2: Her paper closely examines Chinese investment and loan activities in Argentina’s solar and wind power sectors. An adaptive partnership has evolved among key actors and institutions, strengthening alignment between Argentina's own development objectives and Chinese investments.
3: She also explores how Argentinian players can better assess and classify whether putative Chinese projects actually support Argentina’s economic growth and sustainable development needs, especially through technology transfers and/or joint development of energy technologies.
4: #ChinaLocalGlobal is a seven-region initiative at @CarnegieEndow supported by @FordFoundation. It explores how China extends its global influence not just by exporting a putative "China model" but by adapting to local forms, norms, and practices, while leveraging local actors.
5: Be sure to check out some of the earlier papers in the project. For instance, @RYellinek explored how Chinese players, to bolster their influence in Israel, have leveraged local Hebrew language media to calibrate their messages for Israeli audiences. carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/27/how…
6: In a pathbreaking and notably counter-consensus paper, @dvanderkley and @nivayautszyan show how China's economic profile in Central Asia increasingly means investments in value-added industry, local hires, and upskilling. Locals are driving this shift. carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/15/how…
7: In Ecuador, @cquiliconi and Pablo Rodriguez Vasco explore how Chinese miners' efforts to leverage local players undercut and divided Indigenous opposition in unsustainable ways. Ultimately, this backfired on them. carnegieendowment.org/2021/09/20/chi…
8: In the Philippines, @alvincamba showed how Chinese players accommodated Philippine ruling elites concerned with political expediency in sidestepping social and environmental safeguards on infrastructure projects. carnegieendowment.org/2021/06/15/how…
9: In Pakistan, @KatAdeney and @FilippoBoni1 explored bilateral negotiating records to show how Pakistani actors have wielded agency in important ways, while Chinese actors at times have accommodated key Pakistani demands. carnegieendowment.org/2021/05/24/how…
10: In Brazil, @AAbdenur, @mafolly, and @msantoro1978 show how Chinese-funded railway projects in the Amazon were profoundly shaped by dynamic institutional learning on both sides and sharp public debates in Brazil about environmental sustainability. carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/04/wha…
11: In Pakistan again, Muhammad Tayyab Safdar shows how Chinese inroads have been built on the diversification of ties to *local* stakeholders, notably in the education, media, and energy sectors. carnegieendowment.org/2021/06/02/loc…
12: And in Chile, @FranciscoUrdin explored how medical and equipment supplies during the pandemic have come from a diverse cast of Chinese players with local experience in Chile. They adapted to Chile’s unique system of emergency and disaster management. carnegieendowment.org/2021/04/06/chi…
13: We're working across seven regions: Africa, Central Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and North Africa, the Pacific, South Asia, and Southeast Asia—exploring adaptive Chinese strategies that work within local realities. Papers and multimedia here: carnegieendowment.org/specialproject…
14: Stay tuned for exciting new papers in the new year on adaptive local and Chinese strategies and interactions in all seven regions, including case studies of Myanmar, Benin, Brazil, Algeria, Vanuatu and Saudi Arabia. We'll also have multimedia products and strategic convening.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1: I’m absolutely thrilled to launch my new volume with colleague @MikeNelson—“The Korean Way With Data: How the World’s Most Wired Country is Forging a Third Way.” It’s part of our big buildout underway at @CarnegieEndow on technology futures in Asia: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/kor…
2: I’m deeply grateful to @KoreaFoundation for its support of the project, and to our fabulous Korean colleagues: Jang GyeHyun, Lim Jong-in, So Jeong Kim, Nohyoung Park, Sunha Bae, and Kyung Sin “KS” Park. @KoreaFoundUSA.
3. Many argue that the world is fracturing into two spheres—either a Sinocentric or US-centric order. As we move into the next phase of the digital transformation, what was once viewed as a commercial and technological competition is now framed as an existential geopolitical one.
1: China-funded railway projects in the Brazilian Amazon met a thicket of local resistance. In the Ferrogrão, Chinese and Brazilian players adapted. This terrific new paper in our @CarnegieEndow#ChinaLocalGlobal project explores these adaptive dynamics: carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/04/wha…
2: The authors, @AAbdenur, @mafolly and @msantoro1978, show learning on both sides in the mitigation and management of socio-environmental risks around Chinese investments in Brazil's transportation infrastructure. They explore ongoing negotiations, plans, and controversies.
3: This paper is the latest in our seven-region #ChinaLocalGlobal initiative, which explores how China extends its influence by working through local actors and institutions while adapting and assimilating local and traditional forms, norms, and practices.
1: Thread: Many argue that China exports its developmental model and imposes it on other countries. But Chinese players also extend their influence by working through local actors and institutions while adapting and assimilating local and traditional forms, norms, and practices.
2: With the generous support of @FordFoundation@CarnegieEndow is developing an innovative body of research on Chinese engagement in seven regions of the world—Africa, Central Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and North Africa, the Pacific, South Asia, and Southeast Asia.
3: The initiative, #ChinaLocalGlobal, involves a mix of textured country-specific and multi-country regional research, cross-regional comparative work, and (as COVID fades) some strategic convening. carnegieendowment.org/specialproject…
1/6: THREAD ... Some of my recent work on the future of Taiwan's economic competitiveness ... Five easy pieces:
2/6: Taiwan’s innovation advantage is in danger of eroding. My dive into why it needs a revitalized and broadened strategy, more diverse investments in human capital and next-generation industries, and forward-looking partnerships, not least with the U.S.: carnegieendowment.org/2020/01/29/ass…
3/6: Taiwan needs to look not just to the energy it needs right now but also to the energy it will need 10-20 years from now if it is to power its future. My study of two paradigmatic transformation that are especially relevant to Taiwan’s energy future: carnegieendowment.org/2020/04/27/ove…
1: Long thread follows … A lot of the commentary on RCEP today, some of which disses it as a minimalist trade deal, misses the point. If you’re American, you can’t just look at it while ignoring the larger context of 25 years of change in Asia.
2. The problem, especially for the American strategic class (of which I am a card-carrying member), is threefold:
3: The first strategic problem is that American power in this region has been premised on both security and economic pillars ...
1/6: Thanks, and agree 100%, so it's not a rejoinder but a fact. Sadly, the US doesn't coordinate that especially well anymore. More important, I've argued over many years that the US seems oblivious to longer-term structural changes, in Asia especially, altering the landscape.
2/6: From 2011 (before the Belt and Road existed or Xi Jinping had yet taken power): Some of the writing of a more integrated Asia was already on the wall. I explored why the US had lost the plot in this essay, "Why America No Longer Gets Asia" in @TWQgw: csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/le…
@TWQgw 3/6: From 2009: Two decades of post-Asian Financial Crisis ideas threatened to marginalize the US (or alter its role without major adaptations from Washington). I explored with @Rmanning4 in this @CFR_org monograph on "The United States in the New Asia": cfr.org/asia-and-pacif…