Fatal sepsis🧵(1/14)

Sepsis is a leading cause of death in the first months of life and nearly half of under-5 deaths occur in the neonatal period.

There are no specific vaccines available to prevent neonatal sepsis, which is caused by a wide range of bacterial agents, but
we have shown across 3 BCG vs no-BCG RCTs conducted in 🇬🇼 that the beneficial non-specific effects (#NSEvac) of at-birth BCG vaccination more than halves the risk of fatal neonatal sepsis among hospitalized newborns: academic.oup.com/jid/article-ab…
Likely immunological mechanisms (2/14)
are BCG-induced 1) emergency granulopoiesis (science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…) & 2) trained immunity (nature.com/articles/s4157…)
In a meta-analysis of 4 🇬🇼 RCTs, providing BCG at birth reduced fatal neonatal non-TB infections by 40% (11% to 60%), see Table 4: academic.oup.com/jid/article-ab… (3/14)
An 🇺🇬 RCT recently corroborated BCG’s protective effects against non-TB infections: thelancet.com/journals/lanin…

An important paper for the prevention of early-life fatal sepsis was published on🎄 day; but first a little background on how novel scientific discoveries arise: (4/14)
For measles vaccination (MV), we discovered in 🇬🇼 that MV provided in the presence of maternal measles antibody enhanced MV's beneficial #NSEvac.

In a 🇩🇰 RCT, we found that previous maternal BCG similarly strengthened BCG's offspring #NSEvac: academic.oup.com/jpids/article/… (5/14)
We therefore initiated several projects testing this hypothesis:

1st, compared to no scar, we found that children with a BCG scar had 66% (33%-83%) lower mortality if their mother also had a BCG scar but only 8% (−83%-53%) for mothers w. no scar: academic.oup.com/jpids/article/… (6/14)
And in a retrospective study, maternal BCG vaccine scars were associated with a 60% (4% to 83%) reduction in all-cause mortality up to 6 weeks of age: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

We are now adding an important chapter to this developing story. (7/14)
As part of inclusion procedures in a previously published RCT testing different BCG strains provided at birth, academic.oup.com/cid/article/71…, our team assessed the maternal BCG scar status for 10,598 newborns; 60% of the mothers had a visible BCG scar from previous vaccination. (8/14)
As for providing neonatal BCG vs no BCG, being born to a mother with a BCG scar more than halved the risk of fatal sepsis by 6 weeks of age among admitted infants, the risk reduction being 51% (9% to 74%), when compared to if the mother had no scar. journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-… (9/14)
The protective effects against fatal sepsis were especially evident for males, for whom maternal scar was associated with a 65% (11% to 86%) reduction, when compared to no maternal scar.

Remember, all newborns had received BCG at birth as part of main trial procedures. (10/14)
The immunological pathways behind this intriguing finding is not yet known, but transmission of trained immunity and heterologous resistance to infections across generations was recently demonstrated by @katzmauski, @dominjor et al in @NatImmunol nature.com/articles/s4159… (11/14)
Unfortunately, BCG is not prioritized, as illustrated by the fact that 4289 mothers (40%) in our study had no 💉scar.

Despite the universal recommendation of BCG at birth, BCG is often delayed and @WHO-@UNICEF BCG coverage estimates are only compiled by 12 months of age. (12/14)
The background to this unfortunate situation is multifactorial and not least caused by logistic issues, but lets work together to remove known restrictive vial policies: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10… and other unnecessary barriers to BCG vaccination: bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…

(13/14)
I hope for help with retweets & contacts to policy-makers so we can together ensure that BCG is provided to more newborns as early as possible, especially in areas with high early-life mortality/morbidity and/or TB-endemic areas.

This would prevent many deaths globally. (14/14)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Frederik Schaltz-Buchholzer

Frederik Schaltz-Buchholzer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FSBuchholzer

20 Dec
When I tweeted this 6 weeks back (), it was with the expectation that the prevalence of C19 infections in vaccinated vs unvaccinated would gradually approach each other (reducing the unvac/vac ratio), due to expected declining protective immunity from 💉
and buildup of natural immunity. At the time, the ratio was ~2.9 w. ~500 vs 1200 cases. It has since gradually declined, but much faster in the last weeks.

Today, the ratio is only 1.30 with 1052 cases in unvac and 6910 for💉.

We need to have a discussion of this development,
because it should have substantial ramifications for public health policies:

1) The coronapassport, until mid-January valid for 12 m(!) after 2x💉has marginal to zero (or negative?) effects in this scenario

2) We should immediately assess whether the shots work against Omicron
Read 8 tweets
28 Nov
Min datter havde 5-års fødselsdag denne weekend og fik (udover en del andre 🎁) også muligheden for en snarlig COVID-19 💉. Jeg nød i den forbindelse at læse @Pottegard ’s balancerede refleksioner om +/- 💉.
Vi vælger at afvente pga. følgende:

🧵(1/13)
1)Studiet der ligger til grund for godkendelsen rapporterer markant beskyttelse imod 🦠, men follow-up er kun få mdr (som for voksne)
2)Ca. 1 ud af 1000 smittede i vores datters aldersgruppe får alvorlig C19 og til sammenligning er der, i de samlede studier blandt (...)
(2/13)
🧒<16 år, ret få der får alvorlige bivirkninger (severe AEs), men det kan alligevel ikke udelukkes at det er i omegnen af ca 0.2% eller 1 ud af 500 (NB: disse tal er behæftet med usikkerhed, så bemærk venligst forbehold)
3)Dette måske skyldes primært at studierne var små
(3/13)
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(