Plenty of people are calling for an imminent stock market crash, but they are missing a key point: inflation-adjusted interest rates are still way below the estimated equilibrium levels!
Why does that matter?
1/11
Real yields are very relevant for savers, investors, borrowers and asset class valuations: it's not only the absolute level that matters though, but also the relative level against the equilibrium real interest rate (r*).
A low absolute risk-free real interest rate matters as:
1) It punishes savers and investors by rewarding very little (or even inflicting negative returns) on savings and risk-free investments
2) It helps borrowers to reduce their real debt servicing cost, as debts are inflated away while nominal interest rate costs remain low. With the same real income, borrowers are now able to ''afford'' more debt as servicing costs are lower
3) As long as earnings and nominal economic activity deliver, very low risk-free real interest rates will help drive portfolio inflows into risk assets and encourage higher valuations.
But it's not all about the absolute level: real yields relative to the equilibrium level r* are also very important
R* is the equilibrium real interest rate the economy can withstand while generating its potential, long-term growth and without overheating or cooling down too much
R* is influenced by long-term drivers of real economic growth, and in particular by the growth of the active workforce (labor supply growth), its productivity and capital productivity.
The equilibrium rate r* has obviously been trending down fast over the last 40 years as our active workforce keeps growing less and less (ageing population), disruptive technologies advance at a very fast pace and capital misallocation is all over the place.
Hence, lower real yields are a trend likely to stay but what matters is ''how low'' they are against estimates of r* -> my own model points to r* being negative (!) in EU.
Nevertheless, observed real yields are now very low not only in absolute terms, but also against r*.
In 2013 (taper tantrum) and 2018 (equity market sell-off), real rates significantly overshoot r* for a while causing distress in the system which ultimately turned into risk-off episodes.
Today, US real yields are 100 bps+ below estimated equilibrium levels and that implies that monetary and financial conditions are still very loose: the doomsayers might have to wait a bit longer.
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Answering the top 10 questions I received in a previous tweet, here we go!
1/10
Question #1: ''Why is 10yr not going up with Fed about to finish QE/star hiking/inflation printing high?''
A: 10y yields are roughly the sum of 10y real rates, 10y CPI expectations and term premium. When the Fed tightens, the medium/long-end of the bond market extrapolates lower nominal growth going forward (= lower rates) and more certainty about this outcome (= lower term premium)
Over the last few years, I had sometimes the chance to meet and talk with very high level decision makers - sometimes even PMs and Central Banks’ board members!
Here is a couple of fun episodes.
1/5
Once I had dinner with the former Prime Minister of a G10 country.
We were half drunk, and I asked him why his country was not investing in financial literacy, education and other long-term easy wins. His answer?
2/5
“Young man, I have to get re-elected in few years, and the benefits of those reforms would be huge but I won’t be there to reap the political benefits. So we’d rather do some short-term unproductive but easy-to-market stimulus to get some votes”.
Commercial banks print money.
They are able to extend credit to the real economy, temporarily boosting aggregate demand and GDP.
They are not doing that, and it's key to pay attention!
Why?
1/10
The chart above shows the 2y mov.avg. of the growth in US bank lending to the real economy. It therefore excludes mortgages, but it includes commercial, industrial and consumer loans - basically credit that ends up on the account of consumers the engines of the real economy
2/10
It's now running at a very modest +1.6% on an annualized basis, peaking from the +5.0% reached in early 2020 when governments effectively guaranteed the majority of the credit risk on bank loans during the first stages of the pandemic.
This is the amount of the $-denominated loans and bonds sitting on the balance sheet of entities domiciled outside the US
The death of the USD has been called for times and times again (last: '20-21): it's an easy narrative, but caution is required
1/8
Our economic and monetary system is based on continuous credit creation.
The US sits at the epicenter of this system as they enjoy the benefit of issuing the global reserve currency to the world: the majority of trades, settlements, payments across the world happen in USD.
2/8
As @patrick_saner shows, the world is highly leveraged towards the USD: while the US only accounts for 15% of global GDP, 50% of global trade invoices and 75% of global securities issuance are $-denominated. Wow.
Yesterday I asked people on FinTwit to ask questions about how QE works and what are its consequences on the economy and asset prices, and I promised to answer to the 10 most interesting questions.
Here we are: the questions were awesome, buckle up!
0/10
Q: ''Why does the following QE process NOT create money? An asset manager sells a gov bond to the CB & receives a bank deposit, which it can use to buy a new bond from the gov, which in turn can spend the proceeds of that new bond sale into the real economy''
A: in this example, the only creator of inflationary forms of money is the government that prints additional deficits; the Central Bank simply swapped the gov bond for a bank deposit on the asset manager balance sheet.