1) Not getting the whole Text hullabaloo. I said the same stuff - that Trump needed to send a loud and clear message to calm the chaos at the Capitol on Jan 6. I was frustrated that it took him the time it did to do so. But AT THE SAME TIME, just like everyone else that day...
2)...I had no idea who the idiots were at the Capitol that were causing the mayhem. Were they antifa? Were they just a bunch of losers who got out of control? I had no clue. Neither did the various Fox hosts who people are being ripped on today for the texts. What's the issue?
3) What's so "damning?" They didn't know who was causing the chaos AND they also wanted Trump to try to calm the situation down, because he was the POTUS. So what? What new information is this telling us that is making this such a giant story this am?
4) This is the same reaction I had on air on Jan 7th. I wished Trump would speak out sooner and with more firmness. And I had no idea who all the nutcases were who were busting into the Capitol. And? How do these new texts change anything at all? They certainly don't make...
5)...Trump any more or less responsible for what happened that day. They don't make media hosts or elected officials who had the same reaction any more or less responsible for what happened that day. Where's the smoking gun here?🤷‍♀️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chicks On The Right

Chicks On The Right Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chicksonright

12 Oct
Suggested ?s for @PressSec today, @pdoocy.

1. Without using the words "task force" or "envoy" or "discussions" or "conversations," what Actual Action has been taken by this administration to combat the supply chain issues the US faces?
2. What specific ACTIONS are being taken to thwart the thousands of migrants currently headed to our border (same rules apply as in #1).
3. Without referring us to the VP's office, please explain why tax dollars were spent on child actors to pretend to care about Kamala and space, and why the VP has not provided any updates about her extensive work at the border?
Read 9 tweets
9 Jan
Pretty chilling what @BrandonStraka just said on FNC. It's not just that his page was pulled from FB. It's that every page admin/employee/contractor/associate of his page was pulled from FB PERSONALLY. What does that mean? Well...
2) It means that if you're a gig worker (videographer, editor, writer, etc.) and you were simply fulfilling a contract for a gig to earn a living, and you didn't even give a crap about what Brandon's page was all about, you just lost access to OTHER GIGS. Why? Well....
3) Because social media platforms are what connects us all to each other. If your personal page was the admin for your own business gig page, then your business gig page is gone too as a result. And what does that mean? Well...
Read 8 tweets
9 Jul 20
1)Let’s play this out, then. A trans man is offered the part that Halle Berry just STUNNINGLY AND BRAVELY gave up, simply because he’s trans and our culture now requires it.

It’s now somehow bigoted or culturally appropriative -
2) or whatever new term is made up in the next 10 minutes to have someone NOT trans play a trans part. We’ll firmly plant ourselves in “Only trans men can play trans men” mode, so the new complaint’ll eventually be that trans people are being typecast...
3) and only getting to act in trans people roles. So what then? I guess trans people will demand to play non-trans people roles, because they’ll naturally want to play parts that stretch and grow and challenge them...
Read 10 tweets
12 May 20
So I'm looking for some clarity here. If the purpose of wearing masks is to prevent coughed or sneezed or "moistly-said" droplets from reaching others, it doesn't matter if I re-use the same mask again and again and touch it as much as I want, right? (Thread)
2) Because a non-N95 mask isn't about protecting me from getting the virus, it's ostensibly about stopping my coughs/sneezes from reaching others as easily as they otherwise might. Homemade cloth masks do next to nothing to prevent the wearer from becoming infected, and yet...
3) I keep seeing people criticizing others for touching their own masks or adjusting them, etc. Who cares if the wearer touches their own mask? They're not wearing the mask to avoid getting sick. I mean, sure, they should avoid touching their face as a general rule, but...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(