Past 24h on Twitter people have explained to me:
Brussels geography (thanks, but I lived 4yrs there and go all the time)
Schengen (thanks, but I ran a campaign website about it, blogged on it years)
Repairing electronics (my tweet was about how I’ve been repairing for years)
Brussels geography (thanks, but I lived 4yrs there and go all the time)
Schengen (thanks, but I ran a campaign website about it, blogged on it years)
Repairing electronics (my tweet was about how I’ve been repairing for years)
Timetables of night trains (thanks, but I work on this, and run @TrainsForEurope)
Mechanics of a Tory leadership contest (thanks, but do you think I’ve not checked it before writing about it?)
Mechanics of a Tory leadership contest (thanks, but do you think I’ve not checked it before writing about it?)
Really folks, I might well be WRONG with the conclusions I draw, but I’m not ill informed. It might be a fair assumption that I have checked the background!
We ought to all have this assumption towards everyone we interact with here - that they do know the background until they’ve demonstrated they haven’t.
So please folks, by all means point out I’m wrong. But give it a rest assuming I’m an idiot who has done no background research.
/ends
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
