Alf Profile picture
4 Dec, 4 tweets, 1 min read
#Bitcoin is here to stay.

It's the asset attracting the most polarized opinions ever: either it's worth 0 or we'll have the BTC standard.

Often, the truth sits in the middle: Bitcoin is a highly-leveraged call option on how many people will believe it's a call option.

1/3
In a world where we rely on incremental borrowing to kick the can down the road, real yields will remain low and real wages stagnant.

But the lion share of the population is excluded from the asset price wealth effect and doesn't get a purchasing power boost from real wages

2/3
If your purchasing power is eroded from negative real yields on your savings and stagnant real wages, you strive for a quick way out.

You need big leverage.

Boomers had the real estate market deliver for them.
Gen Z is giving digital assets a shot, and so far so good.

3/4
I treat BTC as a very leveraged call option on a high-beta underlying.

It's a very simple approach that sits in the middle between ''it's worth zero'' and ''I denominate 100% of my savings in BTC''.

Size your risk in this asset class appropriately.

4/4

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alf

Alf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MacroAlf

6 Dec
Yesterday I asked people on FinTwit to ask questions about how QE works and what are its consequences on the economy and asset prices, and I promised to answer to the 10 most interesting questions.

Here we are: the questions were awesome, buckle up!

0/10
Q: ''Why does the following QE process NOT create money? An asset manager sells a gov bond to the CB & receives a bank deposit, which it can use to buy a new bond from the gov, which in turn can spend the proceeds of that new bond sale into the real economy''
A: in this example, the only creator of inflationary forms of money is the government that prints additional deficits; the Central Bank simply swapped the gov bond for a bank deposit on the asset manager balance sheet.

1/10
Read 21 tweets
3 Dec
I am so glad to be back!

Let me share with you my main tools to navigate markets: The Macro Compass.

It's a cross-asset allocation tool that serves as a big picture indication of what's coming next, and it helped me generate excess risk-adjusted returns over the years.

1/10
The Macro Compass is a 4-quadrants asset allocation tool, which uses two main inputs: the global credit impulse and the relative monetary policy stance.

The global credit impulse is my prop indicator that measures the pace of growth of credit creation amongst G5 economies

2/10
Credit creation is the real ''money printing'': when credit gets extended, new money is created out of thin air and handed over to the private sector

Commercial banks (net lending) and governments (net fiscal spending) are responsible for the lion share of credit creation.

3/10
Read 10 tweets
24 Sep
The fixed income market is selling off and people are all over the place trying to interpret the move.

Let me help you out - what’s moving and why?

A quality thread for the nice FinTwit people

1/n
Move in nominal yields can be decomposed into inflation expectations and real yields

10y US inflation swaps topped in May and have plateaued ever since - no move over the last days

All the action is in real yields (see pic) which were on the way up already before the Fed.
Higher real yields are generally healthy for markets if they reflect sustainably higher economic growth down the road.

But 2022 US GDP consensus estimates have recently been revised down (see pic), and the same goes for earnings growth forecasts.

So, why higher real yields?
Read 8 tweets
20 Sep
Evergrande panic? I can almost hear you asking for it...here is your Chinese thread!

From a panoramic macro perspective, chances that a widespread financial market panic unfolds are relatively low - it will mostly depend on the Chinese authorities reaction.

1/n
The chart below shows the % of Chinese households wealth in real estate - 74%, quite high.
For comparison, US households own <30% of their wealth in real estate.

This tells us:

- The Chinese economy is not very financialized
- Real estate matters for the CH household

How much?
74% of wealth concentrated in real estate is quite a lot, yes.
But 74% of what?

The chart below shows Chinese HH net assets (value of assets - liabilities).

In 2019, Chinese household net assets were RMB 500 trn = approx. 70k USD net wealth per each Chinese adult.

Pretty solid
Read 13 tweets
19 Sep
People obsess about outright yield levels, but curve shapes are at least equally important.

The US yield curve has been flattening relentlessly since May this year - chart below shows the yield differential between 5y and 30y US bonds.

This is paramount important.

1/n
Yield differentials between short and long-end of the curve inform you about investors’ expectations on interest rates years down the line.

A steep yield curve means investors demand compensation (term premium) to own long bonds vs rolling ownership of short bonds each time
Premium for what risk?
It can be inflation, (real) duration or credit risk.

In this case, the curve has become flatter so investors demand less premium to own long end bonds - the distribution of probabilities of future interest rates has become easier to predict.

What changed?
Read 8 tweets
16 Sep
Very unpopular take, but backed by facts.
And I care much more about facts than opinions.

House prices are NOT expensive, when measured as one should reasonably do: in real terms, assuming a 10% down-payment and the remaining 90% financed with a fixed-rate mortgage.

1/4
The median US house price has gone up 2.4x times since 1990.
In real terms, we are looking at a whopping 70% price increase over the last 10 years.

But houses are not paid for 100% in cash.
The median home buyer finances 88% of the house price with a fixed-rate mortgage.

2/4
What's really relevant is how much these mortgage installments weigh on your net monthly income.
The red line in the chart measures just that, with the index = 100 in 1990 for comparison.

So how can (mortgage payments / real wages) be pretty low if house prices are high?

3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(