representation, kicking big money out of politics, media reform and genuine regional government.
A Progressive Alliance could be a 1997 style informal pact. But I think that a formal alliance built around a shared commitment to democratic reform could be presented as a new grown-up style of politics, built around compromise rather than schoolboy yah-boo tribal yelling.
1/ The Tory Brexiters sold Brexit through lies and hate. They colluded in electoral law-breaking, and have attacked the Electoral Commission They attacked the courts over Article 50. They prorogued Parliament and actively avoided investigating Russian interference.
2/ And now these same politicians are enmired in corruption scandals. They're breaking their promises on Brexit and the railways. They're curtailing the right to vote and the right to protest. And they want to curb the courts' power to ensure government obeys the law.
3/ We are ruled, not by a proper democratic government, but by a crooked cabal who serve only themselves and their super-rich paymasters. They are a clique who excel only in corruption, mendacity, greed and incompetence.
The Tories are dumping the eastern arm of HS2 and HS3. So much for levelling up. A once in a lifetime opportunity to provide proper rail links between our great Northern cities and between the Midlands and Yorkshire and the NE has been thrown away.
HS3 wouldn't just reduce Leeds to Liverpool journey times to around 50 minutes and Liverpool-Manchester and Manchester-Leeds times to around 25 minutes. It would carry trains to Hull, Teesside and Newcastle, and finally give Bradford the rail service it deserves.
If routed through an underground station in Manchester also serving other cross-Manchester services, HS3 could transform Manchester from a rail bottleneck into an integrated regional rail hub. Rejecting HS3 is classic short-termist idiocy.
1/ Polling shows 53% support rejoining the EU against 47% who oppose it. 48% think Brexit was wrong vs 39% who think it was right.
Labour wants to stay quiet on Brexit to recapture the red wall. But should non-Labour folk follow Labour and do the same? I say no.
2/ Democracy requires that the views of the anti-Brexit majority are represented. If Labour fails to provide that, then other parties, and political activists have to do that job. It is a travesty of democracy to have over half the population silenced on this issue.
3/ Brexit leaders and many in Labour want to present Brexit as an irresistible political force. That is a lie. In spite of the hostility of most of the political and media establishment Remain gained a majority in the polls in 2017 and has retained it ever since.