Large study on boosters in Israel

Summary

>60 age

Risk of death among those who got infected: No difference between 2 or 3 dose groups

Risk of picking up an infection was 12 times lower after booster

Note: this was not a randomised trial

1/10

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… Image
The study compared the outcomes among 7,58,118 people who got booster with 85,090 who did not.

We do not know if there was a baseline difference in COVID- appropriate behaviour between the 2 groups.

Assuming no such difference, infection risk is reduced 12 fold by booster.

2/
A few calculations based on the table:

Age > 60, non boosted (2 dose)

Infection rate 62 per 100,000 person days
Death rate 2.3
Ratio = 1 : 27

Age >60 (boosted)
Infection rate 5.1 per 100,000 person days
Death rate 0.2
Ratio = 1 : 26

(Ratio = chance of death if infected)

3/ Image
Unfortunately they did not report on unvaccinated people for comparison. At the beginning of the study (Aug 6) about 37% of the population was unvaccinated.

This could have served as a control group to see how the 2-dose group was actually doing. (Should not be difficult)

4/ Image
Observations from non-randomised studies are subject to multiple forms of bias which include differences baseline differences in Covid appropriate behaviour, testing threshold and demography, not all of which can be statistically corrected for.

5/
The study was conducted during the most recent COVID surge in Israel, the starting date being August 6 and ending date September 29. 59% of the population had been fully vaccinated at the beginning of the study. 37% had been and vaccinated, but not included in the study.

6/
Apparently, the 3rd dose does not make the person ANY LESS LIKELY TO DIE in the event of an infection

This suggests that in the two-tiered immunity (1. infection 2. organ damage), the 2nd tier is “already maxed out” after 2nd dose, while the 1st tier (NAb) can be ‘topped up’

7/
What can be inferred from the study therefore is that a booster dose will provide a new window of protection from picking up infections.

What the body’s immune system does AFTER the infection sets in, appears to be already decided by the initial 2 dose series of vaccine.

8/
What the booster dose apparently does, is to reduce the odds of picking up an infection (assuming no difference in CAB between groups) and its expected natural outcomes.

Fewer infections = fewer deaths.

9/
It will be appropriate to add that non pharma interventions are also effective at reducing infections.

Adherence to these will effectively reduce not only the total number of infections, but also the number of severe outcomes.

10/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rajeev Jayadevan

Rajeev Jayadevan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RajeevJayadevan

11 Dec
Long lived T memory cells one year after COVID-19.

Authors studied CD8 memory cells that persisted after the initial effector response, followed by contraction.

They noted phenotypical differences between memory cells in mild & severe COVID-19.

1/12

nature.com/articles/s4158…
Authors believe that factors such as antigen availability, type of antigen-presenting cells, and cytokine milieu – might influence the type of memory formed.

Note: T cell memory cells are of multiple categories, not all of which are detected in peripheral blood.

2/
Some memory cells live in tissue and others in lymph nodes.

This study looked only at peripheral blood, and hence is not a description of T rm or T cm memory cells.

T rm’s live in tissues and do not move out. They defend tissues (e.g. lungs & mucosa) when an attack occurs.

3/
Read 16 tweets
10 Dec
“Immortal Time Bias” produces exaggerated positive results in observational studies. Thanks @DrToddLee for pointing it out

e.g. Booster studies give reliable results when subjects are randomised to booster or placebo. RCT ensures ~equal comparison.

1/9

academic.oup.com/aje/article/16…
What is immortal time bias?

When a group under observation has a fixed advantage at the outset.

In heart transplantation VS non heart transplantation studies, this bias was first described (those who got the transplant had the opportunity to survive till they got operated)

2/
That is, the transplanted group were the healthier of the lot, they survived longer than those who died while waiting for surgery.

This was projected as an apparent outcome of transplant in some studies.

3/
Read 9 tweets
9 Dec
No waning of immunity against severe disease: New York data NEJM

Note the effectiveness is calculated by comparing with unvaccinated group, which is gradually acquiring immunity from natural infection. Hence, there will be a decrease in the difference as time moves forward.

1/n ImageImage
There is a marked difference in hospitalisation rates among vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated.

I have calculated some numbers for three age groups👇

🔹For >65

Unvax Risk of Hospitalisation 1:87 (1:1000 for vax)
Difference is 12 times

See below 👇
🔹For 50-64

Unvax Risk of Hospitalisation 1:186 (1:3636 for vax)
Difference is 20 times

🔹For 18-49

Unvax Risk of Hospitalisation 1:453 (1:9899 for vax)
Difference is 22 times

All calculations based on Pfizer (see table below for others) Image
Read 4 tweets
9 Dec
Immunology simplified

A map of our immune response to viral infection shared by @papaphone2002

I have added (in red) the role of the much-discussed neutralising antibody, thread👇

Our immunity team has so many more players, who cannot be fooled by the virus.

Here’s why

1/5
Please note the diagram only presents an outline, not the whole thing.

Neutralising antibodies form only a tiny fraction of our TOTAL antibody response. Most antibodies are produced AFTER the attack occurs, helping eliminate virus.

(Labs measure Ab’s ALREADY in circulation)

2/
In other words, neutralising antibodies aren’t everything.

And, importantly, a “loss of neutralisation” (‼️🔴alarmist language that lab researchers love to use while describing their work to a clueless public) doesn’t mean “we have lost against the virus”.

3/
Read 15 tweets
8 Dec
Tuesday COVID meeting updates this week (been holding these ever since the onset of the pandemic)

#1

In a series of 70 consecutive COVID deaths reported at a large Kerala hospital, 69 were unvaccinated, one had received 1 dose vaccine.

That was 98.6% unvaccinated, May-Sept

1/
This data is powerful evidence that vaccination has made a significant reduction in the severe outcomes of delta.

Remember, these are vaccines based on the old Wuhan strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Yet they are protective against delta variant.

This is hard evidence.

2/
This is real-world evidence that vaccine protection (against severe disease, mainly cell mediated immunity) kicks in with the first dose itself.

In fact we know from lab studies that T cells arrive by day 10 after the first dose.

Let me explain the immunology.

3/
Read 9 tweets
8 Dec
Discussed a few aspects of vaccination among children in India with @snehamordani @IndiaToday
Link to 24 minute video of the panel discussion 👇

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(