"I once heard, and I think it is true, that only one man in the world—some Indian mathematician—understood the mathematics of string theory in eleven-dimensional space, and he dreamed it." - Kary Mullis
2/n We are told that Babylonians & Egyptians were the first to deal with "Elements of ancient Geometry."
Then I came across the interesting work of A Seidenberg, called "Ritual origin of Geometry." jstor.org/stable/41133224
He says: Egypt & Babylonia learnt it from Hindus.
3/n While Seidenberg gives very logical case that how it is armature attempt to think that Egyptians & Babylonians learnt elements of Geometry without Sulvasutras, we are also made aware about how the RigVaidik tribes had migrated out to latter influence to the rest of the world.
4/n Hence, undoubtedly, the Vaidik Hindu texts talking about Geometry had migrated out with the RigVaidik folks.
5/n This paper; <<Historical Contacts between Ancient India and Babylon by Gopal Stavig, Journal of Indian History (Platinum Jubilee Volume) (2001), pp. 1-16 >> gives very interesting connection between Bharat and Babylonia vedantawritings.com/IndBab.pdf
6/n The similar studies that how the migrations happened out of India & pass over of rituals too.
If there is an Indo-European Culture, it was the "Sanskrit Vaidik Culture,". It was culture, that was "Sanskriti", the one of Sanskrit.
7/n This gives you reason further that how Greeks to be none but those who had migrated out of India. The RigVaidik "Anu" tribe was the ancestor of Greeks.
8/n While many people link back Babylonia as the source of Greek Mathematics, Hindus appear to be source of both.
I came across another great paper: "Greek and Vedic Geometry" by Frits Staal as part of Journal of Indian Philosophy (1999) citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/downlo…
9/n According to Staal, indeed Vaidik Ritual Geometry became the ignitron for the geometry in Mediterranean & elsewhere.
10/n I came across an interesting book "Alchemy: An Introduction to the Symbolism and the Psychology" published in 1980.
According to the research of author Greeks knew India as the land of wealth & wisdom.
11/n Swami Vivekanand talks about Greeks having an influence of Brahmins of Bharat. He quotes Apuleius to have said that Pythagoras came to India to learn from Brahmins.
12/n Further I again refer to Swami Ji. He makes a case clear that Pythagoras learnt philosophy from Sankhya Darshan experts. That was the begin of the philosophy for Greece and West and hence of Mathematics too.
Source: Complete Works, Volume II: “Sankhya and Vedanta”
13/n There is a very interesting book by Swami Tathagatananda called, "Journey of the Upanishads to the West". Refer page 384-88
The case is clearly made that how Pythagoras studied Upanishads & Brahmanas.
14/n I also came across this book "Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans" authored by Charles H. Kahn. The author uses primary sources to show that about the travels of Pythagoras.
17/n Then again if I refer to "Journey of the Upanishads to the West"by Swami Tathagatananda again clear case is presented that so called "Pythagoras Theorem" already existed in Sulvasutras, Baudhayayana Srautasutra & Satapata Brahmana.
Undoubtedly Pythagoras learnt from India
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Read what Clement of Alexandria writes around 200 AD.
He says, “There are those who have determined not only the year of our Lord's birth, but also the day; ...
... & they say that it took place in the 28th year of Augustus, & in the 25th day of (the Egyptian month) Pachon (May 20)... Further, others say that He was born on the 24th or 25th of Pharmuthi (April 20 or 21).”
Dear @Mufti_Yasir īśvára is very much context based.
That is the reason why many see Shiva as īśvára while many see Vishnu as. You perhaps won't even get what the amalgamation of Nirgun & Sagun literally means.
Who is he PM of? He is PM of country that is defined by article-1, "India, that is Bharat".
& what is Bharat? it is the Civilizational State of which Kashi is pivot.
If you question PM @narendramodi taking part in it grandly, you certainly are also mocking the constitution makers who refrained from inserting "Secular"as they thought Bharat's culture has it by default.
1/n I had a fact check for @sumanthraman , couldn't respond for lack of time. Some clarity in this thread or his allegations that Marathas destroyed Shringeri.
He may respond should he have enough substance. @ShivaniGupta_5 tagging you as you were the anchor.
2/n This all story majorly got popularized after the mockery of History that BN Pande did. I'm sure @sumanthraman is aware whom I'm talking about. If not, I'll supply details for that too (check his paper AUrangzeb and Tipu Sultan)
Anyways let's bust your myth.
Read on.
3/n They were the Pindaris, mercenaries who had devastated Shringeri. They were freebooters.
In fact as per the primary sources Peshwa Madhawaro was badly anguished.
People want to compare Lakshmi Narsimha Swamy Temple, Yadadri with Kashi Vishwanath Corridor.
It is a futile & baseless effort.
The old pictures of both & history for past 5 centuries would tell people why I’m saying so.
It is also important to understand Mandir Architecture of different parts of north too has many variants, & to compare it with the style we know & are aware of is injustice to grandness of subject.
Hindus didn’t built only for grandeur but it was more about science, humility of spaces.
That’s the reason why although to many the Roman & Greek Architecture would look better but still smallest of Shikhar in Hampi has lot to offer as architecture brilliance.