A little more on the US-Europe comparison. Key points:

1. Output trajectory *appears* to be the same for both (with some possibility the US is ahead).

2. Inflation is much higher in the US.

3. Fiscal support likely considerably larger in US.

A 🧵.
OUTPUT. The Euro area was well behind the United States but seems to have mostly caught up as vaccinations, caseloads, and social distancing rules came closer.
3 ways to compare economic recoveries: relative to the OECD's pre-pandemic forecast, relative to pre-pandemic trends and relative to pre-pandemic levels. (The last overly favors the United States because we should have had more growth due to more favorable demography.)
Labor markets seem to have had similar recoveries too although in different ways--with more hours in the United States and higher labor force participation in Europe. (See these from the BIS and OECD, I intend to look into it more myself.)
Now the caveat to the above: it might understate the comparative strength of the United States. Gross Domestic Income showed much higher growth in Q3. And Q3 was a while ago in GDP-time, US real GDP likely much higher today than the Q3 average.
INFLATION. The United States has had both regular and core inflation running 2pp+ higher than the rates in the euro area. I look at 24 month changes to avoid base effects. Europe close to 2% avg, US is not.
(Some people show 12 month inflation but that's a mistake. Europe had much more negative inflation last year so some of what they're experiencing now is bounce back. Eg, Germany lowered its VAT in 2020 and raised it back in 2021. That lowers 2020 inflation and raised 2021.)
Here's another way of looking at inflation: where prices were in Q3 compared to pre-COVID forecasts, pre-COVID trends and pre-COVID levels. (Remember Q3 was a while ago inflation-wise, in the US CPI up 2.1% from Q3 through November.)
FISCAL SUPPORT. The most dramatic *suggestion* of how different the fiscal support is comes from looking at disposable personal income. See those two big humps in the United States? Those were the checks. Plus UI generally replaced >100% of earnings in US and <100% in euro area.
Note in the previous the US also had stronger consumption, a lot of that is probably that people had more money but maybe different social distancing rules and practices mattered too. Here is retail sales and durable volumes in US and OECD. Unlike
Of course that wasn't fiscal support. Direct comparisons are hard, I've talked to a number of experts. You can look at what countries announced or claimed but not everything got spent, lending programs sometimes counted as spending, sometimes not, some is base. Etc.
You can look at actual/projected deficits. The problem is that the 2021 numbers appear to rely a lot on what countries say. In the case of Germany, it is claiming more 2021 spending than it is really doing as part of a complex debt brake gimmick. Seems to affect the numbers.
Regardless, even taking the published numbers as given the cumulative 2020 & 2021 deficit/GDP increase in US compared to euro area is about 3pp of GDP using OECD numbers. But The US had much much more support for DPI and for businesses So believe this understates the difference.
Now some interpretation. Many differences between the US and Europe: fiscal policy, job retention programs, COVID response and timing, pre-existing institutions. Plus they are two data points among many, would not infer too much from just this one comparison.
But, roughly accords with a mental model that IF a country mostly protected disposable income in 2020 and reduced consumption then it was in a position to recover in 2021 as COVID receded and it became safe to fully engage in economic activity again.
Fiscal stimulus in 2021 could help speed the resumption of economic activity in 2021 but not by a huge amount.

Much of the difference in stimulus goes into prices.

Use your multiplier to solve for *nominal* (not real) GDP, real GDP will be what it is, & the residual is prices.
(This also roughly works for the UK where COVID constrained real output in 2021-Q2 and Q3 more than it did in the US or the euro area, so less recovery in real GDP and more of an increase in prices, see the comparative bar charts above.)
That isn't all to the story. Is possible job retention worked well in Europe to keep people connected to jobs by reducing the value of the outside option of being unemployed and giving employer's more power to push employees to return. But not sure because labor inputs similar.
Note to the degree job retention worked better in Europe it says their level of potential was less temporarily depressed in 2021 than it was in the US. So more stimulus would have been appropriate.
I'm thinking out loud here and may be overly stuck in my paradigm. Doing more work on this. Look forward to reading more careful comparative work from others--as much trying to spark discussion as provide a clean, simple answer.

FIN
P.S. No, it's not all just a shift from services consumption to goods consumption due to pandemic, policy matters too. Both goods and services are much higher than they are in Europe. h/t @RiccardoTrezzi ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Furman

Jason Furman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jasonfurman

10 Dec
The original CBO score of BBB which showed a deficit-impact that rounds to zero over ten years (and if extended would show deficit reduction over twenty years) is a more reliable guide to the likely fiscal impact of BBB than the hypothetical score they just released. A 🧵.
The programs in BBB include expirations, some of them very soon after the programs launch. It will be up to Congress how to handle these. Four possibilities:

1. Programs expire.
2. Extensions are paid for.
3. Extensions are not paid for.
4. Extensions traded for GOP extensions.
Under scenarios 1 and 2 the law would be roughly budget neutral over the next ten years and would be deficit reducing in present value. I place the greatest probability on those--is what the President says and Manchin/GOP will likely have veto power in the future.
Read 8 tweets
10 Dec
3 weeks ago I called on the Fed to pivot. Since then the data has mostly (but not entirely) strengthened my argument and the Fed is beginning to pivot.

My case relied on any *one* of these three:

1. Getting closer to max employment
2. Inflation above target
3. Policy loosening
1. The last jobs report was mixed w/ a mediocre headline number & a very strong household number (a large drop in unemployment and a rise in participation). UI claims have been plummeting and are the lowest ever (as a share of the workforce). piie.com/blogs/realtime…
On balance I think most people that follow the labor market thought the November report was strong. I don't think we're at full employment but 4.2% is a lot closer than we were. And so expansionary policy is still warranted it just doesn't need to be as/increasingly expansionary.
Read 10 tweets
10 Dec
CPI up 0.8% in November, 6.8% for the last 12 months. A lot of that was volatile energy which is coming down.

Core up 0.5%, or 4.9% for the last 12 months.

Stripping out some volatile pandemic items from core the underlying still quite high and broadly trending up.
Some items were unusually large in Nov & likely will be fall in the future (eg gasoline +6.1% & used cars at +2.5%).

But some items go the other way (rent/OER was 0.4% & that pace will almost certainly pick up, hospitals were -0.3% and transpo was 0.7% with more room to grow.)
One source of upward price pressure in November appears to have been the easing of the delta variant. The virus likely (but not definitely) reduced inflation in Aug/Sep/Oct. Pandemic services now rising again--but still have a ways to go.
Read 13 tweets
8 Dec
Part of the reason people might be upset is that this is not true. Real wages are down ~1% since the pandemic.

Your data suffer from composition bias: about 5m generally lower-wage workers are no longer employed and not having them in the data spuriously raises wages.
Moreover, the important issue is not are real wages up but by how much. They rose ~1% annually pre-COVID. They're now 2.5%-3% below where they "should" have been. See my piece with with Willie Powell that tells the broad story.
piie.com/blogs/realtime…
There are important distributional issues: real wages do appear to be up for lower wage workers, although not quite as quickly as they were rising pre-COVID.

The rest of this thread is a technical appendix--I don't recommend anyone read it. Image
Read 7 tweets
3 Dec
Willie Powell & my blog on today's (confusing) jobs numbers. We put the last year in context. Contrary to widespread belief, job growth has been near expectations--as surprisingly strong labor demand offsets surprisingly weak labor supply. A 🧵 piie.com/blogs/realtime…
To understand what was expected we use the median forecast from the Survey of Professional Forecasters. Other forecasts were similar. Overall, has slightly outpaced. Here is avg monthly jobs for 2021:

Nov 2020 forecast: 432K/month
May 2021 forecast: 562K/month
Actual: 555K/month Image
Similar story for unemployment. Back in May (the first forecast that incorporated the American Rescue Plan) the SPF expected the UR to be about 4.9% in Nov, instead it was 4.2%.

(Note, they don’t forecast labor force participation but likely would be worse than expected.)
Read 10 tweets
24 Nov
I'm not writing any more economic threads until after Thanksgiving. I hope you're not reading any until after Thanksgiving either. But in case you're weird enough to want to use the break to catch up here is a thread of some recent threads. Enjoy--or even better don't!
I put my thoughts on inflation and the Fed together in a thread and many other formats. Short version: economy getting better, inflation is high and likely to be at least partly persistent, Fed should recalibrate towards less expansionary policy.
Underlying this is the argument that: (1) monetary policy is a continuum, (2) it is constantly changing and has become looser recently, and (3) there really is a risk of doing too much.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(