Steve Bannon has gotten himself sent to prison.

Mark Meadows turned over evidence and has still gotten himself sent to prison.

Multiple people are pleading the fifth.

Mike Pence's chief of staff is fully cooperating.

So are others.

The 1/6 committee's strategy is working.
This is what winning in politics looks like. Every single Trump person has to decide whether to sell Trump out or go to prison. Plenty will sell Trump out. Plenty will go to prison. In every instance it's a win for America and a loss for Trump world.
In politics or any other arena, it's almost impossible to set things up so expertly that your opponents lose no matter what move they make. Yet the 1/6 committee has done precisely this. Of course it helped that Trump world did all this dumb criminal stuff to begin with.
What we're starting to see now is that the committee is way ahead of where things appear from the outside at any given time.

They've had White House metadata all along.

Pence's chief of staff has been cooperating for weeks. We all just learned about today.

And so on.
The key to all of this is to be a step ahead of the witnesses.

Let them partially cooperate, get some evidence from them, hit them for contempt anyway (Meadows).

Let them lie, then reveal you have proof that they lied, push them to flip by threatening perjury charges.
No witness who's in the thick of culpability just waltzes in and immediately decides to cooperate with bells on, just for kicks.

You have to back hostile witnesses into corners, pit them against each other, and so on.

And they gradually screw up until some of them have to cave.
You also have to pick up on things like the fact that while Pence doesn't want to cooperate against Trump, some of Pence's people are apparently more than happy to, because they've surely hated Trump all along anyway. Which the committee did figure out, and got Pence's #1 guy.
Just how did the 1/6 committee get the Trump White House metadata from Clark's letter? Either someone from the Trump White House, or a Georgia official, has provided these electronic records. Either way, it's a huge win. This is how these probes succeed.
There's still a lot we don't know about what the 1/6 committee has and what it'll do with it. But from what we can see thus far, the committee appears to be overwhelmingly succeeding. There's zero evidence that the committee is somehow blowing it.
Once you realize that 1) these things succeed when they're done strategically not frantically, 2) there are no instant magic wands the committee could be waving instead, and 3) our democracy will not be dead by this time tomorrow, you can see that the committee is nailing it.
But you have to view the committee, the probe, and the incremental caving/imploding of witnesses from a factually realistic point of view. No falling for pundits who insist the committee should be using this or that magic wand idea. No doomsday hysteria about how we're all dead.
And once you realize that media outlets and pundits have a hard time coming off as relevant if they simply admit that the committee appears to be getting everything right, you realize why they have to invent so much doomsday stuff just to have a reason to be running their mouths.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

9 Dec
The doomsday pundits are basing all their scary predictions on the premise that the 1/6 committee members are all complete morons who:

1) can't read a calendar

2) forgot to interview friendly witnesses before moving on to hostile ones

3) don't know when the midterms are
Once you realize the 1/6 committee members aren't morons, did amass evidence from friendly witnesses, control the pace of their own probe, and will make criminal referrals that will carry over no matter how the midterms go, you realize these doomsday pundits are pushing FICTION.
Ask yourself: is committee member Adam Schiff a complete moron who can't read a calendar and doesn't understand how to handle witnesses? Or is he a savvy politician who knows when the midterms are, and a former prosecutor who knows exactly how probes work? You know the answer.
Read 11 tweets
9 Dec
Turns out the 1/6 Committee has Mark Meadows’ text messages, the Trump regime’s election overthrow PowerPoint presentation, and Trump White House metadata on Jeffrey Clark’s letter. It’s becoming clear that the committee has amassed ton of incriminating 1/6 evidence.
For those who have been asking what the committee has been doing all this time, this answers the question. It’s been amassing all this evidence from cooperating witnesses, so it can use it to pressure and/or bust hostile witnesses. It’s simply how these kinds of probes work.
Also, if the 1/6 committee has this evidence, then so does the DOJ. Keep in mind that the DOJ is going to tell you even less about its criminal probe, while it’s still in progress, than the committee is going to tell you about its fact finding probe.
Read 6 tweets
9 Dec
Whenever I’m proven to be particularly correct about something, and the mainstream media and/or doomsday pundits are proven to be particularly full of it, they retaliate by sabotaging my reputation. But their willingness to spread lies about me just proves how dishonest they are.
If I were willing to just regurgitate the same ratings-driven bullshit that they’re all pushing on any given day, I’d have a perfectly clean reputation, and I’d have ten times as many followers.

All you have to do to succeed in this industry is to not care about the truth.
I’ve been doing this for years, encountered just about everyone in this industry at some point, and I can sadly count on one hand the number of political journalists and pundits I’d consider honest and trustworthy. This is, simply put, a garbage industry.
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec
Why is the House referring Mark Meadows for contempt next week instead of right this second? Because it DOESN'T MATTER. Meadows is done. He's on a path to prison now. No longer relevant. The committee is moving forward with the evidence he provided against others in Trump world.
"But unless they ring him up RIGHT THIS MINUTE..."

NO. It makes no difference. Even once the referral happens, it'll take the DOJ weeks to indict him, and his trial will take months – just like every other criminal prosecution in America. There's no magically speeding it up.
The point of indicting Meadows for contempt is to make other witnesses understand that the same thing will happen to them unless they cooperate. The timetable for the formalities against Meadows, it doesn't matter. Other witnesses can all clearly see his life is being shattered.
Read 8 tweets
9 Dec
The real news of the day:

- Committee let Mark Meadows know it had him nailed

- He turned over incriminating evidence against the Trump White House to try to save himself, before backing out

- Meadows’ suit is a distraction to keep Trump from noticing that he’s sold him out
So why did Meadows back out? Did Trump threaten him with even uglier criminal dirt than what the committee has on him? Is Meadows just that wishy washy?

Either way, the damage to Trump world is done. Meadows can’t just magically take the evidence back from the committee.
Meadows clearly expects to be prosecuted for underlying election-related crimes, or he wouldn’t have even briefly flipped on others.

Trouble for him is he’d have to cut a deal with the committee, DOJ, the DA in Georgia, all of them.

Now he’ll also be prosecuted for contempt.
Read 6 tweets
8 Dec
If the 1/6 committee tossed Bannon and Meadows in the Capitol jail cell, a federal judge would free them by the end of the day, and then the committee would have zero leverage against anyone going forward. The pundits calling for this are either clueless or full of shit.
As always, the pundits are merely trying to position themselves as being smarter and more aggressive than Democratic leaders, whom they (inaccurately) paint as hapless cowards. It’s what they base their brand on. It doesn’t matter that these pundits’ “clever” ideas are laughable.
The pundits know full well that the point of busting Bannon and Meadows is to scare other more skittish witnesses into cooperating, which is working. But if the pundits admit that, then they have nothing to bash the 1/6 committee for, and no way to paint themselves as clever.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(