Quick thought on @trussliz appointment to #brexit file is that it’s in principle a ‘good thing’ that it’s back in Foreign Office. Brexit should be seen in context of wider EU relations. Too often it hasn’t.
BUT it will be challenging for her politically…/1
Because as we know the right of the Tory party is in revolt and @DavidGHFrost spent a lot of time pandering to them.
Just three months ago they were being promised Article 16, mutual enforcement and the eradication of the internal border Boris built/2
Frost essentially promised in his Command paper to unwind that mistake. Go back to 2019, mutual enforcement, technology…basically wishing the Irish Trilemma away.
Now he’s walked off, he’ll be there, saying “if only”…usual Brexiter dreaming /3
But @trussliz is going to have to disappoint them if she wants a deal — as (for now) @BorisJohnson purportedly does, tho he’s quite capable of finding an excuse to change his mind.
The point is that in #brexit it’s the specifics that kills you. /4
Talking up trade deals; talking tough on Putin or making rah-rah speeches to Chatham House about freedom…that’s all easy-peasy route to the top of the @ConHome rankings.
But in Brexit, breeziness or bullying only gets you so far. Ask David Davis. Or Frost for that matter./5
It may be that @BorisJohnson softening on NI Protocol has done the hard part for @trussliz — but the deal, when it’s done, is still going to leave a proper trade border inside the U.K. — the border that Johnson said would never be there; and Frost said he’d get rid off /6
Logically @trussliz should get what she can on easement and move on. But as we’ve seen, #brexit for that fantasy wing of the party had always been about emotion, not logic. It will not be easy for the ever-chirpy Ms Truss to disappoint them. /7
I broadly agree with @Mij_Europe analysis that the appointment tends to deal/normalisation — not least because there’s a lots else to worry about.
But the history of #brexit has frequently defied common sense analysis. ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺☕️🚛⚙️✈️🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨#Brexit means Brexit. Or if you’re a small company trading into the EU, it means setting up in Netherlands; or if a haulier, giving up on EU business; or fighting to trade with NI.
So starting with Hampstead Teas, run by Kiran Tawadey which sells probiotic teas across the UK, EU and rest of world
On Jan 1 she is shutting down her small Milton Keynes blending and packing plant. Five jobs will go. It's now "too complicated" to run. /2
She already moved her distribution to the Netherlands, so now she can import into EU with single large shipments, clear customs and VAT once and then freely distribute to EU 27.
And now her Oz and Japanese customers want supplying out of the EU also /3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺⚗️🧪👩🔬🥼🧪⚗️👩🔬🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨Post-#Brexit chemicals regime risks UK being a “dumping ground” for toxic substances, warn environmental groups. My @ft latest.
@FT So. This relates to UK chemical regulation after Brexit.
You'll recall that as an EU member the UK followed the EU REACH regulation for chemicals. But after #Brexit we're setting up our own version.
As of Jan 1, we've been free to diverge from EU rules/2
@FT And in one area -- substances of 'very high concern' or SVHCs -- it is now clear that the UK is going to diverge and take a different approach from the EU.
How do we know this? Well, very quietly the UK government slipped out a notice last week. Here/3.
NEW: UK gov is to give biz another two years to adjust to post-#Brexit UK REACH chemicals safety database that industry warned would cost £1bn to needlessly duplicate EU REACH...more encouraging 'pragmatism' /1
This was slipped out y'day (no fanfare, you note) in a letter from George Eustice, environment secretary, to Chemical Industries Association @See_Chem_Bus acknowledging the huge cost of the scheme/2
@See_Chem_Bus Regular readers will recall that back in February, 25 industry bosses wrote to government demanding a radical rethink of the plan to essentially duplicate the EU's REACH safety database...warning it was going to cost £1bn for zero gain /3
EU frustration growing with U.K. not closing deal on medicines. Tactically, though, you can see the U.K. won’t want to hand EU a ‘Win’ in the magnanimity stakes until they’ve got more on customs/borders /1
But at the same time, the Commission isn’t going to move so far on customs/borders until it knows U.K and Frost are serious about a deal within the limits of the Protocol.
We are back to the “who jumps first?” #brexit negotiation conundrum /2
But that itself is made so much harder by the lack of any EU trust in Frost, whose style (from internal market bill move in 2020 onwards) has been all about threat and confrontation. /3
@FT@AJack What's going on? Well, simple really. After #Brexit the new immigration rules did two things:
a) insisted all EU kids had passports (not ID cards) to come to UK and
b) non-EU kids in same class needed full visas
That's a *disaster* for EU school trips industry /2
@FT@AJack So it's not impossible to come to UK...but for a budget trip of a 3-5 days, getting everyone new passports...but worse getting your Afghan, Armenian, Turkish classmates a visa (£95, trip to embassy in Paris/Berlin etc) it just makes it impractical/uneconomic /3
@ManufacturingNI@Big_Kells The UK govt plan is apparently designed to defend NI economy...but it's hard to think, if the UK is not properly applying EU single market rules at the Irish Sea border, that NI businesses will keep their special access to EU single market. /2
@ManufacturingNI@Big_Kells Take all those NI milk producers that send milk to the South to be processed and then shipped onwards....and many of those agricultural interests are Unionist. A full blown London-Dublin-Brussels spat really does nothing for them. /3