After 9/11/2001, Bush and Putin developed a close personal bond based on a shared definition of a common threat -- terrorism. US-Russia ties were close. The US withdrawal from the ABM treaty and NATO expansion faded as contentious issues. 1/
Bush's decision to invade Iraq fueled new tensions. Putin (like Germany, France & Obama) thought that intervention was a huge mistake. At their first meeting in 2009, Putin reminded Obama of that mistake. 2/
The real break in US-Russia relations in the Bush-era were color revolutions in Georgia in 2003 and Ukraine in 2004, which Putin claimed were masterminded by Washington. 3/
In the Obama-Medvedev era, a new era of cooperation occurred -- New START, NDN, sanctions in Iran, cooperation on Kyrgyzstan "color revolution", Russian membership into WTO, etc. 4/
It ended because Putin blamed the U.S. again for supporting color revolutions, first in the Arab world in 2011, then Russia 2011, then Ukraine 2013-2014. (Medvedev supported US use of force in Libya, btw) 5/
Not without reason, Putin fears popular movements in support of democracy. That's the central threat to his regime. NATO is an annoyance, but a much lesser threat to Putin's regime. 6/ END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In between Putin's spring military build-up on Ukraine's border and today's bigger build-up, what changed? 1/ THREAD
Did NATO become more aggressive in offering Ukraine membership? No. 2/
Did Biden become more vocal in supporting Ukraine's NATO membership? No. Just the opposite. Zelensky was disappointed in what he heard from Biden about NATO when they met last summer. 3/
"Biden should state publicly his desire to reinvigorate diplomacy to end the war in eastern Ukraine..." 1/ THREAD
including naming a senior envoy to represent the United States in these negotiations and insisting that the United States formally join Ukraine, Russia, Germany and France to reinvigorate the now moribund Normandy talks tasked with ending the war in eastern Ukraine. 2/
Such an announcement would dispel the absurd Russian claim that Washington and Kyiv are scheming to restore Ukrainian sovereignty over Donbas by military force ...3/
Now that Putin has published his ideas for a new European security agreement, let me propose some additional articles to the draft agreement. 1/
Article 1. Russia agrees to withdraw its forces from Moldova and restore full sovereignty to this European country. 2/
Article 2. Russia agrees to withdraw its forces from Georgia, renounce recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent countries, and restore the full sovereignty of Georgia. 3/
"Biden should state publicly his desire to reinvigorate diplomacy to end the war in eastern Ukraine, ..." 1/ THREAD
including naming a senior envoy to represent the United States in these negotiations and insisting that the United States formally join Ukraine, Russia, Germany and France to reinvigorate the now moribund Normandy talks tasked with ending the war in eastern Ukraine. 2/
Such an announcement would dispel the absurd Russian claim that Washington and Kyiv are scheming to restore Ukrainian sovereignty over Donbas by military force ...3/
In the margins of my undergrad thesis explaining Soviet intentions regarding interventions/non-interventions in Eastern Europe (56, 68, 81), my advisor, Alex Dallin, wrote in the margins 2 dozens times, "how do you know"? Wisdom from a great Soviet scholar is relevant today. 1/
BTW, I also wrote about US responses. Regarding Hungary 1956, we overpromised and undelivered. 2/
Regarding Czechoslovakia 1968, we did next to nothing; Johnson was focused on Asia (Vietnam) and polarized domestic politics. 3/
In 2010, "Russia" attended the NATO summit in Lisbon and called the friendly meeting "historic in terms of its spirit and atmosphere.." 1/ THREAD
At the NATO summit in 2010, "Russia" presented a grand proposal for missile defense cooperation, not exactly something you normally do with enemies. 2/
In 2011, "Russia" abstained on UN Security Resolutions 1970 & 1973, authorizing the use of force against Libya by NATO countries. Russia could have vetoed these resolutions and stopped NATO countries, but did not. It was a major cooperative moment between Russia-US-NATO. 3/