So here are the Questions and Answers from the EU Commission about their Guidelines on collective bargaining of self-employed people ec.europa.eu/commission/pre… A short THREAD
The Guidelines cover “only solo self-employed persons, namely, service providers who do not have any employees and who rely primarily on their own personal labour for the provision of the services.” 👇🏼
This notion corresponds to the personal work approach to competition law and collective bargaining advanced by @N_Countouris, myself and other colleagues (based on a longstanding idea of Mark Freedland and Nicola) HOWEVER… socialeurope.eu/collective-bar…
The Guidelines fall short of covering all the self-employed workers addressed under our proposals. The Commission specifies that they cover only: 1) the “economically dependent solo self-employed persons”, ie those who earn 50% or more of their income from a single principal👇🏼
2) “solo self-employed working “side-by-side” with workers” namely those solo self-employed who provide the same or similar tasks “side-by-side” with workers working for the same counterparty.
3) self-employed workers who work for digital labour platforms as defined by the Platform Work Directive presented today, and therefore as defined in the provision in this pic as “persons performing platform work”
These Guidelines, make no mistake, are a step forward compared to the existing situation where most vulnerable self-employed, including those working with platforms, were on too shaky grounds vis-à-vis competition law when trying to bargain collectively
It is also positive that the Guidelines do not only apply to platform workers as self-employed workers in need of the protection of collective bargaining are present in all the sectors and industries not only in platform work.
Nonetheless, the categories under 1) and 2) may be of difficult identification (income thresholds are proved difficult to apply and “working side-by-side” with workers can be too easily circumvented). In short, many self-employed persons in need of collective bargaining…👇🏼
… may still be arbitrarily excluded from protection. E.g. domestic workers who often are misclassified as self-employed, don’t work side by side with other workers, and often don’t receive 50% of their income from a single household are excluded if they don’t work for a platform
And this is only an example - many artists, voice-over actors, freelance journalists may be excluded from these criteria. The Guidelines, therefore, are still not entirely sufficient to provide collective bargaining protection to all workers who need it…
+++ BREAKING: The draft Platform Work Directive has made into the press +++ This text seems poised to make a huge difference in how platform work is regulated. A brief explanatory THREAD here and a more expanded comment with @_aloisi coming soon. 👇🏼 politico.eu/article/eu-gig…
The Directive has a broad definition of digital labour platform. It applies to all forms of offline platform work both offline (food-delivery; domestic work; transportation) and online work (crowdworking). It is not sector specific like the Spanish Ley Rider.
The Directive reaffirms the “primacy of facts” principle of substance prevailing over forms. Even if the parties described their relationship as one of self-employment this can be challenged and reclassified if the reality of the work does not correspond to an independent status
Gli ultimi dati sull’occupazione e sulla mancata crescita dell’occupazione femminile segnalano un fenomeno preoccupante che va affrontato con molta più attenzione. Bisogna anche evitare di identificare cause in maniera semplicistica. 1/
Alcuni commentatori, ad es. @francescocosta nel suo podcast di ieri, hanno messo in correlazione questi dati con il blocco dei licenziamenti e la cassa integrazione, che avrebbero portato a scaricare tutto il peso della crisi sui lavoratori temporanei. 2/
E siccome donne e giovani hanno più probabilità di avere questi contratti allora risentirebbero di queste politiche. Non sembra plausibile, però, legare questi fenomeni al blocco dei licenziamenti che è stata una misura quasi esclusivamente italiana e non adottata altrove 3/
+++ BREAKING on platform work in Italy +++ A tribunal in Bologna ruled that Deliveroo’s application of the collective agreement signed between Assodelivery and a right-wind minority union in Italy that classified riders as self-employed and imposed piece-rate payments is unlawful
This collective agreement is controversial as it derogates from the law unfavorably for workers and because the trade union signing it is allegedly not representative enough to deregulate statutory protection for workers that are “hetero-organized” google.it/amp/s/www.poli…
“Hetero-organized” workers are self-employed persons who work personally and whose work is organized by the other party, such as riders. These workers get all the employment and labour protection of employees unless a representative collective agreement provide otherwise 👇🏼
Qualche ulteriore riflessione visto che l’articolo non è in chiaro occhiello e titolo possono fuorviare. Non penso affatto che il datore di lavoro possa sanzionare disciplinarmente il lavoratore che non si vaccina e licenziarlo per questo. Non spetta al datore di lavoro THREAD 👇🏼
Non spetta al datore di lavoro imporre l’obbligo di vaccinarsi. Per quello ci vuole una legge apposita, se il legislatore vuole; non bastano ordini emessi da privati e nemmeno contratti tra le parti sociali. Un trattamento sanitario obblig. va previsto specificatamente da legge👇🏼
Il lavoratore subordinato non è un suddito cui il datore può imporre obblighi sanitari così pressanti senza che una specifica legge lo autorizzi. Detto questo, non esiste un diritto a mettere in pericolo gli altri: se un lavoratore che non si vaccina non può essere adibito... 👇🏼
A common misconception is that ILO Standards only apply to people in a employment relationship since this was the common lynchpin for labour rights during the 20th century in most industrialized countries, and the ILO is mistakenly assumed to follow suit
Instead, if we look at the travaux préparatoires of the Standards we often find that constituents frequently intended them to cover workers beyond the standard employment relationship. This is often confirmed by the works of the ILO Supervisory Bodies. A prominent example are 👇🏼
BREAKING FROM ITALY ON PLATFORM WORK. The office of the public prosecutor in Milan together with specialized law enforcement issued sanctions towards the biggest delivery platform amounting to up to 733 MILLION EURO (not a typo!), according to @repubblicagoogle.com/amp/s/milano.r…
These sanctions are linked, according to them, to alleged violations of health and safety regulations. The investigation was prompted by occupational accidents some riders suffered in the past months
The prosecutor ordered these platforms to hire up to 60,000 riders as employees. According to the investigation, the platforms allegedly engage in illegal gangmastering enabled by artificial intelligence and algorithmic management.