There is no “Hindu” caste system. Hindu Vedas don’t refer to a birth-based hierarchy & varna, based on qualities, was never immutable. But calling a discriminatory system with societal/colonial origins “Hindu” nicely targets only Hindus for policing & censure.
The insinuation that casteism pervades South Asian communities is false & the obligatory citation to the @EqualityLabs report is damning. @CarnegieEndow’s scientific survey found caste disc to be a rare occurrence in the US (5% of respondents) & dismissed the EL effort as below:
This Indian graduate student is befuddled when asked if “caste” disc is already covered under existing law. It is!!
Disc based on national origin is already prohibited and discrimination on both national origin and ancestry have been interpreted to cover caste.
Why add caste?
The @Harvard grad student worked with Equality Labs to convince negotiators to add caste. The same EL whose director attacked @Twitter’s new CEO labeling him with the wrong “caste” category! If Equality Labs can’t identify a person’s “caste” how will Harvard administrators?
How would @Harvard define what caste is when there is no scholarly consensus? Ask 100 people what caste is, you get 100 different answers. Will Harvard keep a database of Indian names and add a category for caste? Force Indians to get a “caste certificate?” Wear a patch!?
There will be unintended consequences. @Harvard could jeopardize the well-being, safety, and rights to equal protection and due process for hundreds of Hindu & South Asian students.
Instead of solving a problem, @Harvard creates a new one by unconstitutionally marking a religious & ethnic minority as a suspect class on the basis of its national origin, ethnicity, ancestry, or religion.
We must condemn all forms of disc including caste-based disc. When it happens, report it. But use existing law.
The power of existing law to provide protection against disrimination and mete out justice in its wake is generally applicable and facially neutral. Caste is not.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Salvation Army has deep political ties, but BAPS supposed "ties" to "Hindu" politicians makes print
This is Hinduphobia parading as news
Noteworthy that scholar-activists relentlessly attack Hindus who just worship or speak at BAPS temple events, de facto accusing them of "connections" to unproven allegations. But no academics will similarly insist that we boycott Salvation Army.
But after she shared the latest recycled allegations on an academic listserv, a senior professor told her to knock it off - albeit far more politely than deserved. 1/n
The senior professor said that scholars should:
- be very careful in assessing facts & details in the media
- remember accusations are not proof of wrongdoing
- understand the goals & motivations of every person and organization involved in the issue
2/n
He also asked folks to reserve judgment until more facts were revealed by the appropriate officials and the court.
Wise words, sage advice!
Above all, scholars demonstrating decency, reason, standards, and academic integrity do exist, and at least one spoke up.
3/n
We #HinduAmericans have the unique (mis)fortune to have Indian visitors drop by for a bit and arrogate the immense privilege of platforms such as @TheAtlantic to import their casteist obsessions & counterfactually transfer those anxieties on us. (Thread) theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
You come from a casteist family that dunked on your servants? You want to slam our model minority myth as “flattening”?
Fine.
But your “caste travels” tropes “flatten” varna/jati/etc & expose an entrenched #Hinduphobia & shocking ignorance of Hinduism. Yet you’re platformed.
I mean @TheAtlantic article leads with that Equality Labs survey debunked by the same @CarnegieEndow survey the article also cites! The EL survey excluded the majority of South Asians that identify with no caste & only counted folks like the author identifying as “upper caste” 3/
Reflecting on #dghconference, this was among the most disturbing moments. The same speaker @CeMIS_unigoe who made that repulsive phallus metaphor, put up photos of two men named in the #Cisco case with a casteist slur. They were rendered mute victims of a public spectacle.
Activist-scholars like the one from @CeMIS_unigoe & those in the US pushing for a caste category actually believe that Hindus are so entirely abhorrent that they should be marked a suspicious class and targeted based on their race, national origin, ethnicity, & religion.
It crystallizes for me why we're seeking intervention in the #Cisco case. If caste activists succeeded, companies, states & counties could police one community --Indians & Hindus -- tar them & internationalize names based on allegations alone. This is our formal stance👇
Remember also that because of one of the "manual" author's track record of #Hinduphobia, a conference was actually held on her university's main campus @RutgersU where her Chancellor called #Hinduphobia & anti-Hindu hate out & the concept was fully defined hindustudentscouncil.org/2021/press-rel…
Back to the "manual": it denies #Hinduphobia by denying anti-Hindu bias ever occurs on a "horrific scale." My God.
-Bangladesh Hindu genocide?
-Hindu girls targeted & raped in Pakistan?
-Hindus cleansed from Kashmir?
-generational trauma from temple dest/colonization?
Erased. 3/
The @pewresearch survey of 30,000 Indians has fascinating findings that we will discuss in detail tomorrow evening.
Sharing here a few quick takes showing how Indians see religious tolerance as a central part of who they are as a nation. Tolerance seen as a civic virtue. 1/
Most Hindus in India believe religious diversity benefits the country.
Factoid: BJP supporters were most likely to champion religious diversity (two-thirds). 2/
How about a surprise?
India's Hindus and Muslims believe equally in the concept of Karma! Hindus & Muslims believe in Karma even more than all other Dharma religious traditions. 3/