Agree ✅
-Linguistics is valid
-Grouping into ‘families’-reasonable
-Borrowing words between languages quite common
-Genes don’t code for language. Genetics show movement of people, not necessarily languages
-‘Dravidian’ languages have large % root words different from संस्कृतम्
Issues ❌
PIE linguistics deployed to claim
-Aryans invaded/migrated to India, defeated Dravidians, brought संस्कृतम्/Vedas here
-Aryan & Dravidian fundamentally 2 different people & culture based on language
If linguists believe the above, then should debate the reasons
If PIE evidence is deployed by Witzel, Anthony etc, then the claims are fair debate points
Rarely see any meaningful response from professional linguists re: problems with these Indological claims
Debate gets fouled up in extraneous factors 😎(validity of linguistic theories)
In conclusion
Does fundamental validity of linguistics as a science, automatically validate PIE theory & by extension, Aryan Invasion/Migration theory?
Is it ONLY possible that संस्कृतम् came unidirectionally INTO India?
There is no other directional possibility at all?
Are Aryans & Dravidians fundamentally different people/cultures / nations based on linguistics & cultural differences?
Given this half-joking tweet, lets actually do honest work 😀& check out claimed provenance of PIE *ḱorkeh₂ as origin of शर्करा [Samskritam] which then spread globally as sugar,azucar, zucker etc
Samskritam has one of the largest repositories of Drama & stage productions. Right from भरतमुनिः who wrote नाट्यशास्त्रम्, the treasures within संस्कृतम् is amazing
Here is a collation of traditional & modern नाटकानि in संस्कृतम्।