In coming to India, the @DalaiLama trod the path of many #Tibetans before him-- traders+ aristocrats, monastics+ laity, and his predecessor, the 13th #DalaiLama, Thupten Gyatso, who had lived in exile in British India from 1910-12.
--SC
3/ Aristocratic families in #Tibet were closely tied in networks of monastic patronage, intermarriage +trade w/ eastern #Himalayan kingdoms of #Bhutan+ #Sikkim. The British Political Officer in Sikkim kept close watch on these alliances. Here he is w/ the 13th #DalaiLama👇.
--SC
4/ Facilitated by the Political Officer, children from these families studied in British schools+ colleges in colonial capitals of Simla+ Calcutta in India, +at universities in England.
See letter👇 from @IN_Archives for the density of interconnections w/in the #Himalaya.
--SC
5/ In fact, Tibetans cud enter British India w/o passport, visa, or any entry permit-- "which is more than the Chinese or French, or I myself get,” said the last Brit Political Officer in Sikkim (8 May 1947).
The same was true for Indians traveling to Tibet.
--SC #TweetHistorians
6/ The colonial state tolerated some ambiguity re: borders. Borderlanders often had multiple+ overlapping political loyalties. Independent India inherited this cartographic uncertainty and territorial anxiety.
See, @GuyotRechard, @DavidGellner, @NMenonRao, @kylejgardner.
--SC
7/ Following Independence (1947), India remained sensitive to relative porosity of its border w/ Tibet +customary nature of movement across it. Tibetans were coming in increasing nos. in the wake of political changes in Tibet, including @DalaiLama's brother #GyaloThondup.
--SC
8/ A day before @DalaiLama reached India on 31 March 1959, Indian Prime Minister #Nehru told Parliament that it was customary for #Himalayan#Buddhist monks India to go to #Tibet for religious instruction w/o permits:
“They simply come and go, and do not report to us.”
--SC
9/ @DalaiLama himself had met Nehru twice before 1959: in Peking (1954)+ for the #Buddha's 2500th birth anniversary celebrations in India (1956). On the second visit, he expressed a desire to stay in India and was (may be) given a saffron-colored car:
10/ Thus, @DalaiLama and the #Tibetans who followed him were far from blazing a trail when they came to India, the birthplace of Buddhism+ an old friend to #Tibet. The sentiment is poignantly captured in Tibetan exile activist-poet Lhasang Tsering's "Thank You India."
-- SC
11/ For more on @DalaiLama's escape to India, see:
--@DalaiLama's autobiography "Freedom in Exile"
Hi all, @mediaevalrevolt here, putting up my last #Tweethistorian thread today, this one on how the #Jacquerie ended and how people remembered (and forgot) it afterward. - jfb
When the cities abandoned the Jacques, the nobles' vengeance took free rein. They burned whole villages and slaughtered the innocent along with the guilty. Widows search for the bodies of their husbands to give them proper burial - jfb
Villagers fought back, though, and what started as a social uprising in May turned into a social war in June and July. - jfb
Welcome to #Tweethistorian 🧵4 by @mediaevalrevolt on the #Jacquerie. I am making Thanksgiving dinner (in Scotland 🏴) today and it's going to look exactly like this:
In the meantime, let me tell you about who actually joined the #Jacquerie and how they did and did not get along. Here I'm drawing from my article in Speculum last year and ch. 7 of my book. - jfb journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.108…
First up, men and women: All but 11 of the ca. 500 rebels we know by name were male, but this doesn't mean that women didn't participate or weren't important to the revolt. - jfb
Welcome to 🧵3 in this week’s #Jacquerie posts by @mediaevalrevolt . Today I'll talk rebel organization
Medieval revolts often look like undirected mob fury, but most, including the Jacquerie, had formal leadership directing the action - jfb
In the #Jacquerie many villages chose local captains to lead them. Local captains reported to a 'General Captain of the Countryside' named Guillaume Calle. The locations of some of these captains and their movements are shown in blue here. - jfb
Calle had a number of close associates - his 'top brass' - who rode with him and who carried his messages and decisions to local contingents (though they did not always do what he said - more on that anon) -jfb
In the previous thread we looked at premodern human rights discourse in Islamic intellectual history. In this final thread we will look at the relationship between Islam and modern human rights discourse.
So let us begin where the genesis of our question lies, at the birth of modern human rights themselves. After WWII the United Nations formed out of the League of Nations to represent the new world emerging out of the ashes of colonialism and world wars.
~aym
Out of these same ashes several forces, including religious forces such as the Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain (d.1973), used
the post-war momentum to bind the new order to the highest ethical standards that went beyond the earlier international treaties.
The focus of this thread is this question: Are human rights a modern invention? This depends on your definition of human rights. If you believe human rights are exactly like we’ve them today in international law, then yes, that is modern. You can’t project those on the past.
~aym
To compare modern human rights law to Islam is to compare two things that developed in separate contexts, even though Muslim countries were deeply involved in developing modern international human rights law. This comparison is therefore about Islam *and* human rights.
~aym
But as we’ll see, ethical religions like Islam also developed over the centuries their own concepts of human rights. Both as a moral and legal concept, and already in medieval times. And it is of course this aspect of Islam we should compare to modern human rights discourse.
~aym
In a series of threads I’ll focus on another combination of Islamic studies and philosophy of religion: Islam and human rights.
This topic is mainly approached from the pov of legal studies whereby both Islam and human rights are approached as contemporary positive law.
~aym
But as I argue in my JIE article, only one part of Islam overlaps with what we would call positive law, while the rest would fall under legal theory and ethics.
Apart from the false reduction of Islam to law, there is also the issue of the historicity of human rights discourse. Are human rights a modern invention? Have we become more humane over the centuries? Were some ethical concepts unknowable in the centuries before?