"WESC are once again recommending that any adult male should be free, on his say so alone, to change his birth certificate to say he had been born the female sex, and for it to be a criminal offence for officials to reveal that he had in fact been born the male sex" /2
"this second WESC inquiry hasn’t even grasped the basics on why sex self-ID presents problems for women and girls. The 2015 WESC inquiry didn’t bother to invite feminists to explain their concerns, this time they did invite us to speak, but they clearly didn’t listen" /3
Read the transcript of the interview on @BBCr4today when @Marthakearney asked @carolinenokes about the problem of not knowing what sex someone was born she said:
@carolinenokes knows, or at least should know, the answer to “Why on earth would we want to” know the sex someone was born. It was explained in hundred of written submissions, given in oral evidence, and the answer from Fair Play For Women was quoted in her own WESC report /5
If one law is based on knowing birth sex & another law allows people to hide birth sex, there is a clear & obvious clash. This is at the heart of the sex vs gender debate. What was the point of her inquiry if it didn’t result in her understanding the very basics of the issue? /6
Not everyone at WESC agreed with the recommendations. Notably, @JackieDP (a recent addition to the WESC) proposed that the recommendation to support sex-self ID was removed. The majority voted for it to remain /7
@JackieDP Draft recommendations said “additional legal tests” should be added to improve safeguards such as refusing or revoking a GRC to males convicted of violent or sexual offences. @KimJohnsonMP proposed these safeguards are removed. The majority agreed except @JackieDP /8
@JackieDP@KimJohnsonMP One concession that remained in the WESC recommendations was that “male prisoners with a record of sexual assault or domestic violence, who self-identify as a woman, should not be transferred to a woman’s prison”. /9
@JackieDP@KimJohnsonMP Fair Play For Women had set out in both oral and written evidence how making it easier to get a GRC would inevitably lead to a rise in male prisoners moving into female prisons. /10
@JackieDP@KimJohnsonMP WESC also touched on language, data and women's sport. Each time WESC recommending closer working with trans rights groups.
The first step to solving this issue is to acknowledge that the views of more than one group matter on this issue. WESC failed to grasp even this /11
@JackieDP@KimJohnsonMP This inquiry has been little more than a platform for a small group of MPs to once again promote their view of “trans rights”. /12
@JackieDP@KimJohnsonMP Women engaged with the inquiry in good faith with the hope that this would be a serious and fair assessment of the conflict of rights. Thousands of hours have been dedicated to providing evidence. Our concerns have not been listened to – but that’s no surprise. /13
@JackieDP@KimJohnsonMP What matters is that our collective concerns are now on the parliamentary record. We now have an incredible resource and next time someone says “But why on earth would we want to?” you’ll have the answers at your finger tips.
"The appellant’s interest in being issued with an "X" passport is outweighed by considerations relating to the public interest put forward by the Secretary of State" /2
Fair Play For Women sought permission to intervene to represent the interests of women and girls. Permission was not granted but our submission made it clear this was not simply an admin matter. The outcome impacts others. /3
Last week Fair Play For Women threatened a judicial review if the deadline for public responses was not extended.
Today, the Government has conceded and will announce the deadline is to be extended by a further 8 weeks, more than doubling the consultation period to 14 weeks /2.
Two autistic women joined Fair Play For Women as co-claimants threatening legal action accusing the Government of breaking disability discrimination laws. /3
Legal action is an important tool in protecting the sex-based rights of women & girls. Supporters tell us they do, too. The right legal outcome can set a precedent, or stop one, and show public bodies they will be held to account. /1
When we raised funds to fight the ONS, we pledged to use any money left over to explore ways in which we can use the law to re-establish our boundaries /2
We’ve obtained legal advice on a range of issues, so we can identify the best ways to use the courts to help our cause. It’s not enough that something seems unfair or illogical; there also has to be a strong legal basis and an appropriate legal route to challenge or redress /3
THREAD: Fair Play For Women is back in court defending the meaning of sex. This time its the Scottish Government wanting to change sex into gender identity in the Scottish Census /1
The Scottish guidance is unlawful. It says people may self-identify when answering the sex question in the census.
“If you are transgender the answer you give can be different from what is on your birth certificate. You do not need a Gender Recognition Certificate. /2
The Scottish Government is ignoring the UK-wide 1920 Census Act and our win in the English High Court that sex CANNOT be self-identified /3
THREAD: Yesterday BBC2 are rather bland and uninspiring 90 minute documentary called "womanhood". But within it they spared 15 mins to cover "the trans debate". 😱 /1
First they went to a night club to meet a transgender woman called Evie. Evie passes so well that even the fiancée of 4 years didn't know his girlfriend had been born male. Cue lots of cooing and smiles from the celebs and Shirley Ballas asking the obvious question /2
Tense music.... the celebs are preparing for their next interview. Suzi tells us how she fears they might be "platforming some quite hateful views". She tells us how toxic it is and how it becomes a "slagging match". Suzi resolutely declares "I don't want any part of that!". /3