1 "One case that always impressed me is vouched for by my friend Lois Bourne in her book, Witch Among Us. Lois is a ‘witch’ in the sense of possessing odd psychic powers, of whose reality I have not the slightest doubt. She is an extremely sensible and down-to-earth lady and, in
2 "her book, among many stories that psychical researchers will find credible enough, she tells a story that will obviously cause most readers to doubt her truthfulness. Staying on holiday at a cottage at Crantock, in Cornwall, she met another member
3 "of a Wiccan coven, and spent an evening at her home. The woman’s husband, Rob, asked her if she would like to see a goblin. One appeared, he said, among the rushes of the millstream at Treago Mill every morning at sunrise, and if she wanted to see him, she had to be up early.
4 "The next morning Lois and her husband Wilfred joined Rob at the mill gate, and they crept up to the stream. ‘I have never been able to decide, and still cannot decide, whether I really saw that goblin, or if Rob made me see it. Whatever it was, there,
5 "sitting on a stone calmly washing his socks, was an elfin creature with a red hat, green coat and trews, one yellow sock on, and one in his tiny hands in the process of being washed. I remember thinking at the time in my sleepy befuddled but practical way 'what an atrocious
6 "'colour combination'. Suddenly he saw us and he disappeared … 'Now do you believe me?' asked Rob.’ I have known Lois for years. I may be gullible and she may be a liar, but I believe her. She is not the type to invent such a silly story. And neither
7 "is her husband Wilfred – who also saw it – the type to support a downright lie.
"In short, I firmly believe that the world is full of living beings that are invisible to us, and the poltergeist is only one among many.
"Why is this book about Contagion? Because one of its
8 "basic arguments is that poltergeists are not ‘one-offs’, as researchers (including myself) used to assume, but seem to be capable of spreading like an infection – a startling idea new to poltergeist lore."
~Colin Wilson
Cornwall, May 2009
9 That's the foreword to a book I just bought, "Poltergeist Parallels and Contagion."
Elves? Goblins? I haven't spent time on that kind of thing but anybody who has read "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon" will recognize why the last part of that quote is important. #contagion
10 Same book but a more recent foreword:
"Darren’s book presents intriguing evidence of ‘contagion’, a process whereby poltergeist phenomena can spread out from the home of the principal witnesses and affect others, such as members of their extended family, or investigators.
11 "However, although people affected by contagion will probably find their experiences perplexing and frightening, it seems that the activity becomes diluted as it spreads (Stories in "Skinwalker" dispute that). Darren and Michael speculated that contagion could be
12 "either ‘active’ or ‘passive’. With the former, someone who is connected with the afflicted person or family would be deliberately targeted by the intelligence behind the phenomena. In passive contagion, however, the process would occur
13 "automatically, like accidentally catching a cold from a friend."
After reading Skinwalkers & listening 2 various interviews, seems Lacatski may have been targeted (active) but daughter of biotechnologist in Bend, Oregon was just in the wrong place @ the wrong time (passive).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 Kitty, as I was driving home yesterday, I was thinking the same thing: I love the written word & that's why I started the transcripts. I've always felt they were important. But I've also let it be known I wanted to do this FT bc to cover these subjects properly, & to do it
2 right, it takes a lot of time. Especially transcripts. So for me to do that, it meant taking less of my regular TV work. A lot less. And while I appreciate the support I've received (Patreon, Pay Pal & such), it's actually gone down a lot the past month & a half. I think I had
3 one new Patron during that time. So, obviously, most folks don't see the value in what I do. Especially my Twitter feed, which I spend a lot of time on. Such is life. People would rather see YT interviews. I do, too that but I also have the blog (with 4 new transcripts recently
Putting finishing touches (chapters) on my interview with @g_knapp & Colm Kelleher from a few weeks ago. It will be up late tonight and I'll have multiple transcripts (related to "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon") on my blog to go along with it.
@g_knapp Kelleher touched on the Project Hessdalen engineers and paranormal effects they experienced at home. I certainly had never heard that before.
1 #ufotwitter - @Travis_Tritten (TT): "I wanted to ask you about this new #UAP office that was created by @DepSecDef - Hicks and announced last week. The Aerial Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group."
2 TT: "It's a mouthful. Was there any coordination with lawmakers on Capitol Hill that are proposing related legislation like @RepRubenGallego & @gillibrandny? And secondly, some former Pentagon officials who had worked on this issue, @ChrisKMellon & @LueElizondo, have said that
3 TT: "this is an effort for the Pentagon to be less transparent...
JK: "Hmm."
TT: "...on UAPs. And I was just wondering if u had any response?"
JK: "On the first one, I can't speak to pending legislation, obviously, I'd refer to those members. But we absolutely kept members
This is the only article on astrology that I've ever read bc I've always thought it was bullshit. But this one made me think twice. It was written by @BigelowInst award-winner, Stephen Braude, who usually focuses on life after death and parapsychology.
2 "I married a remarkable woman who, in addition to being exceptionally well educated and intelligent, with impeccable credentials in both clinical and experimental psychology as well as psychometric research, was also an apparently gifted astrologer, capable of making reliable,
3 "detailed, and accurate predictions. I needed to understand what was going on, and I needed to probe her claim that she was doing something quite different from what the vast majority of so-called astrologers were doing."
1/2 @ODNIgov Avril Haines, “Extraterrestrially”and @julianbarnes@nytimes editing the original article. Note: I’m not suggesting anything nefarious here.
2/2 @ODNIgov Avril Haines, “Extraterrestrially”and @julianbarnes@nytimes editing the original article. Note: I’m not suggesting anything nefarious here.
3 Yes, articles get updated all the time & info. added. That's why my focus was on Barnes saying Haines was not necessarily referring to space aliens but rather meteors & solar flares. Nobody believes that except maybe 4 Barnes. Let's see if he can clarify where he got that from.
1 Yes, & I agree w/@SnakePo9 & think it's possible. @inf3rence was leading the discussion on this & I'm just seeing it now. Talk 2 some who worked in the world of defense/intel their entire lives & they MAY see it differently than how I do here. I've encountered opposition. #ufo
2 For this convo, let's assume that we have an intact, minimally operational, non-human craft & the cadavers of multiple non-humans. It's all in two USAPs w/no oversight except the handful of folks with knowledge of said programs. Releasing the information on the bodies is a
3 no-brainer 2 me as the world deserves 2 know this. So, f**k any nat sec argument on that. Of course, there WILL be folks who say we need 2 study the bodies 2 see if we can exploit any of their biological uniqueness & try to transfer it 2 benefit our soldiers on the battelfield.