Commercial banks print money.
They are able to extend credit to the real economy, temporarily boosting aggregate demand and GDP.
They are not doing that, and it's key to pay attention!
Why?
1/10
The chart above shows the 2y mov.avg. of the growth in US bank lending to the real economy. It therefore excludes mortgages, but it includes commercial, industrial and consumer loans - basically credit that ends up on the account of consumers the engines of the real economy
2/10
It's now running at a very modest +1.6% on an annualized basis, peaking from the +5.0% reached in early 2020 when governments effectively guaranteed the majority of the credit risk on bank loans during the first stages of the pandemic.
3/10
As the government guarantee on loans fades away, banks have been very reluctant to lend to the real economy at a sustained pace.
This is because banks lend when the trade-off amongst those 3 factors looks appealing...
4/10
A) Loan yields (the higher the better)
B) Borrowers' creditworthiness (the less leveraged, the better)
C) Regulation (less capital requirements = good)
The trade-off looks horrible today, and has looked bad for a while.
5/10
Loan yields are very low as a combination of risk-free yields and credit spreads being compressed.
The private sector is hugely leveraged and the few healthy balance sheet agents do not want/require credit.
6/10
Regulation is pretty tight, requiring banks to attach significant capital to their lending activity and hence constraining return on equity (RoE).
The regulatory pressure has increased materially since the GFC - regulators have probably overcompensated.
7/10
Hence, banks are not lending to the real economy and they are unlikely to do so - this materially slows down credit creation and hence an important engine for economic growth.
Net bank lending is a very important contributor to my timely G5 Credit Impulse prop indicator.
8/10
Did I mention QE? No. And for a reason.
The amount of bank reserves is basically irrelevant for bank lending activity - you can flood the system with as many reserves as you want, but this is not going to change the picture described above.
Banks don't lend reserves.
9/10
Japan shows the way.
Base money (red line) = BoJ balance sheet.
Bank loans (blue line) = net increase in bank lending.
Not a positive correlation.
Not a zero correlation.
A NEGATIVE correlation.
Banks don't lend reserves, and they don't think about reserves when lending
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is the amount of the $-denominated loans and bonds sitting on the balance sheet of entities domiciled outside the US
The death of the USD has been called for times and times again (last: '20-21): it's an easy narrative, but caution is required
1/8
Our economic and monetary system is based on continuous credit creation.
The US sits at the epicenter of this system as they enjoy the benefit of issuing the global reserve currency to the world: the majority of trades, settlements, payments across the world happen in USD.
2/8
As @patrick_saner shows, the world is highly leveraged towards the USD: while the US only accounts for 15% of global GDP, 50% of global trade invoices and 75% of global securities issuance are $-denominated. Wow.
Yesterday I asked people on FinTwit to ask questions about how QE works and what are its consequences on the economy and asset prices, and I promised to answer to the 10 most interesting questions.
Here we are: the questions were awesome, buckle up!
0/10
Q: ''Why does the following QE process NOT create money? An asset manager sells a gov bond to the CB & receives a bank deposit, which it can use to buy a new bond from the gov, which in turn can spend the proceeds of that new bond sale into the real economy''
A: in this example, the only creator of inflationary forms of money is the government that prints additional deficits; the Central Bank simply swapped the gov bond for a bank deposit on the asset manager balance sheet.
Let me share with you my main tools to navigate markets: The Macro Compass.
It's a cross-asset allocation tool that serves as a big picture indication of what's coming next, and it helped me generate excess risk-adjusted returns over the years.
1/10
The Macro Compass is a 4-quadrants asset allocation tool, which uses two main inputs: the global credit impulse and the relative monetary policy stance.
The global credit impulse is my prop indicator that measures the pace of growth of credit creation amongst G5 economies
2/10
Credit creation is the real ''money printing'': when credit gets extended, new money is created out of thin air and handed over to the private sector
Commercial banks (net lending) and governments (net fiscal spending) are responsible for the lion share of credit creation.
Evergrande panic? I can almost hear you asking for it...here is your Chinese thread!
From a panoramic macro perspective, chances that a widespread financial market panic unfolds are relatively low - it will mostly depend on the Chinese authorities reaction.
1/n
The chart below shows the % of Chinese households wealth in real estate - 74%, quite high.
For comparison, US households own <30% of their wealth in real estate.
This tells us:
- The Chinese economy is not very financialized
- Real estate matters for the CH household
How much?
74% of wealth concentrated in real estate is quite a lot, yes.
But 74% of what?
The chart below shows Chinese HH net assets (value of assets - liabilities).
In 2019, Chinese household net assets were RMB 500 trn = approx. 70k USD net wealth per each Chinese adult.