These cowardly gaslighting hypocrites say they object to sensible COVID measures on the grounds of the fear it could lead to a gradual creep towards more draconian restrictions, while supporting ACTUAL draconian antidemocratic laws & the systematic removal of basic human rights.
One of his first actions after becoming an MP was to join the unhinged hard-right ERG
As you might expect, his grotesque, vile & divisive rhetoric signifies he's just another confused, arrogant, & condescending individual, with views that belong in the 1950s.
About local crime, the regressive 'law & order' throwback said: "It is impossible to start thinking about remedies to these issues without also being ready to confront the possibility that a disproportionate number of crimes are committed by individuals from CERTAIN COMMUNITIES."
The Ipswich & Suffolk Council for Racial Equality called his comments "at best disappointing and at worst an ill-judged piece of dogwhistling."
Even the @Conservatives' Police & Crime Commissioner, Tim Passmore, referred to them as "very unhelpful".
Following an interim report on the connections between colonialism & @nationaltrust properties, Hunt was among the signatories of a letter to The Telegraph from the unhinged & reactionary "Common Sense Group" of Conservative Parliamentarians.
The letter accused the National Trust of being "coloured by cultural Marxist dogma, colloquially known as the 'woke agenda'".
"Cultural Marxism" is the debunked, hateful & divisive antisemitic conspiracy theory that inspired far-right terrorist Anders Breivik.
In another bullshit toxic culture war statement, he said that Historic England are "waging a war against our heritage", and considers their approach to explaining slavery at their sites as "Maoist & dystopian".
Just another Tory using dangerous & inflammatory far-right rhetoric.
Since being elected as an MP for Ipswich in 2019, Hunt has used social media to gaslight his constituents.
In March 2021, he denied claims made by Councillors that he'd refused to meet with front-line key workers, saying that this was due to earlier disputes with #TUC members.
In April 2021, echoing authoritarian populist nationalists the world over, Hunt called for the flying of the Union Jack to be made compulsory in all schools, stating on Twitter that "If any pupils & teachers have concerns about this then surely they can be educated." 😱
Inevitably, in 2021 Hunt voted for a controversial bill that would have reversed the 30 day suspension of Owen Paterson.
It's obvious this divisive clown wants to make a name for himself, & he represents everything wrong with Britain. Imho, he'd be more at home in Britain First.
And now he's voting against sensible COVID measures, despite having spent last #Christmas alone - BECAUSE HE HAD COVID!
At the time he said: “What I would really have struggled with would have been any sense that I myself had given him (his dad) #COVID19."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
GB "News", which employs 75% of Reform UK MPs, is not a news channel - it's Reform's propaganda wing, co-funded by billionaire Paul Marshall and Dubai-based investment firm Legatum, who see it as an investment opportunity to help protect their wealth and interests.
@Ofcom
In the UK, since 1990, 'due impartiality' and 'due accuracy' have been fundamental components of broadcasting - especially for news and current affairs - and imho are essential for a well-informed citizenry and a fair-minded functional democracy.
GB "News" appears to disagree.
The first broadcasting standards in the UK emerged with the BBC in 1922.
Formal standards took shape with the Royal Charter in 1927, which mandated that the BBC provide information, education, and entertainment while maintaining impartiality and serving the public interest.
Voters need to know how right-wing populist nationalist politicians and radical/far-right nativist extremists construct their divisive discourse and rhetoric to exploit the anti-elite climate and fuel violence and division - and what to do about it.
So what can be done to counter divisive narratives and framing and to help Britain to become a more open, inclusive, fairer, less polarised and better multicultural society?
I make several suggestions in the above article, but make more below,
Countering the extreme right’s narrative of feeling "attacked" and needing to "defend" national identity requires a strategic, multi-faceted approach that challenges their framing while addressing underlying concerns and emotions.
The shameless lie that "Britain is lawless" is categorically false, as it contradicts empirical data on crime trends, rule of law metrics, and the functioning of UK institutions. Reform UK often use fearmongering exaggeration and selective framing to create a sense of crisis.
Official data from the ONS and Home Office indicate that overall crime rates in England and Wales have fluctuated but do not support the notion of a "lawless" state. The ONS reported a 7% decrease in total recorded crime (excluding fraud) from 2023 to 24.
#OnThisDay, 21 July, 1969, the Chicago Daily News published: The ‘love it or leave it’ nonsense, by Sydney J. Harris.
It began: One of the most ignorant and hateful statements that a person can make is “If you don’t like it here, why don’t you leave?”
I reproduce it, below.
Harris was born in London in 1917, moving to the US in 1922. A formidable journalist who established a distinct voice integrating incisive social commentary with wit and humour, his weekday column, ‘Strictly Personal’, was syndicated in 200 US newspapers.
The ‘love it or leave it’ nonsense, by Sydney J. Harris.
One of the most ignorant and hateful statements that a person can make is “If you don’t like it here, why don’t you leave?”
That attitude is the main reason America was founded, in all its hope and energy and goodness.
A few thoughts on Bob Vylan leading the #GlastonburyFestival crowd in chants of "Death to the IDF" (Israeli Defence Force), livestreamed by the @BBC, and the mischaracterisation of the chant by some MPs, news media, and activists.
In England, where #GlastonburyFestival is located, all of us have the right to freely express our criticism of anyone or anything - as long as there is no intent to provoke immediate unlawful violence or there is a reasonable likelihood it will occur as a consequence.
In England, free speech is protected under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998. However, inciting violence is a criminal offence under several laws which attempt to balance public safety with free expression rights.
In many countries, especially since Musk bought Twitter/@X, underregulated online extreme content has been used to groom and radicalise vulnerable people.
Too many cowardly politicians are scared to speak up for fear of being branded 'anti-free speech'.