@jhakjhorvaa महोदयेन मार्जितं कूजनम्।

Think its important to review the complaint in detail

१ भारतीयाः wallow in the past

२ All useless talk. No action

३ Feelgoodism

Basically, we need a new avatar to help us with research, show us the way & lead us ‘out of the wilderness’ Image
This is the tweet topic

Hortus Malabaricus was 40 years ahead of Linnean classification & was basically compiled by vaidyas/botanists in S. India

The cognitive dissonance & embarrassment many भारतीयाः feel when reading a perfectly valid statement is an interesting phenomenon!
To answer @jhakjhorvaa महोदयः let us actually look at Hortus and what it says - and see whether the embarrassment is appropriate!

See the notes section

Please note the INDICI for the region and the year 1673

Post Modern historians - ‘India was never a cohesive unit’ 😂🤣 ImageImage
Now let us look at the authors, respected ‘native doctors’

itti achudem (Itti Achuthan from Cochin) & who is a ‘chego’ (Chekavan/Ezhava/Thiyya)
&
The ‘Brahmins/gymnosophists’ Ranga Botto, Vinaique Pandito & Apu Botto {Bhatt}

There goes caste/knowledge equation for a toss 🤣😂 ImageImageImageImage
Now let us look at the actual text

The first entry is Thengu/Coconut, a fitting topic given the Kerala origin of the ‘doctors’😂

Am sure Mal., Tam & coastal Kar. folks can translate the ‘scientific’ terminology used in Hortus

Thenga । Caricu । Bellaca । Cotta Tenga । Elani(r) ImageImageImageImage
Let us look at a few other entries

Areca । Adakka । Cavunga । Carimpana

See terminology used. Check out the structured descriptions ImageImageImageImage
Kadali । Bala ।Vazha ।Papaya ।

Nendra
Kadali Vazha
Scheru Kadal
Puam (😂)

Southern folks still eat all these ‘balas’ calling them the same names !

Also Papaya 👇🏼 ImageImageImageImage
Looking at flowering plants

The familiar Champaca, with a Samskritam name also ImageImageImage
And Karnikaram!

Conna ।

The same beautiful flower (Cassia Fistula) which Monier Williams famously botched up! (next tweet)

Hortus gets it right - because the folks who ‘wrote’ it knew their stuff ImageImageImage
Here is the MW Karnikaram discussion
So to close out this discussion

१ We were a knowledge super-power. No shame in that

२ We got colonized. No shame in acknowledging that also

३ Need to start re-building. The epistemological foundation exists even today

४ Can’t rely on ‘others’ to save us- Need to do our work!
Finally, instead of relying on hearsay & becoming victims of motivated gaslighting, we have resources to directly check out sources & evaluate information by ourselves

archive.org/details/Hortus…

For that, we need to invest in learning संस्कृतम्।

पठतु संस्कृतम्। जयतु भारतम्।

🙏🏼
Adding a few additional tweets on traditional knowledge systems, classification & sources of epistemic frameworks

Van Rheede talks about the highly evolved information matrix & the skills of the malabar medical practitioners (Vaidyas) Image
In addition, the tradition of “Ezhava Vaidyas” highlight how knowledge was developed & deployed among various practitioners & communities

Collatt Vaidyas are specifically highlighted & Itty Achuthan mentions how knowledge was categorized & transmitted through family sources ImageImage
The book was seen as a significant / revolutionary work

Carl Linnaeus specifically mentions it and uses it as a reference to establish 250 new species

Unlike many other sudden flowerings of European ‘sciences’, the Indian source & influence is readily acknowledged here Image
Padma Shri (2020) K S Manilal has translated the work to Malayalam & English

He specifically mentions how Itty Achuthan dictated the material in Malayalam sourced from ‘palm leaf’ manuscripts

This Malayalam material was translated to Latin ImageImage
We must internalize the following

१ Indian knowledge systems were very advanced

२ Colonization has had a severe adverse impact

३ Need to build a new knowledge model integrating current /cutting edge global scientific info within a revitalized भारतीय epistemic foundation

🙏🏼
Post script:

In order to signal the veracity of their statement, Vinayak Pandit, Apu & Ranga Bhatt writes their Konkani note specifically in Nagari!

स्वस्ति श्री शालिवाहन शाक १५९७…

The critical role of संस्कृतम् & देवनागरीलिपिः।

Konkani speakers can check the statements! ImageImageImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with प्वालः । pvaal

प्वालः । pvaal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pvaal2

16 Sep
Hunters । शापाः । Itihasa
 
A recent tweet mentioned how Western critics ignorantly claim ‘tragedy’ is absent in भारतीय इतिहासकाव्यानि

Let us see if the Western claim is true

Our Itihasas are replete with examples of tragedies-innocuous events spiraling wildly out of control Image
Take hunters & curses

Numerous episodes involve wayward hunters, hurled imprecations & unleashed chains of Karma that changed the course of events in uncontrollable ways

Also sparking off brilliant & beautiful Kavyas, Itihasas & Puranas
 
Let us explore 5 interesting episodes!
#1 आदिकाव्यम् & आदिकविः।
 
Starting from the very beginning, the AdiKavya, Ramayana
 
Maharshi Valmiki, while taking a dip in the Tamasa river sees a krauncha couple shot-down by a wayward hunter
 
At the close of this scene, he hurls the famous imprecation मा निषाद ! Image
Read 22 tweets
21 Jun
सूत्रसूत्रम्। Thread of Threads 😁

संस्कृतपठनार्थं कानिचन सूत्राणि अत्र स्थापयामि।

Creating a master thread to help सहृदयाः find relevant Samskrita threads

जयतु संस्कृतम्। जयतु भारतम्।

Starts with the most important thread:

HOW TO START LEARNING SAMSKRITAM ?
#१ How do I start learning Samskritam?
#२ How do I learn Samskritam in my mother tongue? Pradeshika Bhasha options!
Read 23 tweets
7 Jun
Most of the Indological dictionaries are copied heavily from ShabdaKalpadruma by राजा राधाकान्तदेवः।

Initial ‘Indologists’ deployed an army of “pundits” to do the ‘grunt work’ & taking credit without any referencing

Would be pretty much plagiarism under modern standards
The origin of Sanskrit dictionaries in the west is quite interesting

HH Wilson published the first one in 1838

Pretty much ‘copied’ the entire ShabdaKalpadrumah

Petersburger Worterbuch also relied heavily on शब्दकल्पद्रुमः & sources referenced in this magnum opus Image
HH Wilson has been explicitly acknowledged to fully ‘incorporate’ शब्दकल्पद्रुमः।

The initial review in the Asiatic Journal is useful

‘has, of course been carefully reproduced by the learned lexicographer, who was in possession of 3 volumes’

Mr Davis ‘uses’ it in his ‘essays’ ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
4 Jun
संस्कृत-नाटकानि। Samskrita Stage Production

Samskritam has one of the largest repositories of Drama & stage productions. Right from भरतमुनिः who wrote नाट्यशास्त्रम्, the treasures within संस्कृतम् is amazing

Here is a collation of traditional & modern नाटकानि in संस्कृतम्।
कर्णभारम्। Karnabharam

भासः । Bhasa

अभिज्ञान-शाकुन्तलम्। Abhijnana Sakuntalam

कालिदासः। Kalidasa

Read 16 tweets
7 Apr
On scrutiny, the Indological edifice turns out to be flimsy & fundamentally rotten

Analysis of even 1 word [godhuma] & 1 author [Witzel] confirms this dismal truth

-Scholarship riddled with errors
-Overt racism
-Claimed knowledge & mastery of संस्कृतम् missing

Disappointing!
Witzel’s scholarship shown to be problematic

1. For a Harvard “Sanskrit’ professor, no references to Sanskrit etymological sources. Why?

2. As we see, plain wrong info, fallacious arguments & specious reasoning abound

3. Irrelevant/wrong referencing. Potential ethical issues
Western “Sanskrit” scholarship relies on translated Indological works & NOT संस्कृतम् source documents

Errors in early Indological works transmitted unthinkingly & in unscholarly fashion by later Indologists

Bohtlingk’s godhuma/godhumi error flows to Witzel

No error correction
Read 6 tweets
24 Jan
Re: Witzel’s linguistics claim re: origin of “Godhuma” for Wheat & claims of it being a ‘nonsensical’ loan word

Claims etymology is “cow smoke” - seems extremely dubious, to say the least

2 references provided include Mayrhofer (EWA) & Kuiper

@vakibs Lets dive deeper..
Reference 1: Mayrhofer [EWA 498-499]

*godum analyzed as [go-dhuma - ‘cow smoke’]

Mayrhofer says-“Folk etymologies from gav-go-dhuma to be assumed”-what is the basis?? *crickets* 🦗 🦗

*Chinese origin theory by Mahdihassan rightly trashed as worthless. So should his own be.😁
Reference 2: FBJ Kuiper (IIJ34, 119)

Basis of Witzel’s claim - “even Avestan ...has such foreign words as ‘gantuma’ (wheat)”

Thats it.

The *entire* evidence

Just a random throw-away last sentence as the entire basis of the ‘cow-smoke’ claim!

‘Cow-smoke’ - my foot. 😁🤣😂
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(