If you want to understand how media manipulation & identity politics are used to weaponize black fear, we can take a look at Reuters new article about Georgia election boards *thread*
Reuters published an article titled:
"Georgia Republicans purge Black Democrats from county election boards"
The meaning of purge is to remove something but the word gives a certain negative connotation. It's a strong word and implies a negative type of removal. The article title says "purge Black Democrats" which insinuates a racial motivation for removal. Let's examine this.
Throughout the article they discuss the election disputes made by the Trump administration & their supporters. This is all politics here & I'm not interested in discussing this political aspect because I want to focus on the racial aspect since Reuters has made this racial.
"With conservative judges now choosing the county election board’s fifth member, the previous fifth member, Vera McIntosh, a Black Democrat, has been ousted. She was replaced by James Newland, who is also vice-chair of the county Republican Party."
This is not about if you agree with the moves made by Republicans, this is about understanding how race is the driving factor in this situation. Vera was ousted due to judges selecting someone else, specifically, a Republican. Let's continue...
"The law restructuring Spalding’s board also required the elections supervisor to live in the county, a change that forced out the incumbent supervisor, Marcia Ridley."
Wait, that doesn't sound unreasonable. Would you want someone from a different area being in a pivotal electoral role? You can disagree but I'm talking about if this is reasonable or not. Let's continue...
"Two other Black Democrats on the board quit: Margaret Bentley and Glenda Henley, who cited objections to the law and harassment from Trump supporters."
While I don't agree with any form of harassment, from either side, the fact is that these people quit their positions. Quitting is voluntary. Reuters is making their race the central point but they are also putting a lot of emphasis on Trump's 'false election claims'.
Throughout the article they are hammering on how influential Trump's claims were on getting SB 202 passed & changes on election boards across the state, so why is their race constantly mentioned? Why does the article make it sound like their race was the target, not the board?
Glenda Henley, one of the Democrats who quit even stated: "the board’s meetings were increasingly attended by Trump supporters crying fraud."
Those Trump supporters were angry at the election results, not at the presence of black people.
One last note in the article: "The restructured board still includes two Democrats, one of whom is Black."
This was a shitty black people purge, they left one behind!
All jokes aside, it's articles like this which make race the central point when throughout the article they are making the argument that Republicans & Trump supporters are reacting, rightly or wrongly, to the past election results.
I want to emphasize again, I don't live in Georgia & I'm not a Republican. I have no dog in this fight. But I am highly aware of the constant usage of black people's fear of oppression by the media to sell papers & get clicks.
This article fails to make the argument that SB 202 or the changes within Spalding County were racially motivated & not politically motivated. They do this all the time. Even Joe Biden called George Laws "Jim Eagle" to conjure fears of the potential return of Jim Crow.
I would encourage people to actually look into SB 202 to see what changes were made. I'm not making a declaration as to if it's good or bad, that's up to you.
No matter who you are, understand that the media has zero issue with propagandizing race and using black people's historical oppression as a sword to cut through the American psyche. Identity politics is a scourge within our society & we need to look deeper than race headlines.
Recently, there has been quite a discussion amongst black conservatives about what black culture is and I think there are missing points to this conversation. *thread*
At the essence of this debate, we are discussing individualism versus collectivism. In regards to black people, we are discussing if black people should make being black or black culture more or less important. There are pros & cons to both.
The pro for individualism is that when the collective shifts in a direction that is unhealthy or is swayed by people who are negative, then it's easier to avoid this collective wave.
To the people who would insinuate that I am being used by white conservatives or that I express 'right' leaning viewpoints for white acceptance, I have a question: Would you say this to a black liberal? *thread*
I find it very interesting when someone black expresses even a moderately right leaning viewpoint, there are people who would come out of their face to say that their opinion isn't really theirs. Why is that the case?
For example, on every major news network, you can find black liberals expressing liberal viewpoints and no one insinuates their usage as being inauthentic. Even on the right, I've never heard anyone claim that black liberals don't really believe what they're saying.
I grow tired of people using black people like a political football, throwing us from one cause to another to manufacture outrage for policy change & to appear virtuous. You people are our villains pretending to be our saviors. *thread*
Since the verdict of Kyle Rittenhouse, there has been an abundance of people, especially white leftists, who feel the need to invoke black people because they don't like the way things turned out. If you are this person, fuck you.
I normally don't speak this harshly but you people always grab microphones to speak for black people as if you are our saviors. You believe you're these virtuous heavenly soldiers here to save us weak black people, when you're the exact devil we don't need.
I once had a friend, a white liberal female, who used to joke with me about woke people, post riots, suddenly sounds just like them. As we were arguing she said "Well, I listen to black voices" and I said "I'm black, does my voice matter?"
We used to have conversations about what it means to be black from a philosophical standpoint. Then suddenly, there is only one black thought. My voice was no longer acceptable. Matter of fact, I was now tainted as a friend.
This is a person that I would spend holidays with her family, hang out routinely and have long conversations with. Suddenly, my voice no longer matters as a black man because it's been overshadowed by ideologues who only see one proper way of being black.
Funny Honeymoon Story Thread: We decided to go to Turkey for a mixture of city exploring in Istanbul and beach life in Antalya.
After walking a lot in Istanbul and being sore, I figured I would throw out the idea of getting a massage while in Antalya...
We found a place nearby with good reviews. Went by early and made an appointment and clearly stated we just wanted a massage. We showed up a few hours later and they were ready for us. We changed and now wearing just a towel. There is a clear language barrier fyi...
They tell us to go into the sauna for a few. Then a man comes in with just a towel on and asks us questions in broken English. "Scrub?" We look at each other and say "massage". He says it's not extra, part of the cost we agreed upon. So we're like okay...