The original CBO score of BBB which showed a deficit-impact that rounds to zero over ten years (and if extended would show deficit reduction over twenty years) is a more reliable guide to the likely fiscal impact of BBB than the hypothetical score they just released. A 🧵.
The programs in BBB include expirations, some of them very soon after the programs launch. It will be up to Congress how to handle these. Four possibilities:

1. Programs expire.
2. Extensions are paid for.
3. Extensions are not paid for.
4. Extensions traded for GOP extensions.
Under scenarios 1 and 2 the law would be roughly budget neutral over the next ten years and would be deficit reducing in present value. I place the greatest probability on those--is what the President says and Manchin/GOP will likely have veto power in the future.
If you integrate across the probability of all four outcomes then you get something more like deficit neutrality over the longer run.

BUT in many ways that collapses the next budget debate back into this one. The deficit increasing will come from the next law not this one.
Moreover, there are offsets to extend some of these programs. The top individual rate could easily rise to 39.6% and the corporate rate to 25-28%. Almost all of the Democratic Party would support these offsets in the future.
I'm more worried that preschool will go away than I am that the deficit will be increased. I say this for two reasons: (1) the probability of preschool going away is higher than it is deficit financed and (2) unlike POTUS/Manchin, I would rather have a deficit than no preschool.
Finally, the future fiscal trajectory will to some albeit imperfect degree a function of the future economic/fiscal situation. If interest rates are high and deficits are escalating that would make it even harder to extend everything.
Many things I wish were different re BBB: larger gross size, more tax increases, everything permanent, some deficit financing. But all a fight for another day. If you want to evaluate the fiscal impact of what Congress is passing you should look at CBO's score of the actual bill.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Furman

Jason Furman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jasonfurman

10 Dec
A little more on the US-Europe comparison. Key points:

1. Output trajectory *appears* to be the same for both (with some possibility the US is ahead).

2. Inflation is much higher in the US.

3. Fiscal support likely considerably larger in US.

A 🧵.
OUTPUT. The Euro area was well behind the United States but seems to have mostly caught up as vaccinations, caseloads, and social distancing rules came closer.
3 ways to compare economic recoveries: relative to the OECD's pre-pandemic forecast, relative to pre-pandemic trends and relative to pre-pandemic levels. (The last overly favors the United States because we should have had more growth due to more favorable demography.)
Read 21 tweets
10 Dec
3 weeks ago I called on the Fed to pivot. Since then the data has mostly (but not entirely) strengthened my argument and the Fed is beginning to pivot.

My case relied on any *one* of these three:

1. Getting closer to max employment
2. Inflation above target
3. Policy loosening
1. The last jobs report was mixed w/ a mediocre headline number & a very strong household number (a large drop in unemployment and a rise in participation). UI claims have been plummeting and are the lowest ever (as a share of the workforce). piie.com/blogs/realtime…
On balance I think most people that follow the labor market thought the November report was strong. I don't think we're at full employment but 4.2% is a lot closer than we were. And so expansionary policy is still warranted it just doesn't need to be as/increasingly expansionary.
Read 10 tweets
10 Dec
CPI up 0.8% in November, 6.8% for the last 12 months. A lot of that was volatile energy which is coming down.

Core up 0.5%, or 4.9% for the last 12 months.

Stripping out some volatile pandemic items from core the underlying still quite high and broadly trending up.
Some items were unusually large in Nov & likely will be fall in the future (eg gasoline +6.1% & used cars at +2.5%).

But some items go the other way (rent/OER was 0.4% & that pace will almost certainly pick up, hospitals were -0.3% and transpo was 0.7% with more room to grow.)
One source of upward price pressure in November appears to have been the easing of the delta variant. The virus likely (but not definitely) reduced inflation in Aug/Sep/Oct. Pandemic services now rising again--but still have a ways to go.
Read 13 tweets
8 Dec
Part of the reason people might be upset is that this is not true. Real wages are down ~1% since the pandemic.

Your data suffer from composition bias: about 5m generally lower-wage workers are no longer employed and not having them in the data spuriously raises wages.
Moreover, the important issue is not are real wages up but by how much. They rose ~1% annually pre-COVID. They're now 2.5%-3% below where they "should" have been. See my piece with with Willie Powell that tells the broad story.
piie.com/blogs/realtime…
There are important distributional issues: real wages do appear to be up for lower wage workers, although not quite as quickly as they were rising pre-COVID.

The rest of this thread is a technical appendix--I don't recommend anyone read it. Image
Read 7 tweets
3 Dec
Willie Powell & my blog on today's (confusing) jobs numbers. We put the last year in context. Contrary to widespread belief, job growth has been near expectations--as surprisingly strong labor demand offsets surprisingly weak labor supply. A 🧵 piie.com/blogs/realtime…
To understand what was expected we use the median forecast from the Survey of Professional Forecasters. Other forecasts were similar. Overall, has slightly outpaced. Here is avg monthly jobs for 2021:

Nov 2020 forecast: 432K/month
May 2021 forecast: 562K/month
Actual: 555K/month Image
Similar story for unemployment. Back in May (the first forecast that incorporated the American Rescue Plan) the SPF expected the UR to be about 4.9% in Nov, instead it was 4.2%.

(Note, they don’t forecast labor force participation but likely would be worse than expected.)
Read 10 tweets
24 Nov
I'm not writing any more economic threads until after Thanksgiving. I hope you're not reading any until after Thanksgiving either. But in case you're weird enough to want to use the break to catch up here is a thread of some recent threads. Enjoy--or even better don't!
I put my thoughts on inflation and the Fed together in a thread and many other formats. Short version: economy getting better, inflation is high and likely to be at least partly persistent, Fed should recalibrate towards less expansionary policy.
Underlying this is the argument that: (1) monetary policy is a continuum, (2) it is constantly changing and has become looser recently, and (3) there really is a risk of doing too much.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(